March 2014 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 32678] New: HQ Photo Resizer: Fails to start
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32678 Bug #: 32678 Summary: HQ Photo Resizer: Fails to start Product: Wine Version: 1.5.21 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: lukasz.wojnilowicz(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 43110 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=43110 Error message Steps to reproduce: 1) remove ~/.wine 2) install HQ Photo Resizer 3) wine Resizer.exe Behaviour: Error message, that says "success" (see 1st attachment) Expected behaviour: No error message. Additional information: 1) no terminal output 2) with WINEDEBUG=+relay there is an other error message (see 2nd attachment) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 11387] New: SMP/Dual core performing worse than single core
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11387 Summary: SMP/Dual core performing worse than single core Product: Wine Version: 0.9.54. Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jcollins(a)asgardsrealm.net I searched for another bug report on this but did not find anything. I've tested the same application on two similar systems with similar software loads. Essentially, the application (Majesty) preforms considerably better on a single core system than it does on a more powerful dual core system. Single Core System: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3300+ 1.5 Gig RAM GeForce 6200 256M Dual Core System: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ 2 Gig RAM GeForce 7800 256M Both systems are running Debian Etch, with kernel version 2.6.18-5-k7, NVIDIA GLX Module 100.14.19, and Wine 0.9.53 (using Scott's packages). I would expect the dual core system to run as well, if not better, than the single core system. However, it is extremely sluggish on the dual core system and blazingly fast (in some cases needing to be slowed down) on the single core. I have also tested the dual core system with 0.9.54 (built using Scott's 0.9.53 package as a basis), with no improvement. I'll happily provide any additional information that would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 29798] New: Cisco IP Communicator 8.6(1): crashes after Audiosetup
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29798 Bug #: 29798 Summary: Cisco IP Communicator 8.6(1): crashes after Audiosetup Product: Wine Version: 1.4-rc2 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: roger(a)gunis.de Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 38709 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=38709 Backtrace from the abort of the Wizzard Installing the Cisco IP Communicator worked fine. The first step is an audio configuration site. I could configure the Audio Devices and testing it. Unfortunately after testing the audios the wizzard could not be closed successful. Instead the wizzard fails and wine is reporting a problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 31725] New: The Sims 2 crashes
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31725 Bug #: 31725 Summary: The Sims 2 crashes Product: Wine Version: 1.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: thomas.mertes(a)gmx.at Classification: Unclassified Installing the Sims 2 worked, but starting it results in a crash. The program locks up. Using alt-tab reveals two error message popups (in german, because I use the german version called "Die Sims 2"): (X) Direct3D hat einen Fehler festgestellt: D3DERR_INVALID_CALL! Die Anwendung wird nun beendet. (X) Die Anwendung ist abgestürzt und wird nun beendet. Translation of the two error message popups: (X) Direct3D found an error: D3DERR_INVALID_CALL! The application will be terminated now. (X) The application crashed and will be terminated now. After waiting for several minutes I switched to a text console and killed the program. The console where I started the Sims 2 contains several log messages (see attachment). uname -a returns: Linux penguin 3.2.0-30-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 24 16:54:40 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux wine --version returns wine-1.4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 23996] New: alt.binz version 0.25.0 not loading
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23996 Summary: alt.binz version 0.25.0 not loading Product: Wine Version: 1.2 Platform: x86 URL: http://www.altbinz.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: leo_mancini(a)yahoo.com Created an attachment (id=30137) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=30137) Alt.binz 0.25.0 not working... Here is the error message Hi all, When loading alt.binz program, it does not load at all. and displays the error message as attached in the screenshot. It used to work prior to my upgrade to Opensuse 11.3 when I was using version 11.2 instead. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 18390] New: Roblox can't join a game
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18390 Summary: Roblox can't join a game Product: Wine Version: 1.1.20 Platform: Other URL: http://roblox.com OS/Version: other Status: NEW Keywords: download Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com After working around bug 18388 and bug 18389, trying to join a game fails; the browser says it can't start the game, and tells you to start the app (which you already did). On the console, one sees a suspicious error message from gecko: fixme:shdocvw:HttpNegotiate_BeginningTransaction (0x5c239a8)->(L"" L"" 0 0x33c794) 0[15c4c8]: file (null), line 0: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Unexpected error" nsresult: "0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED)" location: "JS frame :: http://www.roblox.com/ScriptResource.axd?d=lz2oPY8_Yxfc8W_Nr5tWGxJ8z2w_ENPF… :: anonymous :: line 2144" data: no] Possible workaround: launch games directly using e.g. wine roblox.exe -play http://www.roblox.com/Game/join.ashx?jobID=cc310936-d9bd-46a5-99cd-494d6b14… as mentioned at http://forums.roblox4linux.co.cc/index.php?topic=37.0 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 30147] New: mmdevapi: incorrect capture overrun handling
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30147 Bug #: 30147 Summary: mmdevapi: incorrect capture overrun handling Product: Wine Version: 1.3.25 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mmdevapi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: hoehle(a)users.sourceforge.net CC: m.b.lankhorst(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 39320 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=39320 mmdevapi capture test from native w7 machine Most wineXYZ audio drivers do not handle mmdevapi capture overrun correctly. In particular, the ALSA & OSS drivers randomly overwrite old with new data, depending on the read pointer within the capture buffer. Native roughly supports, with some quirks, a scenario like: Initialize(duration=Xms); Start; Sleep(X+Yms); /* Y extra spare time */ Stop; /* optional, buffer is full now */ repeat GetBuffer/ReleaseBuffer until (hr != S_OK); The goal is to obtain one buffer (~Xms) full of data. The attached log from a w7 machine shows what packet gets recorded at what time by tracing GetBuffer's performance counter output parameter (qpc). The key data points are: >capture.c:544: rate: 48000 >capture.c:293: GetBufferSize 23941 period size 480 >capture.c:248: Sleep.1 position 480 pad 16800 flags 0, frames locked: 480 >capture.c:250: sleep qpc=67335132 >capture.c:293: GetBufferSize 23941 period size 480 >capture.c:303: Overrun position 1440 pad 23941 flags 1, frames locked: 480 >capture.c:305: overrun qpc=67355139 This position and qpc jump of exactly one period I don't understand. >capture.c:331: Cont'ed position 1920 pad 23461 flags 0, frames locked: 480 >capture.c:333: cont'ed qpc=67365133 >qpc=67375139 0 position 2400 pad 22981 flags 0, next 480, frames locked: 480 >qpc=67385135 1 position 2880 pad 22501 flags 0, next 480, frames locked: 480 Note how position correlates with 10ms increments of qpc (in µs). >qpc=67795152 42 position 22560 pad 3301 flags 0, next 480, frames locked: 480 >qpc=67805153 43 position 23040 pad 2821 flags 0, next 480, frames locked: 480 >qpc=67815148 44 position 23520 pad 2341 flags 0, next 421, frames locked: 421 >qpc=67823919 45 position 23520 pad 1920 flags 0, next 59, frames locked: 59 >qpc=67825154 46 position 24000 pad 1861 flags 0, next 480, frames locked: 480 >qpc=67835147 47 position 24480 pad 1381 flags 1, next 421, frames locked: 421 >qpc=68085155 48 position 36480 pad 960 flags 1, next 480, frames locked: 480 >capture.c:352: Test failed: Valid IAudioCaptureClient_GetBuffer: 08890001 >qpc=68085155 49 position -1 pad 480 flags 1, next 0, frames locked: 0 qpc indicates that old packets are being delivered until iteration <48, where another position jump occurs. Summary: - I don't know where native's 23941 frames buffer comes from. It's neither a multiple of the period size nor of 1024. - Upon underrun, a DISCONTINUITY is immediately signaled and one packet is skipped. The latter is weird. (I'm wondering whether native overwrites one packet within the circular buffer as an overrun detector, then skips it?). + Then, almost a full buffer of old packets can be retrieved with GetBuffer. - While the full buffer is 49 * 480 + 421, only 48 * 480 + 421 frames can be retrieved with a qpc indicating pre-overrun times. - The last old packet is flagged with DISCONTINUITY too (iteration 47). I'd have expected solely the following one to bear this mark. + When there's room again in the buffer, GetBuffer yields new packets (iteration 48). Both position and qpc reflect the overrun gap that appears to have last for 250ms. DISCONTINUITY is set too. - There's some strange packet splitting at iterations 44-45 that may correspond to a wrap-around of native's buffer. I wonder why native does not limit buffer to multiples of period size. - Note that the position 23520 of the 59 frames fragment rest is the same as that of the previous 421 frames packet. A bug in native? The qpc is different and looks ok. + GetNextPacket exactly matches the following GetBuffer, even when it yields less than one packet, e.g. 421/59/480. - GetCurrentPadding >= period size does not imply a successful GetBuffer, see iteration 49. Only GetNextPacket correlates fine. A bug in native? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 30110] New: Mass effect steam
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30110 Bug #: 30110 Summary: Mass effect steam Product: Wine Version: 1.4-rc6 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: Monoboy4ik(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Game works fine but sometimes after 1-2 hours playing game freezes. No errors in the console does not appear. Help please -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 29809] New: Hype the Time Quest Installer Goes Over 100%
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29809 Bug #: 29809 Summary: Hype the Time Quest Installer Goes Over 100% Product: Wine Version: 1.3.16 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jthomas97411(a)yahoo.com Classification: Unclassified Wine 1.3.16 is as far back as I tested. For 1.3.16, 1.3.20, 1.4 rc 1, and 1.4 rc 2, if you uncheck the Microsoft DirectX Media check, this will allow the installer to succeed, whereas if you don't uncheck that, it will fail. When it fails (DirectX check left checked), it stops at about 100%. When it succeeds (DirectX check unchecked), it goes to 116%, in the case of the versions mentioned above. There were some versions there for a while, somewhere not too far after 1.3.29, that went to 117% when you didn't uncheck the DirectX test and they failed, and when you did uncheck the DirectX test, the installer stopped at 100% and succeeded. Whereas with these other versions it doesn't go over if you _don't_ uncheck it and does go over if you _do_ uncheck_ it. It still held true that unchecking let it succeed and leaving it checked caused it to fail. So this is a separate bug from the installer simply crashing. Notice how this is different than the DirectX check bug: 29806. This is about the installer going over 100%. I get this 9 times in terminal from when the installer crashes in the case of 1.3.16, 1.3.20, 1.4 rc 1, and 1.4 rc 2: fixme:advpack:ExecuteCabW Cab archive not extracted! Jake -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 30985] New: Event handling in external (non-default) monitor issue
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30985 Bug #: 30985 Summary: Event handling in external (non-default) monitor issue Product: Wine Version: 1.5.6 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: marco_silva85(a)sapo.pt Classification: Unclassified currently I have setup dual monitors when I execute an application with wine (ex. winecfg), it opens on the default monitor, if I drag it to the other monitor, wine stops handling events, it doesn't repaint it nor any keyboard/mouse events work (maybe it thinks its minimized). Notes: My DE is xfce. Native applications work well. Other xrandr configurations and resolutions have the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3