November 2019 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 39419] New: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39419 Bug ID: 39419 Summary: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- There are two very common 'boterror' types: Failure running script in VM: the "nc -q0 '10.42.42.133' '4242'" command returned 1 and Failure running script in VM: network read timed out (Connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9) Both seem to correspond to a network issue and both seem to almost exclusively and systematically happen with the w864 and w1064 VMs when running either a 32 or 64 bit WineTest job (i.e. running the full suite). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 47852] New: Let developers pick any of the Wine VM's missions for their job
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47852 Bug ID: 47852 Summary: Let developers pick any of the Wine VM's missions for their job Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Wine VMs can typically perform multiple missions. For instance the Debian 10 VM missions are: win32,test=module:win32,lang=fr_FR:win32,lang=ja_JP:win32,test=module,lang=zh_CN|wow32,test=module:wow64,test=module This means it can run the tests against the win32, wow32 and wow64 Wine builds, in English, French, Japanese and Chinese locales. But when submitting a job though the website the tests are only run against the win32 Wine build in the English locale and the developer cannot pick any other test configuration. This means debugging failures that only happen on the wow64 build of the TestBot require sending the patch to wine-devel which pollutes the mailing list, triggers many other tests, and is cumbersome for the developer. So the 'Submit job' page should analyze a Wine VM's missions and provide a way to pick any combination of build and language (since they are independent). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 40239] New: Submitting more than one job for a given file fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40239 Bug ID: 40239 Summary: Submitting more than one job for a given file fails Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Steps to reproduce: * Open the 'Submit job' page in two windows. * In both select the same file, for instance a patch.diff file or mytest.exe one. * Fill the Remarks field and click on the next button in both windows. * Continue the submission process on both sides. * At the end one job will work and the other will have 'unknown' written in the 'File name' column and fail with a TestBot error. During the submission process the server faces the following conditions: * The server needs the uploaded file early in the submission process so it can analyze it and adjust the questions it asks later (e.g. prefill the command line for patches, only present 64 bit VMs for 64 bit executables, etc.). * There is no job yet to store the user-provided file. So it is stored in a temporary 'staging' area and then moved into place when the job is created. * The user can abandon the submission process at any time which causes the temporary files he uploaded to be orphaned. To deal with this issue the server has a garbage collecting mechanism. * To avoid interference between users if they upload files that have the same name the temporary filename is prefixed with a per-user string. * However nothing prevents a collision in the staging area starts two job submissions at the same time for the same file. This is what happens in the steps above. That last point is somewhat intentional as it limits the accumulation of orphaned files if a user abandons a submission only to pick it up a bit later. But getting a broken job is wrong in any case. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 39417] New: Display duration instead of 'Ended' time
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39417 Bug ID: 39417 Summary: Display duration instead of 'Ended' time Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- For Jobs and Tasks the website shows the 'Ended' time but this is not very practical. Developers would likely be much more interested in the time it took to run the job/task. So all this does is force them to do that calculation themselves. The (slight) difficulty is mostly that the relevant pages use a base class that builds the HTML from all the selected fields. So the framework would need to be modified to let subclasses either provide their own 'virtual columns' with the corresponding header and content. Alternatively, in this case we could make do with letting them replace the column's header and content. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 47844] New: Add a dual-screen Wine VM
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Bug ID: 47844 Summary: Add a dual-screen Wine VM Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Wine has tests that deal with multi-head displays. These would need some matching multi-head test Wine VMs. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 47869] New: dwrite:font fails on cw-rx460-1809
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47869 Bug ID: 47869 Summary: dwrite:font fails on cw-rx460-1809 Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com dwrite:font started failing when the AMD HD6800 graphics card was replaced with the ADM RX 460 one. The failures are always the same: font.c:1731: Test failed: got 0x8007007a font.c:1744: Test failed: got 54 font.c:1749: Test failed: got 54 The exact tag is cw-rx460-1809, which is the Windows 10 1809 disk image. This means either the new graphics driver changed something (maybe it installed a new strange font?), or a Windows 10 update slipped in while the new graphics driver was being updated (which is quite likely). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 48191] New: Add a captcha to the feedback page
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48191 Bug ID: 48191 Summary: Add a captcha to the feedback page Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- We are now regularly getting spam on the captcha page. Spammers really have time to waste! So we should add a captcha. Despite its simplicity the one on the registration page still seems to work so it should be a simple matter of porting it over. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 48035] New: Speed up the new failures detection
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48035 Bug ID: 48035 Summary: Speed up the new failures detection Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- When a task completes the TestBot distinguishes new failures from preexisting ones by comparing the task's report to the latest WineTest report. Any failure present in the task's report which is not present in the WineTest report is new. This means parsing both reports to extract the errors and diffing them. This needs to be done whenever we need the list of new failures which is: * When sending a notification to the developer when a wine-patches job completes. * On the JobDetails page. But the WineTest reports are pretty big (~600KB on Windows, ~1.5MB on Wine) which translates into non negligible processing time. For instance on my development environment loading the JobDetails page for a job with 1 Windows report and 8 Wine reports takes about 0.2 s without the reference WineTest reports, but close to 2 s when they are present. So it would help to only store the WineTest failures instead of the full report (optimisation a in bug 47998). This would cut down not only on the amount of data to read, but also on the required parsing. Testing this in the same development environment indicates this could bring the JobDetails processing time down to about 0.3 s. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 47998] New: Better deal with random test failures
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47998 Bug ID: 47998 Summary: Better deal with random test failures Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Some tests fail randomly. They should be fixed of course but the in the meantime the TestBot should try not to report them as new failures when they happen. To detect new errors the TestBot compares a task's test result with that of the latest WineTest run. So if a failure did not happen during the last WineTest run and then happens when testing a patch it will be reported as a new failure. To avoid that the TestBot should take into account not just the latest WineTest report, but all the available test reports. This way, if the random failure happened in any of those runs it will be reported as pre-existing as expected. How much of a history to take into account can then be adjusted by changing $JobPurgeDays, or adding a specific setting. Note that this means if a failure is fixed and is reintroduced soon after it will not be reported as a new failure. This scenario should be rare enough to not be an issue in practice. To implement this: 1. Store the WineTest reports in the var/latest directory with the following naming format: <vmname>-job<jobid>_<stepno>_<taskno>-<report> 2. At the start of WineRunTask and WineRunWineTest delete any reference report in the task's directory (in case the task is restarted), then make new hard links to the current set of reference reports. Handle this in LogUtils::GrabReferenceReports() so this code is shared. 3. Add LogUtils::AddReferenceReport() to deal with copying the WineTest reports to var/latest. Call this function when WineRunTask and WineRunWineTest complete. 4. In GetNewLogErrors() initially mark all errors as new. Then diff the current report with each of the reference reports located in the task's directory in turn and remove any error that's not new from the set of new errors. Note that currently the reference logs are simple copies of the original WineTest report. This means these are large files which must be parsed again to extract errors. With the current $JobPurgeDays setting there will be around 20 reference logs which will require 20 times as much log parsing. So there are two optimizations one can do, both happening when adding a new reference report (i.e. in AddReferenceReport()): a. Instead of copying the full report, save only the errors. That's all the diff needs and this should reduce the size of the files by a factor of 10 (and thus speed up parsing). b. After saving a new reference file, diff it against the old reference files. Delete any old reference file that has no error not already present in the new reference file. This will not help much if the set of failures is different with every run. But otherwise this will speed up both the parsing and diffing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 42770] New: test.winehq.org: Provide a view showing only the TestBot VMs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42770 Bug ID: 42770 Summary: test.winehq.org: Provide a view showing only the TestBot VMs Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- In Huw's words: > Something else that would be very useful is the ability to > display just the test bot VMs. These are the ones we care > about the most, and the ones that are possible to fix without > having to get a third-party to manually run a test. I find it > difficult to just keep track of these VMs when their results get > swamped by all the other machines’ failures. > > I‘d imagine this should be possible to do using static > pages. The root page (equivalent to data/index.html) > could be something like data/wtb_index.html. Clicking > on a build id would take you to data/build-id/wtb_index.html, > then clicking on an OS flavour would take you to > data/build-id/wtb_index_flavour.html. You’d also need some > way to toggle in and out of the mode. This should be pretty similar to adding the 'flat index' files mentioned in bug 39379. https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39379 An interesting alternative would be to go the JavaScript way and make the index files, which are essentially big tables, sortable, filterable on the client-side. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3