March 2006 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 4663] ypops no longer runs under wine 0.9.8, it ran perfectly under wine 0.9.7 and earlyer
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 ------- Additional Comments From rob(a)codeweavers.com 2006-16-03 05:40 ------- I have no idea what you're trying to do with winedbg, but I'm pretty sure it's not going to reveal the error. Please attach a +explorer,+systray log. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4663] ypops no longer runs under wine 0.9.8, it ran perfectly under wine 0.9.7 and earlyer
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 ------- Additional Comments From multescugeorge(a)yahoo.com 2006-16-03 05:30 ------- tried to duplicate the debug session, but i can only reproduce up to the error: Wine-dbg>stepi err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code 80000003 flags 0 addr 0xffffe410 Process of pid=0x0000000a has terminated the process exits and i can't get any further info. Don't know why the first debug session was more "substantial", treat the info below the err with suspicion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4663] ypops no longer runs under wine 0.9.8, it ran perfectly under wine 0.9.7 and earlyer
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 ------- Additional Comments From multescugeorge(a)yahoo.com 2006-16-03 04:51 ------- I'm new at debugging things, but perhaps someone can use this info: winedbg /.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/YPOPs/ypops.exe WineDbg starting on pid 0x36 start_process () at /usr/src/wine/dlls/kernel/process.c:845 0x7fca111f start_process+0xb7 [/usr/src/wine/dlls/kernel/process.c:845] in kernel32: subl $12,%esp 845 ExitProcess( entry( peb ) ); Wine-dbg>stepi 7620 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x7fca1123 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x46df42 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x471006 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x470ecc fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x470be0 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x470be8 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x470bf0 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x470bf8 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x470972 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x46d65d fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x47099a fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x4709ab fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x46d7c9 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x4742f3 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x474401 fixme:winedbg:be_i386_is_func_call Unsupported yet call insn (0x10) at 0x47440f wine_server_handle_to_fd () at /usr/src/wine/dlls/ntdll/server.c:492 0x7ffb6747 wine_server_handle_to_fd+0xff [/usr/src/wine/dlls/ntdll/server.c:492] in ntdll: xorl %eax,%eax 492 SERVER_START_REQ( get_handle_fd ) Wine-dbg>stepi 100 0x4991c078 write+0x8 in libpthread.so.0: jnz 0x4991c09c write+0x2c in libpthread.so.0 Wine-dbg>stepi 0x4991c07a write+0xa in libpthread.so.0: pushl %ebx Wine-dbg>stepi 0x4991c07b write+0xb in libpthread.so.0: movl 0x10(%esp),%edx Wine-dbg>stepi 0x4991c07f write+0xf in libpthread.so.0: movl 0xc(%esp),%ecx Wine-dbg>stepi 0x4991c083 write+0x13 in libpthread.so.0: movl 0x8(%esp),%ebx Wine-dbg>stepi 0x4991c087 write+0x17 in libpthread.so.0: movl $0x4,%eax Wine-dbg>stepi 0x4991c08c write+0x1c in libpthread.so.0: call *%gs:0x00000010 Wine-dbg>stepi 0xffffe400: pushl %ecx Wine-dbg>stepi 0xffffe401: pushl %edx Wine-dbg>stepi 0xffffe402: pushl %ebp Wine-dbg>stepi 0xffffe403: movl %esp,%ebp Wine-dbg>stepi 0xffffe405: sysenter Wine-dbg>stepi err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code 80000003 flags 0 addr 0xffffe410 0xffffe410: -- no code accessible -- Wine-dbg>bt Backtrace: Exception c0000005 Wine-dbg>list 492 SERVER_START_REQ( get_handle_fd ) 493 { 494 req->handle = handle; 495 req->access = access; 496 if (!(ret = wine_server_call( req ))) 497 { 498 fd = reply->fd; 499 removable = reply->removable; 500 if (flags) *flags = reply->flags; 501 } 502 } Wine-dbg>info exception Exception frames: Can't read TEB:except_frame Wine-dbg>info wnd Window handle Class Name Style WndProc Thread Text 00050020 #32769 96000000 00000000 00000039 -- Empty -- 00050022 Shell_TrayWnd 04c00000 00000000 00000039 Wine Systray L Wine-dbg>info regs Register dump: CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:1007 GS:0033 EIP:ffffe410 ESP:7fa2fb5c EBP:7fa2fc4c EFLAGS:00200246( - 00 - IZP1) EAX:00000040 EBX:00000003 ECX:7fa2fc7c EDX:00000040 ESI:00000004 EDI:00000000 Wine-dbg>stepi Cannot set ctx on 55 Process of pid=0x00000036 has terminated **************************************************************** at least i got some indication of an error, if i run program with wine i only get carige return. Seems systray if sabotaged by wine-server, or wine-server can't latch on to the handle, i'm confused. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3527] Commandline pipes
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3527 ------- Additional Comments From frans.kool(a)gmail.com 2006-16-03 04:47 ------- I checked this behavior, and indeed it happens. In Windows, both dir /b > bla.txt and dir > bla.txt /b produce the same content but in Wine it seems to ignore any parameters after the pipe. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4663] ypops no longer runs under wine 0.9.8, it ran perfectly under wine 0.9.7 and earlyer
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 ------- Additional Comments From multescugeorge(a)yahoo.com 2006-16-03 03:22 ------- Tried wine 0.9.10, CVS from 16.03.2006, bug is still there, alive and kicking. (Doesn't matter if i run it as normal user eighter) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4663] ypops no longer runs under wine 0.9.8, it ran perfectly under wine 0.9.7 and earlyer
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 ------- Additional Comments From multescugeorge(a)yahoo.com 2006-16-03 00:55 ------- I normally run it as a normal user, but for testing compile-ing and troubleshooting purpuses i run it as root to be sure i don't get permission denied or other kind of similar errors. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4506] Unhandled exception: page fault on read access
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4506 ------- Additional Comments From wijn(a)wanadoo.nl 2006-16-03 00:34 ------- A different fix finally made it into wine 0.9.10. If you can confirm that this is also working correcty, the bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4853] New: Regression: new systray implementation doesn't work with flashget
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4853 Summary: Regression: new systray implementation doesn't work with flashget Product: Wine Version: 0.9.9. Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-msi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: qingdao33122(a)yahoo.com With the 0.9.9 version of wine, my flashget won't start anymore. On start up, it displays a message box saying "failed to create empty document". The first debug message I noticed is a timeout when starting "explorer /systray". So I fixed the TIMEOUT value, and the message disappears. But flashget still gave me the same complaint. After a lot of tracing, I found out that it's because of a special case that wine handles differently than Windows. The special case being: When an app calls Shell_NotifyIcon, it passes to wine a NOTIFYICONDATA struct. In this struct there's a uFlags field indicating what other fields are valid. By valid it means it actually fills the field with some value. Usually it also means the value itself is valid. Except that an app can pass a NULL hIcon to this api call. On Windows the shell just displays a blank icon. On current wine implementation, this api call fails. if (nid->uFlags & NIF_ICON) { ..... if (!GetIconInfo(nid->hIcon, &iconinfo)) return FALSE; -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4849] AppDB displays maintainer version incorrectly since 0.9.10 was added
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4849 ------- Additional Comments From jbdubbs(a)gmail.com 2006-15-03 22:13 ------- Ok, the list is reverted, but the damage is still done. We now have new testing results that contain no version or the 0.9. in error. I'm not sure how much was updated while the list was changed. Should we worry about it? Should be easy to fix with the proper permissions, which I don't have. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4849] AppDB displays maintainer version incorrectly since 0.9.10 was added
by Wine Bugs 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4849 tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com 2006-15-03 22:04 ------- I have changed back the versions for now -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0