January 2015 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 37821] New: Wisterer HX freeze on sunday event
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 02 Jan '15

02 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37821 Bug ID: 37821 Summary: Wisterer HX freeze on sunday event Product: Wine Version: 1.7.33 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: sweepers(a)gmx.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 50371 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50371 console log calling "wine wistererhx.exe" Hi, found a problem in windows application "Wisterer HX" Version 4.2.32 It's a lightweight software for calendar management, diary, adress database, schedule and birthday reminder etc. Unfortunately only available in german, but i'll try to translate... Homepage is http://www.wisterer.de but the download is redirected to other sites. download zip with setup exe: http://www.chip.de/downloads/Wisterer-HX_13002426.html After running setup.exe, the application complains about missing dlls. I got it starting up by copying these files from win7 x64 directory C:\Windows\SysWOW64 to ~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Wisterer HX ab412429f1e5fb9708a8cdea07479099 COMDLG32.OCX 8bbc59ae8497d0bbee8d66b74c7db971 mfc40.dll ae47a8a5fe8193bb84ffcd338115d8ef MSCOMCT2.OCX e52859fcb7a827cacfce7963184c7d24 MSCOMCTL.OCX 4dc9752ba6418bbac12852bbcf0374cb MsgHoo32.OCX 9618e4752b19ce24efd729c662c8db1e msvbvm60.dll 045a16822822426c305ea7280270a3d6 Richtx32.ocx download zip with portable version: http://www.computerbild.de/download/Wisterer-HX-Portable-2775828.html 51f4e5042c7a71ace966d0b47c080eb0 portablewistererhx.zip This zip contains partly different versions of dlls above, but problem is the same. While with Wine 1.6.2 program crashed when clicking on "Anzeige -> Monatsanzeige Liste" (view full month), this is now fixed with latest version Wine 1.7.33 - thanks for that :) But one problem remains: go to "Kalender" -> "Neues Ereignis eingeben" (enter new event) then select the tab "monatlich" (monthly) find "Mittwoch" (wednesday) in the drop down menu. Only if "Sonntag" (sunday) is selected, the app freezes, 100% CPU. This action prepares an event to be scheduled every first sunday each month, so obviously some problem with day of week calculation. Same happens if an existing calendar file Kalender.wik is opened that contains sunday events. Thank you! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 5137] avifil32 limits itself to max of 1024 frames when writing avis
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 02 Jan '15

02 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5137 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |d28c40da3bc685241363370f4b4 | |86bd975396afc Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #18 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Fixed by: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/d28c40da3bc685241363370f4b… -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 6955] Multiple games need software vertex blending implementation (NOLF2, Divinity 2, Dark Age of Camelot, Warhammer Online, PSU:AOTI)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6955 JHaleIT <jhaleit(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jhaleit(a)gmail.com --- Comment #144 from JHaleIT <jhaleit(a)gmail.com> --- I can confirm that this bug exist in the latest version of Wine in WineBottler for Phantasy Star Universe. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 37816] New: Winetricks: asks to download ie6 from third-party source (inaccessible in China) when first-party source is available
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37816 Bug ID: 37816 Summary: Winetricks: asks to download ie6 from third-party source (inaccessible in China) when first-party source is available Product: Wine Version: 1.7.33 Hardware: x86 URL: http://www.oldversion.com/download-Internet-Explorer-6 .0.html OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: iamreggieman(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 50365 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50365 Terminal output from running 'winetricks ie6' When installing ie6 in Winetricks, it tells you to "download msie60.exe from http://www.oldversion.com/download-Internet-Explorer-6.0.html". This is a third-party source, there is a first-party source (Microsoft) available, listed on the AppDB: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=469 http://download.microsoft.com/download/ie6sp1/finrel/6_sp1/W98NT42KMeXP/EN-… The third-party source is inaccessible in China due to censorship. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 5908] Ability Office 4 doesn't start up?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

1 0

[Bug 37127] New: PVS-Studio Error: Unreliable tests
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37127 Bug ID: 37127 Summary: PVS-Studio Error: Unreliable tests Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lukebenes(a)hotmail.com PVS-Studio identifies Unreliable tests. Some of the modules' folders contain the test folder with source files for tests. Debug information is printed through the 'ok' macro. Here are a few suspicious fragments: V501 There are identical sub-expressions to the left and to the right of the '==' operator: ddsd3.lpSurface == ddsd3.lpSurface dsurface.c 272 ... ok(ddsd3.lpSurface == ddsd3.lpSurface, //<== "lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(%p) differs\ from the one returned by Lock(%p)\n", ddsd3.lpSurface, ddsd2.lpSurface); //<== ... It very much looks like a typo. I suspect this code should compare the same variables that are printed. V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. url.c 767 ... ok(size == no_callback ? 512 : 13, "size=%d\n", size); ... The precedence of the "==" operator is higher than that of '?:', so the size variable is not compared to the values 512 and 13. The expression is always true as it evaluates either to 512 or 13, which means this check doesn't check anything. Other similar fragments: V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. string.c 1086 V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. string.c 1111 V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. reader.c 761 V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. protocol.c 2928 V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. dde.c 1594 V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. reader.c 761 details on the V501 error here: http://www.viva64.com/en/d/0090/ details on the V502 error here: http://www.viva64.com/en/d/0091/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 37126] New: PVS-Studio Error: Printing the result of identical functions
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37126 Bug ID: 37126 Summary: PVS-Studio Error: Printing the result of identical functions Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lukebenes(a)hotmail.com PVS-Studio identifies Printing the result of identical functions Error,V681. The language standard does not define an order in which the 'tlb_read_byte' functions will be called during evaluation of arguments. tlb.c 650 ... printf("\\%2.2x \\%2.2x\n", tlb_read_byte(), tlb_read_byte()); ... According to the C++ language standard, the sequence of computing a function's actual arguments is not defined. Which function will be called first depends on the compiler, compilation parameters, etc. details on the V681 error here: http://www.viva64.com/en/d/0315/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 37123] New: PVS-Studio Error: Double type conversion
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37123 Bug ID: 37123 Summary: PVS-Studio Error: Double type conversion Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lukebenes(a)hotmail.com PVS-Studio identifies a Double type conversion Error. The *void pointer is cast to other types twice: first to char*, then to DWORD*, after which an offset is added. Either the expression lacks parentheses or the code is excessive. Whether or not there is an error here depends on how much the programmer wanted to increment the pointer. V650 Type casting operation is utilized 2 times in succession. Next, the '+' operation is executed. Probably meant: (T1)((T2)a + b). typelib.c 9147 ... struct WMSFT_SegContents arraydesc_seg; typedef struct tagWMSFT_SegContents { DWORD len; void *data; } WMSFT_SegContents; ... DWORD offs = file->arraydesc_seg.len; DWORD *encoded; encoded = (DWORD*)((char*)file->arraydesc_seg.data) + offs;//<== Another similar issue: V650 Type casting operation is utilized 2 times in succession. Next, the '+' operation is executed. Probably meant: (T1)((T2)a + b). protocol.c 194 INT WINAPI EnumProtocolsW(LPINT protocols, LPVOID buffer, LPDWORD buflen) { ... unsigned int string_offset; ... pi[i].lpProtocol = (WCHAR*)(char*)buffer + string_offset;//<== ... } details on the V650 error here: http://www.viva64.com/en/d/0269/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 37120] New: PVS-Studio Error: Equivalent branches of if operator
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37120 Bug ID: 37120 Summary: PVS-Studio Error: Equivalent branches of if operator Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lukebenes(a)hotmail.com Equivalent branches of if operator V523 The 'then' statement is equivalent to the 'else' statement. filedlg.c 3302 if(pDIStruct->itemID == liInfos->uSelectedItem) { ilItemImage = (HIMAGELIST) SHGetFileInfoW ( (LPCWSTR) tmpFolder->pidlItem, 0, &sfi, sizeof (sfi), shgfi_flags ); } else { ilItemImage = (HIMAGELIST) SHGetFileInfoW ( (LPCWSTR) tmpFolder->pidlItem, 0, &sfi, sizeof (sfi), shgfi_flags ); } This code is either excessive or contains a typo. V523 The 'then' statement is equivalent to the 'else' statement. genres.c 1130 ... if(win32) { put_word(res, 0); /* Reserved */ /* FIXME: The ResType in the NEWHEADER structure should * contain 14 according to the MS win32 doc. This is * not the case with the BRC compiler and I really doubt * the latter. Putting one here is compliant to win16 spec, * but who knows the true value? */ put_word(res, 1); /* ResType */ put_word(res, icog->nicon); for(ico = icog->iconlist; ico; ico = ico->next) { ... } } else /* win16 */ { put_word(res, 0); /* Reserved */ put_word(res, 1); /* ResType */ put_word(res, icog->nicon); for(ico = icog->iconlist; ico; ico = ico->next) { ... } } ... One of the repeating branches is commented. Perhaps this is an incomplete fragment, not an error, but I decided to point it out anyway. details on the V523 error here: http://www.viva64.com/en/d/0112/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 37119] New: PVS-Studio Error: Cascade of conditional operators
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37119 Bug ID: 37119 Summary: PVS-Studio Error: Cascade of conditional operators Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lukebenes(a)hotmail.com V517 The use of 'if (A) {...} else if (A) {...}' pattern was detected. There is a probability of logical error presence. Check lines: 1754, 1765. msi.c 1754 if (!strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_LOCALPACKAGEW )) //<== { ... } else if (!strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_INSTALLDATEW )) { ... } else if (!strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_LOCALPACKAGEW )) //<== { ... } else if (!strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_UNINSTALLABLEW ) || !strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_PATCHSTATEW ) || !strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_DISPLAYNAMEW ) || !strcmpW( szProperty, INSTALLPROPERTY_MOREINFOURLW )) { ... } else { ... } If identical conditions are checked in a cascade of conditional operators, those conditions never get control. Perhaps there is a typo in the constant INSTALLPROPERTY_* passed to this fragment. details on the V517 error here: http://www.viva64.com/en/d/0106/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5