September 2004 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 2107] fixme:thunk:CommonUnimpStub generic stub: ?
by Wine Bugs 29 Sep '04

29 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2107 ------- Additional Comments From bafraid2b1(a)hotmail.com 2004-29-09 19:38 ------- I've experienced this same problem using wine 20040914, although my install stalls at 76%. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 326] Implement an Esd sound module
by Wine Bugs 29 Sep '04

29 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326 ------- Additional Comments From jstrand1(a)rochester.rr.com 2004-29-09 13:02 ------- Why hasn't this patch been accepted? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2490] preloader.c does not compile with -fpie/-fstack-protector
by Wine Bugs 28 Sep '04

28 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2490 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)navi.cx 2004-28-09 10:18 ------- I expect that most parts of Wine do work with -fstack-protector, though I don't know the details of how that works enough to say (we run on an alternative stack). Perhaps we should go back to Alexandre and ask for -fno-stack-protector. I guess we could link without -nodefaultlibs but I'm not keen on that change, the preloader is quite fragile :( -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2490] preloader.c does not compile with -fpie/-fstack-protector
by Wine Bugs 28 Sep '04

28 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2490 ------- Additional Comments From basic(a)mozdev.org 2004-28-09 09:10 ------- well, I don't really care either way. But the stack-protector issue can be worked around by either: 1. removed to -nodefaultlibs flag 2. add --fno-stack-protector Of course the alternative is just to document that wine doesn't do -fstack-protector at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2490] preloader.c does not compile with -fpie/-fstack-protector
by Wine Bugs 27 Sep '04

27 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2490 mike(a)navi.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)navi.cx 2004-27-09 04:53 ------- I'll confirm this for now though I suspect this is still invalid. Until we figure out what you actually want to achieve with this, I'll keep it open. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2490] preloader.c does not compile with -fpie/-fstack-protector
by Wine Bugs 27 Sep '04

27 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2490 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)navi.cx 2004-27-09 04:46 ------- Well, the preloader is required to get a Win32 compatible address space. It's not a kernel 2.4/2.6 thing I'm afraid. The preloader is a rather unique piece of code, you can be assured these options are specified for a reason. Why do you want to disable it? Changing the options here provides no additional security whatsoever as the preloader cannot be exploited via buffer-overflows. You're far more likely to be compromised via the software you run on it. There was a discussion about this on wine-devel in the past few days. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2372] Unable to install Internet Explorer SP1.
by Wine Bugs 26 Sep '04

26 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2372 ------- Additional Comments From wine-bugzilla(a)fedorafaq.org 2004-26-09 13:26 ------- I've seen this, and it seemed to be fixed by using WINEDLLOVERRIDES="wininet=n,ole32=n,advpack=n" when doing the install. However, even then I run into an exception when trying to install, after the CABs are unpacked but before much real installation actually takes place (around 1%). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2333] when installint internet explorer 6 sp1 i get an error
by Wine Bugs 26 Sep '04

26 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2333 ------- Additional Comments From wine-bugzilla(a)fedorafaq.org 2004-26-09 13:21 ------- That's not a bug. Just run wineboot at the command-line. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2320] Diamond: err:opengl:X11DRV_ChoosePixelFormat Flag not supported
by Wine Bugs 26 Sep '04

26 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2320 burnus(a)gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lionel.ulmer(a)free.fr ------- Additional Comments From burnus(a)gmx.de 2004-26-09 11:29 ------- Lionel Ulmer: > Well, you are luckier than me.... I get either an X11 crash using my NVIDIA > drivers or an X11 error when using Mesa. > Anyway, the problem is that the application wants to do 'off-screen' rendering > (ie rendering to a DIB section instead of to a Window). This is not supported > (yet) in Wine. I think I found out why you get this crash and I not. I also get (now)a crash if I install Diamond and then open a file. If I choose File|New, Tools|Options and disable double buffering -- then I can open the files and get now either the message box stated above or, more usually, noting at all is drawn. > I will see what I can do, but I think it will problematic (as you will have > all the problems of synchronisations between the X11 Pixmap and the Win32 DIB > section). Is there any chance to fix the drawing when doing no double buffering? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2490] preloader.c does not compile with -fpie/-fstack-protector
by Wine Bugs 26 Sep '04

26 Sep '04

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2490 ------- Additional Comments From basic(a)mozdev.org 2004-26-09 08:41 ------- ok after playing around abit, it seems that the stack protector problem is with the -nodefaultlibs linker option. Not sure if removing that option would be ok. Adding -lc -lgcc didn't help. Though after digging through all this, I'm wondering if it is possible to have configure options to use or not to use the preloader? I mean, the preloader is only used to make wine portable across 2.4 and 2.6 linux kernels right? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0