June 2003 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 1506] Problem with variant array allocation in Wine
by Wine Bugs 03 Jun '03

03 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-03-06 00:57 ------- is the reproducible with the download version? if yes, what actions lead to reproduction of the problem? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1506] New: Problem with variant array allocation in Wine
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506 Summary: Problem with variant array allocation in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: wine-binary AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: cozzuol(a)enter-net.com.br Hi all, I was trying to use a statistical program called PAST under Wine. It use to run OK, but recently (with new Wine versions - wine-20030508, rpm version for Mandrake 9.1) I get some problems related to variant array allocation. Following is the feedback from the program owner, Oyvind Hammer (oyvind.hammer(a)nhm.uio.no). The Program site is http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past -------- quote ---------- To be precise, the problem is as follows. In Delphi, I do a:=VarArrayCreate([1,2,1,3], varDouble); This should allocate a variant array of size 2x3. And as expected, when I query the dimensions of the array in Windows, I get VarArrayHighBound(a, 1) = 2 and VarArrayHighBound(a, 2) = 3 However, under Wine I get the reverse, meaning that Wine has allocated a 3x2 array: VarArrayHighBound(a, 1) = 3 and VarArrayHighBound(a, 2) = 2 This causes "Variant index out of bounds" when I refer to the cell a[1,3] for example. --------- end quote ---------- -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1480] Installers need cabinet.dll FDI* functions, and DCOM installer is broken (version too high)
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480 ------- Additional Comments From wine(a)unixslave.com 2003-02-06 18:04 ------- I get this error in installshield as well: [hennessy(a)marvin foo]$ wine semc_j2me_sdk_v11_55.exe fixme:cdrom:CDROM_GetIdeInterface cdrom not a block device!!! fixme:cdrom:CDROM_GetIdeInterface cdrom not a block device!!! fixme:cdrom:CDROM_GetIdeInterface cdrom not a block device!!! fixme:cdrom:CDROM_GetIdeInterface cdrom not a block device!!! fixme:cabinet:FDICreate (pfnalloc == ^0x402fc6, pfnfree == ^0x413d7e, pfnopen == ^0x4030ae, pfnread == ^0x402fd1, pfnwrite == ^0x40300e, pfnclose == ^0x403054, pfnseek == ^0x40307b, cpuType == 1, perf == ^0x406aebf4): stub err:dc:DCE_FreeWindowDCE [0x10023] GetDC() without ReleaseDC()! I have no Windows at all on my system, though in a pinch I could find an old ole32.dll on one of my installers :/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1505] RE:OLE32.dll does not work for visual foxpro application
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505 marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-02-06 12:44 ------- can you give us the +ole trace please? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1503] executing old 16-bit program leads to unhandled exception in scroll.c
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503 ------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2003-02-06 12:15 ------- Andreas, thanks for reply any ideas about some points of relay where all scenario should be changed? or should we wait for Alexandre to come back from vacation :-? in any case i am afraid it would be too hard for me to handle this situation alone. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1503] executing old 16-bit program leads to unhandled exception in scroll.c
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503 ------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2003-02-06 12:06 ------- hi Duane, that's a no problem :) i have read through bodies of some functions and saw some unexpected details. one for example could be that 32-to-16 bit message translations. at first i thought the cause of crash is translation, wrongly truncating "wParam". after i read some old win3.1 api help and thought both the pointers, and both integers they are pointing to should be 16-bit wide. it seems, wine passes 32-bit pointers to win16 subroutines. here arises question for me: why? shouldn't that address/pointers be translated alltogether somewhere between the: 16 0x407fbb59 (GetScrollRange+0x55(hwnd=0x10039, nBar=0x2, lpMin=0x415a2428, lpMax=0x415a242c) [scroll.c:1837] in user32.dll.so) (ebp=415a2410) 17 0x407dccf6 (GetScrollRange16+0x3a(hwnd=0x39, nBar=0x2, lpMin=0x40488362, lpMax=0x40488360) [wnd16.c:493] in user32.dll.so) (ebp=415a243c) or somewhere else? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1503] executing old 16-bit program leads to unhandled exception in scroll.c
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503 andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2003-02-06 11:56 ------- Hmm, if I have a closer look at WINPROC_MapMsg32ATo16(), I notice that SBM_GETRANGE doesn't receive any special handling. However I think it should be handled specially, since both LPARAM and WPARAM are supposed to be pointers to min and max values. In Win16 Watcom, it is defined as: void WINAPI GetScrollRange(HWND, int, int FAR*, int FAR*); In other words, *both* variables should be FAR pointers. Ah, WAIT!! Watcom has: ./h/nt/winuser.h:#define SBM_GETRANGE 0x00E3 /*not in win3.1 */ Guess why this is not available in Win3.1?? Because WPARAM is only 16bit-sized in Win16 (this was the big mystery that I've been trying to solve for 10 minutes now: how to fit a FAR pointer in a 16bit variable?? Answer: you don't ;) So it seems like Wine misbehaves here and does a Win16 call into our ScrollBarWndProc() for some reason. It should prevent this from happening much earlier, since using such Win16-crippled "pointers" CANNOT work, of course... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1503] executing old 16-bit program leads to unhandled exception in scroll.c
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503 ------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2003-02-06 11:27 ------- Oops, I read the second comment before the first. You already figured that out, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1503] executing old 16-bit program leads to unhandled exception in scroll.c
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503 ------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2003-02-06 11:25 ------- It looks to me like the interesting part is here. Notice how the pointer in wParam in line 12 (0x415a2428) was truncated to a the number 2428. And then that number caused the page fault. Unhandled exception: page fault on write access to 0x00002428 in 32-bit code (0x407faf61). In 32-bit mode. 0x407faf61 (SCROLL_GetScrollRange+0x25 [scroll.c:1321] in user32.dll.so): movl %edx,0x0(%esi) 1322 if (lpMax) *lpMax = infoPtr ? infoPtr->maxVal : 0; Wine-dbg>Backtrace: =>0 0x407faf61 (SCROLL_GetScrollRange+0x25(hwnd=0x10039, nBar=0x2, lpMin=0x2428, lpMax=0x415a242c) [scroll.c:1321] in user32.dll.so) (ebp=415a1e00) ... 11 0x4082a957 (WINPROC_CallWndProc16+0x163(proc=0x4a700dd, hwnd=0x39, msg=0xe3, wParam=0x2428, lParam=0x415a242c) [winproc.c:255] in user32.dll.so) (ebp=415a22c0) 12 0x4082f1fa (WINPROC_CallProc32ATo16+0x66(func=0x4a700dd, hwnd=0x10039, msg=0xe3, wParam=0x415a2428, lParam=0x415a242c) [winproc.c:2738] in user32.dll.so) (ebp=415a22fc) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1505] RE:OLE32.dll does not work for visual foxpro application
by Wine Bugs 02 Jun '03

02 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505 ------- Additional Comments From ungsm(a)onlineeos.com 2003-02-06 11:16 ------- Created an attachment (id=278) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=278&action=view) sample error screen Here is some sample screen -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0