January 2003 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 650] - error messages when loading debugging information from libstdc++ on RedHat 7.3
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650 pouech(a)winehq.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |990 ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:43 ------- added dependency to 990 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 834] - Add DWARF2 support
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834 ------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2003-01-08 14:43 ------- Would this work for dumping a stack trace when winedbg is triggered on an unhandled SEH? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 845] - gcc Remote debugging
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845 fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2003-01-08 14:42 ------- I have not tested remote debugging myself but others on the list seem to be using it. So I guess this task can be considered done (new bug reports can be opened for future bugs if needed). DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 833] - Add support for inferior function calls
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833 pouech(a)winehq.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |pouech(a)winehq.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:40 ------- I already planned to implement it. Among the difficulties to deal with: - creation of the calling stack (we could use the program's own stack, but that could be risky) - there's no information in current stabs format whether a function is stdcall or cdecl, which could of course generate some bad bad bad results ;-) (we could try to infer it from some other bits... function prolog/epilog for example) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1063] - Debugger fails to access program memory
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063 pouech(a)winehq.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |pouech(a)winehq.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:38 ------- do you have the URL to test such a program ? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 845] - gcc Remote debugging
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845 ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:33 ------- I think we do have the correct code, don't we ? ready for closing the bug ? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 963] - Default values for wineconsole are not saved
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963 pouech(a)winehq.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pouech(a)winehq.com AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |pouech(a)winehq.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:31 ------- is the bug still occurs with current CVS code ? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 838] - winedbg: Add C++ support
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838 ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:30 ------- IMO, we shouldn't add C++ ABI support to winedbg I'd suggest to: 1/ fix winedbg to not spit out too many traces while loading C++ compiled modules (see 990) 2/ encourage gdb usage + proxy for C++ developement 3/ of course, integrate into gdb the PDB/MSC parsing/loading we have in winedbg DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 834] - Add DWARF2 support
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834 ------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:28 ------- as I already wrote, IMO Dwarf support should be provided thru gdb only we will better off with gdb than writting our own debugger DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

Possible bug (with fix) in MENU_FindItem()
by Peter Gerwinski 08 Jan '03

08 Jan '03

Hello, while developing an application for WINE (also intended to run under MSPOW = MicroSoft's Parody Of WINE, spoken "m-spow";-) I encountered something which I consider a bug in WINE: When I invoke EnableMenuItem to enable/disable a menu item holding a command with the numeric value 200, the first popup menu is enabled/disabled instead of the menu item. (This behaviour does not show up under MSPOW, version "ME".) IMHO this is due to a wrong order of two "if" conditions in control/menu.c:MENU_FindItem(). I am attaching a patch which fixed the problem for me. Greetings, Peter, wondering why item->wID has a value of 200 in the first place -- Software Patents = professional disbarment for programmers http://swpat.ffii.org

1 0