October 2002 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 1114] New: - Winrar2.90/3.00: Comboex doesn't trigger a event when you mouse-click in some value of it
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114 Summary: Winrar2.90/3.00: Comboex doesn't trigger a event when you mouse-click in some value of it Product: Wine Version: CVS Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-patches AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: clozano(a)andago.com It is easy of check, install winrar 2.90/3.00, click in the combo (you need a version of day 31/10/2002 or superior ;), and change the letter, and the listbox will not get updated. It works fine in comctl32 native. But the listbox will get updated if you press ENTER in the combobox value. I did some hacking in it: in comboex.c: * case CBN_SELCHANGE: if i add this 2 lines: (before of the SendMessageW) + cbeend.iWhy = CBENF_RETURN; + COMBOEX_NotifyEndEdit (infoPtr, &cbeend, NULL); return SendMessageW (parent, WM_COMMAND, wParam, (LPARAM)infoPtr->hwndSelf); Then it works Ok, but i am sure that it is a hack. Regards, Carlos. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1113] - kernel32.CopyFileW failure
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113 ------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2002-10-31 14:19 ------- Quite right. I see that now. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1113] - kernel32.CopyFileW failure
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113 ------- Additional Comments From joern(a)sierwald.com 2002-10-31 13:50 ------- Sorry, but this is not what I meant. The destination directory does exist already. The problem is that the destination ends with a '\' sign. Windows would append the actual filename to the destination and try to open that file. The resulting filename would be C:\\Program Files\\Borland\\InterBase\\ibinstall.dll". But WINE doesn't do that. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1113] - kernel32.CopyFileW failure
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113 ------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2002-10-31 13:39 ------- In this case it is a documented feature: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/bas… Go down near the bottom to the header "Directories", and it says "An application cannot create a directory with CreateFile; it must call CreateDirectory or CreateDirectoryEx to create a directory." And indeed, running on WinNT, if there is no such directory, this call sets the LastError to ERROR_INVALID_NAME. I have seen another program that expects that and then makes a call to create the directory. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1113] New: - kernel32.CopyFileW failure
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113 Summary: kernel32.CopyFileW failure Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: wine-binary AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: joern(a)sierwald.com Hi everybody. I was using build 20021007, that was not available to select for "version", on Redhat 7.3. I tried to install the Interbase (an SQL database from Borland) client and the installer reported that it could not copy any of the files from the install subdirectory to the destination. Installation failed. I managed to produce this debug output from wine: 08073ed8:Call kernel32.CopyFileW(402af0f8 L"C:\\ib_install\\client\\ibinstall.dll",402af150 L"C:\\Program Files\\Borland\\InterBase\\",00000000) ret=4131ee2f trace:file:CopyFileW L"C:\\ib_install\\client\\ibinstall.dll" -> L"C:\\Program Files\\Borland\\InterBase\\" trace:file:CreateFileW L"C:\\ib_install\\client\\ibinstall.dll" GENERIC_READ FILE_SHARE_READ FILE_SHARE_WRITE OPEN_EXISTING attributes 0x0 trace:file:CreateFileW returning 00000054 trace:file:GetFileInformationByHandle 00000054 trace:file:CreateFileW L"C:\\Program Files\\Borland\\InterBase\\" GENERIC_WRITE FILE_SHARE_READ FILE_SHARE_WRITE CREATE_ALWAYS attributes 0x20 warn:file:FILE_CreateFile Unable to create file '/usr/share/wine-c/Program Files/Borland/InterBase' (GLE 82) trace:file:CreateFileW returning ffffffff warn:file:CopyFileW Unable to open dest L"C:\\Program Files\\Borland\\InterBase\\" 08073ed8:Ret kernel32.CopyFileW() retval=00000000 ret=4131ee2f What I can see here is that the destination is not a file name (as it is supposed to be) but the name of a subdirectory. WINE does not like that. The installer works flawlessly on any known windows platform, this looks like an undocumented feature of windows to me. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1111] - Installer loops when asking for second CD
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111 ------- Additional Comments From unicorn(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-10-31 12:18 ------- I didn't look in the FAQ. However, as you can see, my original description of the problem describes that I tried a very similar solution already (with symlinks to all files on the two CDs instead of copying the files). Now I have tried copying the files to a single directory as well, and I still get the same problem with the installer looping over the question to insert CD two. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1111] - Installer loops when asking for second CD
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |normal ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-10-31 10:33 ------- A severity of blocker would be if wine would not compile or run Did you look at this in the FAQ database http://www.winehq.org/cgi-bin/fom?_highlightWords=cdrom&file=223 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1073] - Wine does not show Drives/Directories in StarCraft Installer
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073 ------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2002-10-31 08:41 ------- tested patch, it didnt resolve the problem, but it was a step closer. he submitted another patch but i havent had a chance to test it out yet.. i will do that tonight and post the results. both patches have been committed to CVS already... DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1111] - Installer loops when asking for second CD
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 31 Oct '02

31 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111 ------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-10-31 04:40 ------- I don't think severity means the impact on the application in question as much as the impact on the component. Can anyone confirm those thoughts? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 48] - PrgWin95/98: System metrics differ from the Win9x values
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48 ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-10-30 20:34 ------- Wine Win98 SM_CYVTHUMB 15 16 See Note 1 SM_CXHTHUMB 15 16 See Note 1 SM_CXSMSIZE 15 13 Hard Coded at 15 also used for SM_CYSMSIZE SM_CYMAXIMIZED sh-5 sh+8 SM_CYSCREEN - 45 see Note 2 SM_CXMENUCHECK 14 13 Hard Coded at 14 SM_CYMENUCHECK 14 13 Hard Coded at 14 Note 1. when winelook is greater than win31 These values are gotten indirectly from the registry and 1 is added to the value when it shouldn't AFAICT Note 2. sysMetrics[SM_CYSCREEN] = GetDeviceCaps( hdc, VERTRES ) Do we care very much about sysmetrics for winelook win31 if not the following patch should close this bug. If you want I could doa patch using checks for winelook > win31 Index: sysmetrics.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/windows/sysmetrics.c,v retrieving revision 1.30 diff -u -r1.30 sysmetrics.c --- sysmetrics.c 28 Aug 2002 00:54:53 -0000 1.30 +++ sysmetrics.c 31 Oct 2002 02:29:30 -0000 @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ sysMetrics[SM_WINE_BPP] = GetDeviceCaps( hdc, BITSPIXEL ); sysMetrics[SM_CXBORDER] = 1; sysMetrics[SM_CYBORDER] = sysMetrics[SM_CXBORDER]; - sysMetrics[SM_CYVTHUMB] = sysMetrics[SM_CXVSCROLL] - 1; + sysMetrics[SM_CYVTHUMB] = sysMetrics[SM_CXVSCROLL]; sysMetrics[SM_CXHTHUMB] = sysMetrics[SM_CYVTHUMB]; sysMetrics[SM_CXICON] = 32; sysMetrics[SM_CYICON] = 32; @@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ sysMetrics[SM_CXSMICON] = sysMetrics[SM_CYSIZE] - (sysMetrics[SM_CYSIZE] % 2); sysMetrics[SM_CYSMICON] = sysMetrics[SM_CXSMICON]; sysMetrics[SM_CYSMCAPTION] = 16; - sysMetrics[SM_CXSMSIZE] = 15; - sysMetrics[SM_CYSMSIZE] = sysMetrics[SM_CXSMSIZE]; + sysMetrics[SM_CXSMSIZE] = 13; + sysMetrics[SM_CYSMSIZE] = 15; sysMetrics[SM_CXMENUSIZE] = sysMetrics[SM_CYMENU] - 1; sysMetrics[SM_CYMENUSIZE] = sysMetrics[SM_CXMENUSIZE]; @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ sysMetrics[SM_CXMAXIMIZED] = sysMetrics[SM_CXSCREEN] + 2 * sysMetrics[SM_CXFRAME]; sysMetrics[SM_CYMAXIMIZED] = - sysMetrics[SM_CYSCREEN] - 45; + sysMetrics[SM_CYSCREEN] - 32; sysMetrics[SM_NETWORK] = 3; /* For the following: 0 = ok, 1 = failsafe, 2 = failsafe + network */ @@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ sysMetrics[SM_CXDRAG] = 2; sysMetrics[SM_CYDRAG] = 2; - sysMetrics[SM_CXMENUCHECK] = 14; - sysMetrics[SM_CYMENUCHECK] = 14; + sysMetrics[SM_CXMENUCHECK] = 13; + sysMetrics[SM_CYMENUCHECK] = 13; /* FIXME: Should check the type of processor for the following */ sysMetrics[SM_SLOWMACHINE] = 0; DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0