January 2011 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 16886] New: .NET 3.0: WCF installer requires ChangeServiceConfig2 with SERVICE_CONFIG_FAILURE_ACTIONS support
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16886 Summary: .NET 3.0: WCF installer requires ChangeServiceConfig2 with SERVICE_CONFIG_FAILURE_ACTIONS support Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID =10cc340b-f857-4a14-83f5-25634c3bf043 OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: advapi32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, actually bug 16883 contained two bugs and this one slipped through. ChangeServiceConfig2W API needs SERVICE_CONFIG_FAILURE_ACTIONS support. --- 1. clean WINEPREFIX 2. sh mywinetricks -q wmicore 3. sh winetricks -q dotnet20 4. download .NET 3.0 Framework installer from: http://download.microsoft.com /download/4/d/a/4da3a5fa-ee6a-42b8-8bfa-ea5c4a458a7d/dotnetfx3setup.exe (sha1sum: a566bcd2ffffc3842a95adc57f7df3f8cd11577f) 5. export _SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST=1 (workaround, see bug 9158) 6. wine ./dotnetfx3setup.exe It might take a while until all required packages are downloaded using BITS. Note: If you need to redo steps, backup the directory "dotnetfx304506.30" from "c:\\windows\\temp" to a different location, remove ~/.wine, copy "dotnetfx304506.30" again to "c:\\windows\\temp" to prevent BITS from downloading over and over again. --- Relevant log: --- snip --- ServiceModelReg [16:55:11:288]: Repairing: Windows CardSpace (idsvc) ServiceModelReg [16:55:11:307]: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at System.ServiceModel.Install.NativeMethods.ChangeFailureActions(ServiceHandle hService, Int32 dwInfoLevel, SERVICE_FAILURE_ACTIONS& lpInfo) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceHandle.SetFailureActions(TimeSpan resetPeriod, TimeSpan[] restartPeriods) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceInstallComponent.OnInstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at System.ServiceModel.Install.InfoCardServiceInstallComponent.OnInstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceInstallComponent.Reinstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.PerformAction(ActionItem actionItem, Nullable`1 confirmUninstall) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.Run(String[] args) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.TryRun(String[] args) === Verbose logging stopped: 1/11/2009 16:55:11 === --- snip --- After fleshing out programs/services/svcctl_ChangeServiceConfig2W() a bit the problem is prevented (fake seems also ok). Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 16891] New: .NET 3.0: Windows Workflow Foundation installer claims .NET 2.0 Framework needed, MsiNetAssemblySupport/msi fusion version retrieval bug
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 Summary: .NET 3.0: Windows Workflow Foundation installer claims .NET 2.0 Framework needed, MsiNetAssemblySupport/msi fusion version retrieval bug Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID =10cc340b-f857-4a14-83f5-25634c3bf043 OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, after getting past bug 16888 another subinstaller "Windows Workflow Foundation" fails, claiming ".NET 2.0 Framework is required". This is of course already installed as part of prerequisite. Prerequisites: --- 1. clean WINEPREFIX 2. sh mywinetricks -q wmicore 3. sh winetricks -q dotnet20 4. download .NET 3.0 Framework installer from: http://download.microsoft.com /download/4/d/a/4da3a5fa-ee6a-42b8-8bfa-ea5c4a458a7d/dotnetfx3setup.exe (sha1sum: a566bcd2ffffc3842a95adc57f7df3f8cd11577f) 5. export _SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST=1 (workaround, see bug 9158) 6. wine ./dotnetfx3setup.exe It might take a while until all required packages are downloaded using BITS. Note: If you need to redo steps, backup the directory "dotnetfx304506.30" from "c:\\windows\\temp" to a different location, remove ~/.wine, copy "dotnetfx304506.30" again to "c:\\windows\\temp" to prevent BITS from downloading over and over again. --- The corresponding logfile "dd_WF_3.0_x86retMSI48DE.txt" reveals nothing, it's empty. Using ORCA on "WF_3.0_x86.msi" shows that MsiNetAssemblySupport >="2.0.50727" condition needs to be satisfied. The "MsiNetAssemblySupport" property should be set in set_msi_assembly_prop() but it doesn't seem so. Trace log shows: --- snip --- 0016:Call version.GetFileVersionInfoSizeW(00149050 L"C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v3.0\\fusion.dll",0032f2d0) ret=6024ad80 0016:Call KERNEL32.GetModuleHandleExW(00000000,00149050,0032ef90) ret=609ecc77 0016:Ret KERNEL32.GetModuleHandleExW() retval=00000000 ret=609ecc77 0016:Call KERNEL32.LoadLibraryExW(00149050 L"C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v3.0\\fusion.dll",00000000,00000002) ret=609ecc99 0016:Call PE DLL (proc=0x60c431f0,module=0x60c40000 L"psapi.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) ... 0016:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x60bd98c4,module=0x60bd0000 L"fusion.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) retval=1 0016:Ret KERNEL32.LoadLibraryExW() retval=60bd0000 ret=609ecc99 0016:Call KERNEL32.FindResourceW(60bd0000,00000001,00000010) ret=609ecd25 0016:Ret KERNEL32.FindResourceW() retval=00000000 ret=609ecd25 0016:Call KERNEL32.FreeLibrary(60bd0000) ret=609ecd94 ... 0016:Ret KERNEL32.FreeLibrary() retval=00000001 ret=609ecd94 0016:Call KERNEL32.SetLastError(00000714) ret=609ed6e6 0016:Ret KERNEL32.SetLastError() retval=00000714 ret=609ed6e6 0016:Ret version.GetFileVersionInfoSizeW() retval=00000000 ret=6024ad80 --- snip --- Looking into "C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v3.0\\fusion.dll" path there is no native fusion.dll. Hence Wine's builtin fusion.dll is loaded by LoadLibraryExW(). The builtin fusion doesn't contain version resource so it fails. This is a subtile problem: adding version resource to Wine's fusion might cause problems because every .NET Framework might ship it's own version of fusion which ought to override builtin fusion. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370325.aspx Usually: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\fusion.dll C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\fusion.dll AFAIK .NET 3.0 and 3.5 don't bring their own fusion version (someone might check a real Windows installation with these Frameworks present). The problem is how dlls/msi/package.c:get_fusion_filename() works. At the point where the installation fails the following registry data is present at the location get_fusion_filename() reads: --- snip --- [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v2.0.50727] "Increment"="42" "Install"=dword:00000001 "MSI"=dword:00000001 "SP"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v2.0.50727\1033] "Install"=dword:00000001 "MSI"=dword:00000001 "SP"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\Windows Communication Foundation] "InstallSuccess"=dword:00000001 "ReferenceInstallPath"="C:\\Program Files\\Reference Assemblies\\Microsoft\\Framework\\v3.0\\" "RuntimeInstallPath"="C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v3.0\\Windows Communication Foundation\\" "Version"="3.0.04506.30" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v3.0\Setup\Windows Presentation Foundation] @="Windows Presentation Foundation" "InstallRoot"="C:\\windows\\Microsoft.Net\\Framework\\v3.0\\WPF\\" "InstallSuccess"=dword:00000001 "ProductVersion"="3.0.6920.0" "Version"="3.0.6920.0" "WPFCommonAssembliesPathx86"="C:\\windows\\system32\\" "WPFNonReferenceAssembliesPathx86"="C:\\windows\\Microsoft.Net\\Framework\\v3.0\\WPF\\" "WPFReferenceAssembliesPathx86"="C:\\Program Files\\Reference Assemblies\\Microsoft\\Framework\\v3.0\\" --- snip --- I don't know how Windows msi does MsiNetAssemblySupport. Maybe a check for real existence of (native) fusion.dll to prevent false load of "builtin" fusion is better. If native fusion is not present in full path, that .NET Framework subkey data (version) can't be used for MsiNetAssemblySupport property. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 16888] New: .NET 3.0: WCF installer requires httpapi.dll with some stubs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16888 Summary: .NET 3.0: WCF installer requires httpapi.dll with some stubs Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID =10cc340b-f857-4a14-83f5-25634c3bf043 OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, after getting past bug 16883 the next one... Prerequisites: --- 1. clean WINEPREFIX 2. sh mywinetricks -q wmicore 3. sh winetricks -q dotnet20 4. download .NET 3.0 Framework installer from: http://download.microsoft.com /download/4/d/a/4da3a5fa-ee6a-42b8-8bfa-ea5c4a458a7d/dotnetfx3setup.exe (sha1sum: a566bcd2ffffc3842a95adc57f7df3f8cd11577f) 5. export _SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST=1 (workaround, see bug 9158) 6. wine ./dotnetfx3setup.exe It might take a while until all required packages are downloaded using BITS. Note: If you need to redo steps, backup the directory "dotnetfx304506.30" from "c:\\windows\\temp" to a different location, remove ~/.wine, copy "dotnetfx304506.30" again to "c:\\windows\\temp" to prevent BITS from downloading over and over again. --- The WCF installer still fails: --- snip --- ServiceModelReg [15:38:17:256]: Repairing: Net.Tcp Port Sharing Service (NetTcpPortSharing) ServiceModelReg [15:38:17:279]: Uninstalling: HTTP Namespace Reservations ServiceModelReg [15:38:17:294]: System.DllNotFoundException: Unable to load DLL 'httpapi.dll': Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E at System.ServiceModel.Install.NativeMethods.HttpTerminate(Int32 Flags, IntPtr pReserved) at System.ServiceModel.Install.HttpNamespaceReservationInstallComponent.get_IsInstalled() at System.ServiceModel.Install.HttpNamespaceReservationInstallComponent.Uninstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceModelInstallComponent.Reinstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.PerformAction(ActionItem actionItem, Nullable`1 confirmUninstall) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.Run(String[] args) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.TryRun(String[] args) === Verbose logging stopped: 1/11/2009 15:38:17 === --- snip --- Native httpapi override makes things only worse since it expects http service present ... --- snip --- ... 0035:CALL HTTPAPI.HttpInitialize(<unknown, check return>) ret=036a22c0 0035:trace:ntdll:NtCreateFile handle=0x67a16094 access=c0100000 name=L"\\Device\\Http\\Control" objattr=00000040 root=(nil) sec=(nil) io=0x33ed54 alloc_size=(nil) attr=00000000 sharing=00000003 disp=1 options=00000000 ea=0x18fb28.0x0000001f 0035:trace:service:OpenSCManagerW ((null),(null),0x00000001) 0035:trace:service:sc_handle_alloc sc_handle type=0 -> 0x18fb28 ... 0013:trace:service:svcctl_OpenSCManagerW ((null), (null), 1) ... 0035:trace:service:OpenSCManagerW returning 0x18fb28 (access : 0x00000001) 0035:trace:service:OpenServiceW 0x18fb28 L"HTTP" 20 0035:trace:service:sc_handle_alloc sc_handle type=1 -> 0x18f658 ... 0018:trace:service:svcctl_OpenServiceW (L"HTTP", 0x14) ... 0035:trace:service:sc_handle_destroy_service destroying service 0x18f658 0035:trace:service:CloseServiceHandle 0x18fb28 ... 0035:trace:service:sc_handle_destroy_manager destroying SC Manager 0x18fb28 0035:RET HTTPAPI.HttpInitialize(00000001,00000002,00000000) retval=00000003 ret=036a22c0 ... Uninstalling: HTTP Namespace Reservations Error: Path not found fixme:advapi:RegisterEventSourceW (L".",L"System.ServiceModel.Install 3.0.0.0"): stub fixme:advapi:ReportEventW (0xcafe4242,0x0001,0x0000,0x00000000,(nil),0x0001,0x00000000,0xa534b4,0xa5335c): stub err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: Path not found\r\n at System.ServiceModel.Install.HttpNamespaceReservationInstallComponent.get_IsInstalled()\r\n at System.ServiceModel.Install.HttpNamespaceReservationInstallComponent.Uninstall(OutputLevel outputLevel)\r\n at System.ServiceModel.Install.Se"... fixme:advapi:DeregisterEventSource (0xcafe4242) stub err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1603 ... --- snip --- It seems better to provide a simple httpapi stub dll. MSDN for more info (only version 1 API seems requested): http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364627.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364625.aspx After generating a stub dll with winedump and some trial & error sessions, the minimum required stubs are as follows: --- snip --- HttpDeleteServiceConfiguration -> return NO_ERROR (0) HttpInitialize -> return NO_ERROR (0) HttpQueryServiceConfiguration -> return ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND (2) (most likely means the service not installed, passed args can be left untouched with this error) HttpSetServiceConfiguration -> return NO_ERROR (0) HttpTerminate -> return NO_ERROR (0) --- snip --- With those stubs in place, the HTTP api related actions (fake) succeed. --- snip --- ServiceModelReg [16:30:52:470]: Uninstalling: HTTP Namespace Reservations ServiceModelReg [16:30:52:472]: Warning: HTTP namespace reservations are not installed. ServiceModelReg [16:30:52:472]: Installing: HTTP Namespace Reservations ServiceModelReg [16:30:52:473]: Information: The ServiceModelReg tool has completed successfully. --- snip --- and the WCF installer claims success. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 12

[Bug 16883] New: .NET 3.0: WCF installer fails due bug in services.exe svcctl_GetServiceKeyNameW
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16883 Summary: .NET 3.0: WCF installer fails due bug in services.exe svcctl_GetServiceKeyNameW Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID =10cc340b-f857-4a14-83f5-25634c3bf043 OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, after getting past bug 16882 (WMI is needed) we resume where we left: bug 16878 --- 1. clean WINEPREFIX 2. sh mywinetricks -q wmicore 3. sh winetricks -q dotnet20 4. download .NET 3.0 Framework installer from: http://download.microsoft.com /download/4/d/a/4da3a5fa-ee6a-42b8-8bfa-ea5c4a458a7d/dotnetfx3setup.exe (sha1sum: a566bcd2ffffc3842a95adc57f7df3f8cd11577f) 5. export _SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST=1 (workaround, see bug 9158) 6. wine ./dotnetfx3setup.exe It might take a while until all required packages are downloaded using BITS. Note: If you need to redo steps, backup the directory "dotnetfx304506.30" from "c:\\windows\\temp" to a different location, remove ~/.wine, copy "dotnetfx304506.30" again to "c:\\windows\\temp" to prevent BITS from downloading over and over again. --- The WCF installer still fails: "c:\\windows\\temp\\dd_dotnetfx3error.txt": --- snip --- [01/11/09,14:18:10] Windows Communication Foundation: [2] Error: Installation failed for component Windows Communication Foundation. MSI returned error code 1603 [01/11/09,14:18:21] WapUI: [2] DepCheck indicates Windows Communication Foundation is not installed. --- snip --- "c:\\windows\\temp\\dd_wcf_retMSI1CB9.txt": --- snip --- 1: C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModelReg.exe /r /x /y /v 2: 1: ERROR: Process returned non-0 value! CMDLINE: C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModelReg.exe /r /x /y /v 2: 1: Failed 2: --- snip --- --- snip --- ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:203]: Starting tool 'C:\windows\system32\wbem\mofcomp.exe' with parameters '"C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModel.mof"'. ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:328]: Microsoft (R) 32-bit MOF Compiler Version 1.50.1085.0001 ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:329]: Copyright (c) Microsoft Corp. 1997-1999. All rights reserved. ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:423]: ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:425]: Parsing MOF file: C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModel.mof ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:446]: MOF file has been successfully parsed ServiceModelReg [14:18:09:447]: Storing data in the repository... ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:115]: An error occurred while creating object 3 defined on lines 20 - 24: ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:116]: 0X80041002 Class, instance, or property 'HostingModel' was not found. ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:122]: Compiler returned error 0x80041001 ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:122]: ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:122]: ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:124]: Tool 'C:\windows\system32\wbem\mofcomp.exe' with parameters '"C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModel.mof"' exited with code '3'. ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:166]: Warning: Failure executing "C:\windows\system32\wbem\mofcomp.exe" with parameters ""C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModel.mof"": System.ApplicationException: Unexpected result 3 executing C:\windows\system32\wbem\mofcomp.exe with "C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModel.mof" at System.ServiceModel.Install.InstallHelper.ExecuteWait(String program, String parameters, Int32[] allowedExitCodes) at System.ServiceModel.Install.WmiInstallComponent.OnInstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:231]: Error: WMI classes are not installed. ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:233]: Repairing: Windows CardSpace (idsvc) ServiceModelReg [14:18:10:251]: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at System.ServiceModel.Install.NativeMethods.ChangeFailureActions(ServiceHandle hService, Int32 dwInfoLevel, SERVICE_FAILURE_ACTIONS& lpInfo) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceHandle.SetFailureActions(TimeSpan resetPeriod, TimeSpan[] restartPeriods) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceInstallComponent.OnInstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at System.ServiceModel.Install.InfoCardServiceInstallComponent.OnInstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at System.ServiceModel.Install.ServiceInstallComponent.Reinstall(OutputLevel outputLevel) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.PerformAction(ActionItem actionItem, Nullable`1 confirmUninstall) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.Run(String[] args) at Microsoft.Tools.ServiceModel.ServiceModelReg.TryRun(String[] args) === Verbose logging stopped: 1/11/2009 14:18:10 === --- snip --- Ok, lets leave the WMI failures aside (despite having native WMI core installed) and see how far it goes. That infocard service (re)install looks bugged: --- snip --- 0035:trace:service:OpenSCManagerW ((null),(null),0x00000001) 0035:trace:service:sc_handle_alloc sc_handle type=0 -> 0x18ef38 0013:trace:service:svcctl_OpenSCManagerW ((null), (null), 1) 0035:trace:service:OpenSCManagerW returning 0x18ef38 (access : 0x00000001) 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e808d5 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=0017b820 ret=79e808d5 0035:trace:service:GetServiceKeyNameW 0x18ef38 L"" 0x88e170 0x33f1f0 0014:trace:service:svcctl_GetServiceKeyNameW (L"idsvc", 256) 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e808d5 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=00a4333c ret=79e808d5 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e808d5 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=0017b820 ret=79e808d5 0035:trace:service:GetServiceDisplayNameW 0x18ef38 L"idsvc" 0x17b820 0x33f1f0 0013:trace:service:svcctl_GetServiceDisplayNameW (L"idsvc", 1) 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e808d5 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=00a4333c ret=79e808d5 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memset(0033f0c4,00000000,0000002c,0033f0bc) ret=79eef4cb 0035:RET MSVCR80.memset() retval=0033f0c4 ret=79eef4cb 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e770f8 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=0033f02c ret=79e770f8 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memset(0033ea2c,00000000,0000001c,0033ea70) ret=79e7d873 0035:RET MSVCR80.memset() retval=0033ea2c ret=79e7d873 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e808d5 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=0017b820 ret=79e808d5 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e808d5 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=00a4363c ret=79e808d5 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcpy() ret=79e770f8 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcpy() retval=0033f10c ret=79e770f8 0035:CALL MSVCR80.memcmp(008647a8,032e66b9,00000012) ret=79efee2f 0035:RET MSVCR80.memcmp() retval=00000000 ret=79efee2f 0035:trace:seh:raise_exception code=e0434f4d flags=1 addr=0x7b844f54 ip=0x7b844fd7 tid=0035 0035:trace:seh:raise_exception info[0]=80131509 0035:trace:seh:raise_exception eax=7b82cc91 ebx=7b8c3940 ecx=00000000 edx=0033f0f0 esi=0033f0f0 edi=e0434f4d 0035:trace:seh:raise_exception ebp=0033f0b8 esp=0033f054 cs=0023 ds=002b es=002b fs=0063 gs=006b flags=00000246 0035:trace:seh:call_stack_handlers calling handler at 0x79f9a3c8 code=e0434f4d flags=1 0035:CALL MSVCR80._except_handler4_common(7a381240,79e717fb,0033f064,0033f108,0033ecf0,0033eb90) ret=79f9a3e7 0035:RET MSVCR80._except_handler4_common() retval=00000001 ret=79f9a3e7 0035:trace:seh:call_stack_handlers handler at 0x79f9a3c8 returned 1 0035:trace:seh:call_stack_handlers calling handler at 0x7a3197d4 code=e0434f4d flags=1 --- snip --- If we dump the corresponding SCM entry: --- snip --- 000d:trace:service:scmdatabase_load_services Loading service L"idsvc" 000d:trace:service:load_service_config Image path = L"\"C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v3.0\\Windows Communication Foundation\\infocard.exe\"" 000d:trace:service:load_service_config Group = (null) 000d:trace:service:load_service_config Service account name = L"LocalSystem" 000d:trace:service:load_service_config Display name = L"Windows CardSpace" 000d:trace:service:load_service_config Service dependencies : (none) 000d:trace:service:load_service_config Group dependencies : (none) --- snip --- That GetServiceKeyNameW() API failure seems to be ok because the app passes the key name itself "idsvc" and not the service display name. The following GetServiceDisplayNameW() also fails, leading to app error/exception. If you look closer, you see svcctl_GetServiceDisplayNameW (L"idsvc", 1) -> buffer length "1" passed. This is clearly not what the app intended. The app reuses the length parameter from GetServiceKeyNameW(), passing it again into GetServiceDisplayNameW() but Wine changed it to "1" which seems incorrect. --- snip programs/services/rpc.c --- DWORD svcctl_GetServiceKeyNameW( SC_RPC_HANDLE hSCManager, LPCWSTR lpServiceDisplayName, WCHAR *lpBuffer, DWORD cchBufSize, DWORD *cchLength) { ... entry = scmdatabase_find_service_by_displayname(manager->db, lpServiceDisplayName); if (entry != NULL) { ... else { *cchLength = 1; err = ERROR_SERVICE_DOES_NOT_EXIST; } scmdatabase_unlock(manager->db); if (err != ERROR_SUCCESS && cchBufSize > 0) lpBuffer[0] = 0; return err; } --- snip programs/services/rpc.c -- This doesn't look right, a conformance test case should reveal the correct behaviour. I already verified this with a patch. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 12

[Bug 16893] New: .NET 3.0: Windows Workflow Foundation post-install: loadperf needs LoadPerfCounterTextStringsA/W stubs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16893 Summary: .NET 3.0: Windows Workflow Foundation post-install: loadperf needs LoadPerfCounterTextStringsA/W stubs Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID =10cc340b-f857-4a14-83f5-25634c3bf043 OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, after getting past bug 16891 the WF post install fails while running performance counter registration. Thanks to recent fixture of bug 12099 we have loadperf dll already in place... --- snip --- ... wine: Call from 0x7b844f54 to unimplemented function loadperf.dll.LoadPerfCounterTextStringsW, aborting fixme:advapi:CheckTokenMembership (0x188 0x1baf48 0x33e2c8) stub! fixme:imm:ImmDisableIME (-1): stub fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread Cannot get kerneltime or usertime of other threads fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread info class 9 not supported yet fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread info class 9 not supported yet fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread info class 9 not supported yet fixme:advapi:RegisterEventSourceW ((null),L".NET Runtime 2.0 Error Reporting"): stub fixme:advapi:ReportEventW (0xcafe4242,0x0001,0x0000,0x000003e8,(nil),0x0008,0x0000011a,0x3009a1b4,0x7ed505c0): stub err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"performancecounterinstaller.exe" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"3.0.4203.2" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"44c6ca00" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"kernel32.dll" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"5.1.2600.2180" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"00000000" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"0" err:eventlog:ReportEventW L"00024f54" fixme:advapi:DeregisterEventSource (0xcafe4242) stub fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread info class 9 not supported yet fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread info class 9 not supported yet fixme:thread:NtQueryInformationThread info class 9 not supported yet Unhandled Exception: System.Runtime.InteropServices.SEHException: External component has thrown an exception. at System.Workflow.NativeMethods.LoadPerfCounterTextStrings(String commandLine, Boolean quietMode) at System.Workflow.PerformanceCounterInstaller.Install() at System.Workflow.PerformanceCounterInstaller.Main(String[] args) wine: Unimplemented function loadperf.dll.LoadPerfCounterTextStringsW called at address 0x7b844f54 (thread 000c), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: unimplemented function loadperf.dll.LoadPerfCounterTextStringsW called in 32-bit code (0x7b844fd7). --- snip --- To reproduce this problem manually, execute the following: --- snip --- $ pwd /home/focht/.wine/drive_c/windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.0/Windows Workflow Foundation $ wine ./PerformanceCounterInstaller.exe uninstall ... $ wine ./PerformanceCounterInstaller.exe install --- snip --- The uninstall step is needed otherwise the registry keys are not explicitly removed and "install" will short-circuit, not doing anything useful. With stubs to loadperf added in similar manner like UnloadPerfCounterTextStringsA/W, we can get past this: --- snip --- $ WINEDEBUG=+tid,+seh,+loadperf wine ./PerformanceCounterInstaller.exe install ... 0009:trace:loadperf:DllMain (0x0x60cb0000, 1, (nil)) 0009:fixme:loadperf:LoadPerfCounterTextStringsW (L" \"C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v3.0\\Windows Workflow Foundation\\PerfCounters.ini\"", 1): stub ... --- snip --- Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 11

[Bug 25153] New: Windows Live Essentials beta (webc variant) won't install without native .NET
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25153 Summary: Windows Live Essentials beta (webc variant) won't install without native .NET Product: Wine Version: 1.3.7 Platform: x86-64 URL: http://wl.dlservice.microsoft.com/download/B/2/9/B2954 09B-AAAB-4415-B32D-A36EFD6DC36E/en/wlsetup-webc.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: RandomAccountName(a)mail.com Created an attachment (id=31904) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=31904) Terminal output This particular installer isn't satisfied with "winetricks mono26 win7" even if the registry key from bug 24875 is added. It just says it needs .NET 3 and refuses to proceed any further without it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 25134] New: Windows Live Essentials 2011 refuses to install without native .NET
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Mar '21

21 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25134 Summary: Windows Live Essentials 2011 refuses to install without native .NET Product: Wine Version: 1.3.6 Platform: x86-64 URL: http://g.live.com/1rewlive4-web/en/wlsetup-web.exe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: RandomAccountName(a)mail.com Created an attachment (id=31883) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=31883) Terminal output The installer refuses to run after "winetricks mono26 win7" saying "Windows Live Essentials requires Microsoft .NET Framework 3." Note that it fails to run for other reasons in other Windows versions (either due to the OS being insufficient, or no platform update installed). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 21634] New: ACT!2010 installer prereq check fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Mar '21

21 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21634 Summary: ACT!2010 installer prereq check fails Product: Wine Version: 1.1.38 Platform: x86 URL: http://experience.act.com/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, Installer Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com I tested the downloadable trial of ACT!2010. The installer has sha1sum 3ce9033e20c79707d3798195c74cb8e8bd3b5731 ACT! by Sage.exe It probably needs winetricks dotnet20 first. It fails with message Prereq.Exceptions.KeyDoesn’tExistException: Exception of Type ‘Prereq.Exceptions.KeyDoestntExistException’ was thrown. at Prereq.AccessINI.GetValue(StringKey, StringValueName) at Prereq.Program.Main(String[] args). http://community.act.com/sage/board/message?board.id=ACT&thread.id=3715 says to check the log file C:\WINDOWS\Temp\ACTInstLog\ActWindows.log That file contains C:\users\Public\Application Data\Microsoft\Protect does not exist. which seems related to the Protected Storage service and lsass.exe, which Wine doesn't have yet. The app then spews several crash report dialogs. (The installer continues on anyway, and fails when installing SQL Express, but that's a different problem.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

[Bug 20651] New: Crash when installing Impulse
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Mar '21

21 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20651 Summary: Crash when installing Impulse Product: Wine Version: 1.1.32 Platform: PC-x86-64 URL: http://www.impulsedriven.com/downloads/impulse_setup.e xe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: drakkk(a)centrum.cz Created an attachment (id=24653) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24653) terminal output When installing Impulse with current git (wine-1.1.32-499-gffb2cfc), there is a crash in file setsdaff.exe, but installer continues and reports that it finished successfully. Another thing I noticed: after installation some processes remains in memory, they are mscorsvw.exe (disappear aprox. 5-10 later) and rpcss.exe (remains there until killed). Impulse needs dotnet20, I installed it with winetricks. After installation Impulse starts, but cannot connect to server, bug 15486. I did some search on the Stardock forums and it looks like even some windows users had similar problem, in their case this was caused by broken .NET install, .NET re-installation or update solved this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 51

[Bug 17902] New: ole32.CoGetClassObject: threads without apartment should use existing MTA
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Mar '21

21 Mar '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Summary: ole32.CoGetClassObject: threads without apartment should use existing MTA Product: Wine Version: 1.1.18 Platform: Other URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID =fe6f2099-b7b4-4f47-a244-c96d69c35dec OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, there are apps which use free threaded COM (inproc) servers and call CoGetClassObject() from (new) threads that do not explicitly initialize COM. This is valid behaviour when one of the existing threads already created the MTA by calling CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED). See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/150777 --- quote --- Current implementations of COM allow a thread that does not explicitly initialize COM to be a part of the MTA. A thread that does not initialize COM is part of the MTA only if it starts using COM after at least one other thread in the process has previously called CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED). (It is even possible that COM itself may have initialized the MTA when no client thread has explicitly done so; for example, a thread associated with an STA calls CoGetClassObject/CoCreateInstance[Ex] on a CLSID that is marked "ThreadingModel=Free" and COM implicitly creates an MTA into which the class object is loaded.) See the information on threading model interoperability below. However, this is a configuration that might cause problems, such as access violations, under certain circumstances. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that each thread that needs to do COM work initialize COM by calling CoInitializeEx and then, on completion of COM work, call CoUninitialize. The cost of "unnecessarily" initializing an MTA is minimal. --- quote --- An example app suffering from this is the managed console debugger from .NET 2.0 SDK "cordbg.exe": When trying to debug a simple console C# app created with symbols (.pdb format): --- snip --- wine "C:\\windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v2.0.50727\\csc.exe" /debug+ foo.cs --- snip --- Start debugger: --- snip --- wine "C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft.NET\\SDK\\v2.0\\Bin\\cordbg.exe foo.exe" --- snip --- The debugger will immediately begin to execute the app - not halting in Main() method (source). This is because symbol information can't be loaded using COR symbol binder which lives in a free threaded COM inproc server. 0A29FF9E-7F9C-4437-8B11-F424491E3931 -> CLSID_CorSymBinder Threads 0x38 (main) and 0x36 call "CoInitializeEx" with COINIT_MULTITHREADED, creating the MTA. Thread 0x3b is created later as pooled thread - part of MTA - to serve CLR debugger requests (work items). That thread never makes any init calls to COM (verified). --- snip --- ... 0038:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(60970000,7a37e2ae "CoInitializeEx") ret=79e9d311 0038:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=609750c8 ret=79e9d311 0038:Call ole32.CoInitializeEx(00000000,00000000) ret=79ebfba8 0038:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00110000,00000008,000000fc) ret=60986499 0038:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=0014f9c0 ret=60986499 0038:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00110000,00000000,00000028) ret=609a750c 0038:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=001500e8 ret=609a750c 0038:Call KERNEL32.InitializeCriticalSection(001500f8) ret=609a7543 0038:Ret KERNEL32.InitializeCriticalSection() retval=00000001 ret=609a7543 0038:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00110000,00000008,0000007c) ret=60983f54 0038:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=00151df0 ret=60983f54 0038:Call KERNEL32.InitializeCriticalSection(00151e10) ret=60983fb4 0038:Ret KERNEL32.InitializeCriticalSection() retval=00000001 ret=60983fb4 0038:Ret ole32.CoInitializeEx() retval=00000000 ret=79ebfba8 ... 0036:Call ole32.CoInitializeEx(00000000,00000000) ret=79ebfba8 0036:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00110000,00000008,000000fc) ret=60986499 0036:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=00151e78 ret=60986499 0036:Ret ole32.CoInitializeEx() retval=00000000 ret=79ebfba8 ... 003b:Call advapi32.RegOpenKeyExW(80000000,0310d170 L"CLSID\\{0A29FF9E-7F9C-4437-8B11-F424491E3931}\\InprocServer32",00000000,00020019,0310d0dc) ret=79ea5b8a 003b:Ret advapi32.RegOpenKeyExW() retval=00000000 ret=79ea5b8a 003b:Call ... 003b:Call advapi32.RegOpenKeyExW(00000238,0310d270 L"2.0.50727",00000000,00020019,0310d0ec) ret=79ea5b8a 003b:Ret advapi32.RegOpenKeyExW() retval=00000000 ret=79ea5b8a 003b:Call advapi32.RegQueryValueExW(0000023c,7a136a40 L"ImplementedInThisVersion",00000000,0310d0e4,00000000,0310d0e8) ret=79ea5bd0 003b:Ret advapi32.RegQueryValueExW() retval=00000000 ret=79ea5bd0 003b:Call advapi32.RegCloseKey(0000023c) ret=7a1369f2 003b:Ret advapi32.RegCloseKey() retval=00000000 ret=7a1369f2 ... 003b:Call advapi32.RegOpenKeyExW(80000000,0310d318 L"CLSID\\{0A29FF9E-7F9C-4437-8B11-F424491E3931}\\InprocServer32\\2.0.50727",00000000,00020019,0310d314) ret=79ea5b8a 003b:Ret advapi32.RegOpenKeyExW() retval=00000000 ret=79ea5b8a 003b:Call advapi32.RegQueryValueExW(00000238,79f873d0 L"Class",00000000,0310d2f8,00000000,0310d310) ret=79ea5bd0 003b:Ret advapi32.RegQueryValueExW() retval=00000002 ret=79ea5bd0 003b:Call advapi32.RegCloseKey(00000238) ret=79f88946 003b:Ret advapi32.RegCloseKey() retval=00000000 ret=79f88946 ... 003b:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(60970000,7a37e222 "CoGetClassObject") ret=79e9d311 003b:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=60974f78 ret=79e9d311 003b:Call ole32.CoGetClassObject(00175d3c,00000015,00000000,79f83a7c,0310d5e8) ret=7a041335 003b:err:ole:CoGetClassObject apartment not initialised 003b:Ret ole32.CoGetClassObject() retval=800401f0 ret=7a041335 003b:Call KERNEL32.GetLastError() ret=79e74ab4 003b:Ret KERNEL32.GetLastError() retval=0000007f ret=79e74ab4 000007f ret=78132d14 ... 003b:Call KERNEL32.FormatMessageW(000031ff,00000000,800401f0,00000400,0310d4f4,00000000,0310d4a0) ret=7a127c38 003b:Ret KERNEL32.FormatMessageW() retval=00000000 ret=7a127c38 --- quote --- The failure is due to Wine's CoGetClassObject() rejecting requests when no apartment in current thread (oletls) exists. --- snip dlls/ole32/compobj.c --- HRESULT WINAPI CoGetClassObject( REFCLSID rclsid, DWORD dwClsContext, COSERVERINFO *pServerInfo, REFIID iid, LPVOID *ppv) { LPUNKNOWN regClassObject; HRESULT hres = E_UNEXPECTED; APARTMENT *apt; TRACE("\n\tCLSID:\t%s,\n\tIID:\t%s\n", debugstr_guid(rclsid), debugstr_guid(iid)); if (!ppv) return E_INVALIDARG; *ppv = NULL; apt = COM_CurrentApt(); if (!apt) { ERR("apartment not initialised\n"); return CO_E_NOTINITIALIZED; } ... --- snip dlls/ole32/compobj.c --- Rather than failing CoGetClassObject() without apartment, it should look for an existing MTA and let the current thread use it. With the MTA being used, the inproc server is created and the app works as intended, e.g. symbols get loaded, source can be stepped ... Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 7