April 2002 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 565] New - wine cant catch/execute pointer from other process(example Halflife/Anticheat or battlecom)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565 *** shadow/565 Sat Apr 6 16:44:21 2002 --- shadow/565.tmp.2974 Sat Apr 6 16:44:21 2002 *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,27 ---- + +============================================================================+ + | wine cant catch/execute pointer from other process(example Halflife/Antich | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Bug #: 565 Product: Wine | + | Status: UNCONFIRMED Version: unspecified | + | Resolution: Platform: | + | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | + | Priority: P1 Component: test | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Assigned To: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com | + | Reported By: ah_duke(a)yahoo.com | + | CC list: Cc: | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Milestone: TargetMilestone: --- | + | URL: | + +============================================================================+ + | DESCRIPTION | + I tried to get battlecom installed. + I recievid the same errors like Halflife produces with anti-cheat program cheating death. + It seems to be an generaly problem! + + err:win:WIN_FindWndPtr window 10021 belongs to other process + err:win:WIN_FindWndPtr window 10021 belongs to other process + fixme:win32:SetCriticalSectionSpinCount critsection=0x653cf7a0: spincount=1000 not supported + fixme:win32:SetCriticalSectionSpinCount critsection=0x653cf810: spincount=1000 not supported + + the main process waits for the new process. the system hangs. \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[Bug 558] Changed - wine gives all windows apps the finger
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558 *** shadow/558 Sat Apr 6 14:33:57 2002 --- shadow/558.tmp.21294 Sat Apr 6 14:57:18 2002 *************** *** 63,65 **** --- 63,76 ---- that is the exact problem for the spaces. thanks. im not exactly a command line god but i can fiddle around with it - that is how i got word to 'work' for that half second. + + ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-04-06 14:57 ------- + If I recall correctly CodeWeavers (and a lot of other rpm's) dont set up the + debugger. In order to get a proper trace on this problem you need to set up the + debugger.The thing is CodeWeavers rpm is about 6 months old and many changes + have been made to wine in the mean time. If you can do without the point and + click (which dosen't "really" work) why not uninstall the rpm, ("rpm -e wine" + should do the trick) and install from the latest tarball. This is covered here + if you are interested. http://www.winehq.com/Docs/wine-user/ If you have any + problems/questions I'll try to help. +

1 0

[Bug 327] Changed - CodeWeavers Preview Meta Bug
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327 *** shadow/327 Tue Apr 2 09:06:36 2002 --- shadow/327.tmp.19188 Sat Apr 6 14:34:21 2002 *************** *** 7,13 **** | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | | Priority: P1 Component: wine-misc | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: bugs(a)codeweavers.com | | Reported By: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com | | CC list: Cc: | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ --- 7,13 ---- | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | | Priority: P1 Component: wine-misc | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com | | Reported By: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com | | CC list: Cc: | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1 0

[Bug 558] Changed - wine gives all windows apps the finger
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558 *** shadow/558 Wed Apr 3 20:40:03 2002 --- shadow/558.tmp.19116 Sat Apr 6 14:33:57 2002 *************** *** 7,13 **** | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | | Priority: P1 Component: wine-binary | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: bugs(a)codeweavers.com | | Reported By: therogue86(a)aol.com | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Milestone: TargetMilestone: --- | --- 7,13 ---- | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | | Priority: P1 Component: wine-binary | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com | | Reported By: therogue86(a)aol.com | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Milestone: TargetMilestone: --- | *************** *** 57,59 **** --- 57,65 ---- Now what about Word 2K you say It comes up for half a second and then dies. How good do you think you are at the console (xterm)? + + + ------- Additional Comments From therogue86(a)aol.com 2002-04-06 14:33 ------- + that is the exact problem for the spaces. thanks. + im not exactly a command line god but i can fiddle around with it - that is how + i got word to 'work' for that half second. \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[Bug 557] Changed - starcraft no response
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557 *** shadow/557 Sat Apr 6 11:39:57 2002 --- shadow/557.tmp.17858 Sat Apr 6 14:02:57 2002 *************** *** 91,93 **** --- 91,99 ---- + + + ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-04-06 14:02 ------- + It seems that whatever is happening is locking up x pretty tight. It's really + not good when you can't ctrl-alt-F1. Lets start with something simple then. what + happens when you run sol.exe? \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[Bug 259] New - Garbled screen in Starcraft
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=259 *** shadow/259 Sat Apr 6 11:46:37 2002 --- shadow/259.tmp.11054 Sat Apr 6 11:46:37 2002 *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,25 ---- + +============================================================================+ + | Garbled screen in Starcraft | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Bug #: 259 Product: Wine | + | Status: UNCONFIRMED Version: unspecified | + | Resolution: Platform: | + | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | + | Priority: P1 Component: wine-multimedia | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Assigned To: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com | + | Reported By: sqrammi(a)hotmail.com | + | CC list: Cc: | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Milestone: TargetMilestone: --- | + | URL: | + +============================================================================+ + | DESCRIPTION | + I have an ATI Radeon card that used to have little problems before I installed the new X + Windows 4.1.0, but it didn't fix my old problem in Wine. + I can get into Starcraft just fine and all but it brings up a totally garbled screen. + I can see my cursor moving around but it's all on different lines and looks like it's + trying to write to a screen of the wrong dimensions. + + ------- Additional Comments From asus_000(a)hotmail.com 2002-04-06 11:46 ------- + I am having same problems ... my bug is in 557 try the hints listed there \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[Bug 557] Changed - starcraft no response
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557 *** shadow/557 Thu Apr 4 22:04:35 2002 --- shadow/557.tmp.10742 Sat Apr 6 11:39:57 2002 *************** *** 83,85 **** --- 83,93 ---- ------- Additional Comments From asus_000(a)hotmail.com 2002-04-04 22:04 ------- i tryed the trace thingy and it still didn't work.. i found the dirvers on that site but it said that linux already had then on the install cd's and kernel + + + ------- Additional Comments From asus_000(a)hotmail.com 2002-04-06 11:39 ------- + also i can't ctrl+alt+f1 out after i start wine + i can't monitor the harddrive while in wine and i can't do anything + + +

1 0

[Bug 434] Changed - Mouse button don't get released (Macromedia Flash 5.0)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434 *** shadow/434 Fri Apr 5 08:45:15 2002 --- shadow/434.tmp.5789 Fri Apr 5 18:05:00 2002 *************** *** 135,137 **** --- 135,296 ---- going to stdout) Is there a click/release timer that could be increased? + + + ------- Additional Comments From ivanovich(a)menta.net 2002-04-05 18:05 ------- + I tried to find myself what was happening with this bug and did some debugging, + i don't have the knowledge to understand what happens but maybe someone can find + this useful: + + 1- Some observations + 2- Output from strace when hitting the bug + 3- Output from gdb when backtracing the wine process which seems to loop + + + 1. all tests performed on Macromedia Flash 5 + - Bug happens after clicking the left mouse button over the draw zone + - The bug seems an endless loop of some kind (probably waiting for a mouse + button release event which isn't sent or something like this), 100% cpu gets + used by process wine, wineserver, and X. They use about 33% load each (X uses a + bit more) + - Strace shows an error from the read system call which maybe is related with + the bug + - While waiting for mouse button release event, the application constantly + draws a rectangle from the point where the mouse button was clicked down to the + point where the cursor is actually located (this is normal behaviour in winblows + while you drag the mouse). + Maybe the function or proccess drawing of that rectangle is using the + resource which strace error log is talking about (resource temporarily + unavailable). + + 2- strace output + + When it enters the bug the strace output looks like this + I have no idea about it but can the "Reource temporarily unavailable" error + can be caused by someone trying to read mouse status and being unable to do so? + command run to get the output: strace wine flash.exe + + read(10, 0x405b6788, 32) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily + unavailable) + select(11, [10], NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [10]) + read(10, "\1\1d\36\0\0\0\0p\0\0\0\300\376\340\0u\2v\2u\2v\2\4\0\35"..., 32) = 32 + gettimeofday({1018043017, 590545}, NULL) = 0 + rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT ALRM IO], [32], 8) = 0 + write(4, "s\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 + read(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 + rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [32], NULL, 8) = 0 + write(10, "&\1\2\0p\0\0\0", 8) = 8 + read(10, 0x405b6788, 32) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily + unavailable) + select(11, [10], NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [10]) + read(10, "\1\1e\36\0\0\0\0p\0\0\0\300\376\340\0u\2v\2u\2v\2\4\0\377"..., 32) = + 32 + gettimeofday({1018043017, 607734}, NULL) = 0 + gettimeofday({1018043017, 607765}, NULL) = 0 + rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT ALRM IO], [32], 8) = 0 + write(4, "s\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 + read(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 + rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [32], NULL, 8) = 0 + write(10, "&\1\2\0p\0\0\0", 8) = 8 + read(10, 0x405b6788, 32) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily + unavailable) + select(11, [10], NULL, NULL, NULL) = 1 (in [10]) + read(10, "\1\1f\36\0\0\0\0p\0\0\0\300\376\340\0u\2v\2u\2v\2\4\0\35"..., 32) = 32 + gettimeofday({1018043017, 609112}, NULL) = 0 + rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT ALRM IO], [32], 8) = 0 + write(4, "s\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 + read(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 + rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [32], NULL, 8) = 0 + write(10, "&\1\2\0p\0\0\0", 8) = 8 + + 3- gdb output + + I run gdb wine in the wine source directory. + I followed the procedure explained in the wine debugging FAQ, section for + endless loops (http://wine.codeweavers.com/fom-meta/cache/251.html) + Then i attach the process wine which is using the cpu (there are another + processes called wine but they're not using cpu) + Then i run "bt" inside gdb, the output of backtrace is this: + #0 0x402fc51e in __select () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 + #1 0x40e3e1b4 in _XlcPublicMethods () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + #2 0x40d7e6da in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + #3 0x40d7f19a in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + #4 0x40d75b0e in XQueryPointer () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + #5 0x40cb7b69 in TSXQueryPointer () from /usr/local/lib/libwine_tsx11.so + #6 0x000033ec in ?? () + Cannot access memory at address 0xfffffd84 + + Then i run "n" as suggested by the wine debugging FAQ, the outputs of some + consecutive "n"s are this: + + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function __select, + which has no line number information. + 0x40d7d973 in _XPollfdCacheDel () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function _XPollfdCacheDel, + which has no line number information. + 0x40d7e6da in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function _XRead, + which has no line number information. + 0x40d7f19a in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function _XReply, + which has no line number information. + 0x40d75b0e in XQueryPointer () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function XQueryPointer, + which has no line number information. + 0x40cb7b69 in TSXQueryPointer () from /usr/local/lib/libwine_tsx11.so + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function TSXQueryPointer, + which has no line number information. + 0x40c6ca5f in X11DRV_GetCursorPos () from /usr/local/lib/wine/x11drv.dll.so + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function X11DRV_GetCursorPos, + which has no line number information. + 0x406cbb19 in GetCursorPos () from /usr/local/lib/wine/user32.dll.so + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function GetCursorPos, + which has no line number information. + + here the cpu gets 100% used and the function dont returns + + Sometimes i get another backtrace when i detach and try again: + + (gdb) bt + #0 0x402f5964 in __libc_read () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 + #1 0x400fbc1c in __DTOR_END__ () from /usr/local/lib/libntdll.dll.so + #2 0x008d59db in ?? () + #3 0x0075b17a in ?? () + #4 0x0075abb8 in ?? () + #5 0x0075987b in ?? () + #6 0x00759b86 in ?? () + #7 0x406ea87f in WINPROC_wrapper () from /usr/local/lib/wine/user32.dll.so + #8 0x406ea921 in WINPROC_CallWndProc () from /usr/local/lib/wine/user32.dll.so + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function __libc_read, + which has no line number information. + 0x400c97b4 in read_reply_data () from /usr/local/lib/libntdll.dll.so + Current language: auto; currently asm + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function read_reply_data, + which has no line number information. + 0x400c9833 in wine_server_call () from /usr/local/lib/libntdll.dll.so + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function wine_server_call, + which has no line number information. + 0x406da076 in GetInputState () from /usr/local/lib/wine/user32.dll.so + (gdb) n + Single stepping until exit from function GetInputState, + which has no line number information. + + + One more thing: + Rick, i tried running wine --debugmsg +scroll,+event,+toolbar,+gdi,+heap + flash.exe as you pointed, but it didn't worked for my case, the bug still shows. + + And, can you please try to run your app with strace wine yourapp.exe and trigger + the bug? If you do, you get a read error like mine? Don't know if it's important + but it seems to me it's related. \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[Bug 563] New - Top Win Bar doesn't produce non-standard menus.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563 *** shadow/563 Fri Apr 5 13:51:51 2002 --- shadow/563.tmp.22778 Fri Apr 5 13:51:51 2002 *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,26 ---- + +============================================================================+ + | Top Win Bar doesn't produce non-standard menus. | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Bug #: 563 Product: Wine | + | Status: UNCONFIRMED Version: unspecified | + | Resolution: Platform: | + | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | + | Priority: P1 Component: wine-programs | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Assigned To: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com | + | Reported By: dsmith(a)financialengines.com | + | CC list: Cc: | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Milestone: TargetMilestone: --- | + | URL: | + +============================================================================+ + | DESCRIPTION | + When running Radmin, (like pcanywhere, www.radmin.com) right clicking on the top + menu bar doesn't work (to do things like "send-ctl-alt-del") and spits out this + error. wine version is 20020403 build + + fixme:listview:LISTVIEW_UnsupportedStyles LVS_SORTASCENDING + err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to + dispatch exception. + err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to + dispatch exception. \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[Bug 475] Changed - SetActiveWindow does not support foreign processes
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

http://bugs.codeweavers.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475 *** shadow/475 Fri Apr 5 11:37:04 2002 --- shadow/475.tmp.18830 Fri Apr 5 12:56:30 2002 *************** *** 38,40 **** --- 38,45 ---- I basically added the bug to remind the team that we probably want to have some functionality in this area; certainly without it our software will be awkward to use since the default change of active window is not what we desire. + + ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-04-05 12:56 ------- + This bug is a blocker of either the Tasklist(<a href="show_bug.cgi?id=395">bug + 395</a>)or the Fixme's (<a href="show_bug.cgi?id=455">bug 455</a>) I'm inclined + to think it belongs with the tasklist bug.

1 0