August 2009 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 625] lotus organizer can't load dlls from custom folder
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Comment #7 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-08-09 15:39:33 --- OK, under Windows, Organizer (not Approach as I first stupidly said) does not append the PATH variable. So it must use another method to find it's DLLs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 625] lotus organizer can't load dlls from custom folder
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625 --- Comment #6 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-08-09 12:39:58 --- The usual. Shortcut uses: env WINEPREFIX="/home/test/.wine" wine "C:\lotus\organize\org32.exe" /LEN but nothing happens of course. Or, CD to folder, "wine org32.exe" err:module:import_dll Library LTSCSN10.DLL (which is needed by L"C:\\lotus\\organize\\TZBACK32.dll") not found err:module:import_dll Library LTASWN14.DLL (which is needed by L"C:\\lotus\\organize\\TZBACK32.dll") not found err:module:import_dll Library LTASBN14.DLL (which is needed by L"C:\\lotus\\organize\\TZBACK32.dll") not found ...and so on. DLLs are in c:\lotus\compnent. Adding the path fixes the problem. Similar story with S103. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 625] lotus organizer can't load dlls from custom folder
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625 --- Comment #5 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2009-08-09 12:35:15 --- You ran it how? With what exact command? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 18254] New: S103 can not find Toolbook 5
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18254 Summary: S103 can not find Toolbook 5 Product: Wine Version: 1.1.20 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Created an attachment (id=20779) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20779) Screenshot of error S103 Discovering Science is an Open University course application. It installs Toolbook 5.0 in its own directory during installation. Toolbook is launched from within the S103 application but immediately fails with message: "Failed initializing the book file manager. Make sure the file TB50NET.EXE is available in your PATH. If failure continues, close other applications or increase conventional memory." This works fine under Windows XP. Workaround is adding "C:\S103\TB50RUN;" to the PATH environment variable. Not sure how to do this with .reg file, which would make the workaround easier. Only output in the console is this: fixme:hook:SetWindowsHookEx16 System-global hooks (7) broken in Win16 Installing Toolbook 5 separately does not help either (still a PATH problem). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 625] lotus organizer can't load dlls from custom folder
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625 --- Comment #4 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-08-09 12:23:33 --- *** Bug 18254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 19330] New: World of warcraft Battle.net username conversion bug
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19330 Summary: World of warcraft Battle.net username conversion bug Product: Wine Version: 1.0.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: garymann1001(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=22384) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22384) Command line output. There seems to be a issue when attempting to connect to a world of warcraft account after doing the battle.net username conversion. There is a new battle.net deal going on allowing you to link all your blizzard games to a single account, which is a email address, after doing this each time I attempt to connect to that particular world of warcraft account the game crashes and displays a MS Visual runtime error. When attempting to connect to a regular warcraft account, it is not a issue. As far as I know this is a issue with all versions of Wine, I have attempted to try it on 1.1.25 and the Stable release 1.0.1. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 625] lotus organizer can't load dlls from custom folder
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED URL|http://appdb.winehq.org/app | |view.php?appId=944 | CC| |kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Resolution|FIXED | Severity|critical |major --- Comment #3 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-08-09 12:22:37 --- I don't think this is critical, so reducing to major. I also don't know why this is closed fixed. This is still an issue in latest git (Wine 1.1.27). Lotus Approach 97 can not find its own DLLs which it drops in c:\lotus\compnent The OU's S103 can not find Toolbook 5 which it drops into c:\s103\tb50run This basically affects any app that looks for a component not specified by the PATH variable. Under Windows, this isn't a problem. Either the PATH isn't being appended during installation, or something isn't being passed by the loader for it to look in the correct place. Adding the paths to HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Environment\PATH is a workaround. Will check on a Windows installation and update asap. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9063] AppDB note editor whitespace generation
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9063 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex(a)thehandofagony.com --- Comment #3 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2009-08-09 11:14:17 --- Yes. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 6266] Users can enter empty 'what works', 'what doesn't' and 'what was not tested fields.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6266 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex(a)thehandofagony.com --- Comment #5 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2009-08-09 11:11:02 --- "What doesn't work" is allowed to be empty if the rating is set to Platinum. This can be changed, if it leads to confusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 18460] New: Taking too long to type Test Data results in information being lost
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18460 Summary: Taking too long to type Test Data results in information being lost Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: daniel.santos(a)pobox.com I typed up a very lengthy Test Data report for Lord of the Rings Online only to hit preview and be redirected to the login page, I presume due to a session timeout. I logged in and it sent me back to the Add Test Data form with all of my information gone!!! Because arriving at this form used a POST and not GET (I presume that to be the reason) attempting to return via my browser's history was also unsuccessful as I was prompted that it would have to resubmit the form to display the page and I agreed. I set the initial severity to major, although I'm sure you guys have your own measures for bug severity. The reason I did this is because it resulted in the loss of about 30 minutes or more of work in detailing my test and results. Many people who run into this error will not bother to submit a bug report, and in fact, will probably just get frustrated and give up -- this is very bad. Perhaps the number of times this has occurred can be ascertained by examining the server logs and look for a URL pattern that indicates a submission of Test Data where a session had expired. I understand if you want to keep the session timeout low. But at a minimum, the submitted data MUST NOT BE LOST, no matter what! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5