November 2019 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 46916] New: Can' t restore focus to certain minimized fullscreen applications
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Feb '20

25 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46916 Bug ID: 46916 Summary: Can't restore focus to certain minimized fullscreen applications Product: Wine Version: 4.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: chrylis(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 64004 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64004 stderr logs This is a counterpart to the many (mostly resolved?) bugs regarding switching *out* of fullscreen applications. On some applications, I can switch out of the window without any problem. If the application has changed the desktop resolution, it is restored to the previous setting (e.g., 1920x1080->3840x2160). However, I cannot restore focus to the application once it loses focus. The application will unminimize (from the taskbar or the window switcher), and the mouse cursor changes to the appropriate graphics, but the application seems never to be unblurred; it's not redrawn (I believe this is its own choice when it thinks it doesn't have focus), and the "bookmarked" resolution isn't applied. The application does not respond to input, and I have to kill Wine from the CLI. The applications I have available where I'm able to reproduce the behavior are based on the Civ4 engine (Civ4 itself, Railroads!). The behavior is identical regardless of whether the application changes the screen resolution (if it hasn't, then it'll switch back to full screen and show the last render but is still frozen). Fallout 2, with or without Restoration, does *not* reproduce the behavior. It may be linked to D3D. I'm running KWin 5.14.5 on Intel graphics. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 40187] New: Dream Acquarium can't run
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Feb '20

25 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40187 Bug ID: 40187 Summary: Dream Acquarium can't run Product: Wine Version: 1.8 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: sdunnagan(a)yahoo.com Distribution: --- Something changed in the Dream Acquarium application, and now it doesn't run after it automatically installs updates. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 45216] New: Alien: Isolation crashes on startup
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Feb '20

25 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45216 Bug ID: 45216 Summary: Alien: Isolation crashes on startup Product: Wine Version: 3.8 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: moihack.inside(a)gmail.com Distribution: ArchLinux Created attachment 61439 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=61439 Alien:Isolation terminal output Alien: Isolation (Steam version) crashes on startup. There is an attempt for the game to load as a process named AI.exe is created and a window pops up on a black screen but with the mouse cursor changing to the in-game one. So the game at least attempts to boot up. Specifically for Arch Linux which I use, there is a "trick" to get this game running. If you install the package "wine-staging-nine" from the official repositories here : https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/wine-staging-nine/ the game boots correctly. It does not boot up with plain wine-staging or vanilla wine + gallium nine patches. So it probably needs a mix of patches from both projects. I'm attaching a terminal output below. GPU used: Radeon HD 6870 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 47042] New: Ignore replies to patchset parts
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '20

23 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47042 Bug ID: 47042 Summary: Ignore replies to patchset parts Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The TestBot treats every email as a potential patch. This makes sense as replies to a patch could be a new version for that patch which means it should be tested. But replies to parts of patches are different. Here is what happened due to the failure to recognize this. I'm not sure why but the TestBot must have received the following emails in this order (this is not the order of the send times but it matches the order in which I received the emails in my inbox): * [PATCH 1/5] ntoskrnl.exe: Implement PsLookupThreadByThreadId. https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-April/144085.html Part 1/5 in a patch series. The TestBot created a PendingPatchSet object to track the different parts. * Re: [PATCH 1/5] ntoskrnl.exe: Implement PsLookupThreadByThreadId. https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-April/144088.html The TestBot decided this looked like a patch because the HTML version contains lines that start with "+++ ". Thus it treated this email as a new version of the previous patch, like it usually does, and replaced patch 1 in the PendingPatchSet. * Re: [PATCH 2/5] ntoskrnl.exe: Implement KeAreApcsDisabled using critical region functions. https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-April/144086.html The TestBot created a job to test this patch but used the updated part 1 of the patch set which in fact was an HTML email. This resulted in an invalid patch and thus a failure to apply. The TestBot probably did two things wrong: 1. It took a patch from an HTML attachment. The TestBot already rejects those but somehow the $Part->effective_type ne "text/html" test in Patch::NewPatch() did not work. 2. It replaced part 1 of a patchset with a new version. One cannot send a new version of a part in a patchset: the whole patchset must be resubmitted (*). So the TestBot should never replace a part in a patchset. It looks like this check should be done in PendingPatchSets::NewSubmission() near the $Set->Parts->GetItem($PartNo) call. The issue here is that we may receive emails out of order. So we could receive a reply to part 1, and thus add it as part 1, before we receive the actual email for part 1. (*) Otherwise we'd have to keep the patchsets around and create new jobs for all parts that follow the replaced part. And if multiple parts are replaced... madness! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 1

[Bug 48031] New: Limit the size of the task logs
by WineHQ Bugzilla 23 Feb '20

23 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48031 Bug ID: 48031 Summary: Limit the size of the task logs Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The TestBot does not check the size of the reports and logs it downloads from the VMs. These could be quite big and are even more likely to get big if setting WINEDEBUG is allowed. So there should be a limit. The TestAgent GetFile() API has no provision for putting a limit on the size of the file being retrieved. But checking the size against a limit would come quite naturally if the files are retrieved one chunk at a time (see bug 48030). Note that the Wine rebuild logs are quite big (11MB). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 47899] New: Review the VM name validation
by WineHQ Bugzilla 22 Feb '20

22 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47899 Bug ID: 47899 Summary: Review the VM name validation Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The web interface allows the creation of VMs that have dashes in their name. But when untainting its parameters LibvirtTool considers such names to be invalid, so that trying to revert these VMm fails. There is a VM::Validate() method that should validate the VM name among others, but obviously it cannot be used to check and untaint script parameters. So the VM name validation criterions need to be checked and a standard function provided. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 47492] New: Typo in function name (__wine_spec_fini)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Feb '20

22 Feb '20

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47492 Bug ID: 47492 Summary: Typo in function name (__wine_spec_fini) Product: Wine Version: 4.12.1 Hardware: x86 OS: Solaris Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: tools Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: evgeny.v.litvinenko(a)gmail.com Created attachment 64875 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64875 A patch example. Hi all. It looks like there is a typo in the file tools/winegcc/winegcc.c The command ggrep "[^_]_wine_spec_fini" -r * in the source tree finds two places where __wine_spec_fini is with one underscore in the begining. I've attached a patch just to show the places with typo (I think it's a typo), feel free to use it as you want. Regards evgeny. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 17272] New: Zmodeler: Icons and overall GUI blinky
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Feb '20

22 Feb '20

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17272 Summary: Zmodeler: Icons and overall GUI blinky Product: Wine Version: 1.1.14 Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: gaming4jc2(a)yahoo.com Created an attachment (id=19272) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19272) Simple log of fixme's in the console Zmodeler is not quite in full working condition (but tons better than prior to 1.1.14). When using the buttons on the Main Toolbar the icons which occasionally disappear and overall 3D performance is rather slow. You can mouseover the icons and they will reappear, but it isn't overly practical... Attached is a log. I believe it has something to do with"LockWindowUpdate". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 16

[Bug 30827] New: Uninitialized memory reference in create_icon_pixmaps() -> GetDIBits() -> bitmapinfoheader_from_user_bitmapinfo()
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 19 Feb '20

19 Feb '20

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30827 Bug #: 30827 Summary: Uninitialized memory reference in create_icon_pixmaps() -> GetDIBits() -> bitmapinfoheader_from_user_bitmapinfo() Product: Wine Version: 1.5.5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Classification: Unclassified While looking at bug 30826, I saw Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at bitmapinfoheader_from_user_bitmapinfo (dib.c:177) by GetDIBits (dib.c:1210) by create_icon_pixmaps.isra.8 (window.c:883) create_icon_pixmaps calls GetDIBits with bits=NULL and a mostly uninitialized info, but bitmapinfoheader_from_user_bitmapinfo() assumes that biCompression has already been initialized. gdi32/dib.c: 149 static BOOL bitmapinfoheader_from_user_bitmapinfo( BITMAPINFOHEADER *dst, const BITMAPINFOHEADER *info ) 150 { ... 166 else if (info->biSize >= sizeof(BITMAPINFOHEADER)) /* assume BITMAPINFOHEADER */ 167 { 168 *dst = *info; 169 } ... 176 dst->biSize = sizeof(*dst); 177 if (dst->biCompression == BI_RGB || dst->biCompression == BI_BITFIELDS) 178 dst->biSizeImage = get_dib_image_size( (BITMAPINFO *)dst ); 1187 INT WINAPI GetDIBits( 1188 HDC hdc, /* [in] Handle to device context */ 1189 HBITMAP hbitmap, /* [in] Handle to bitmap */ 1190 UINT startscan, /* [in] First scan line to set in dest bitmap */ 1191 UINT lines, /* [in] Number of scan lines to copy */ 1192 LPVOID bits, /* [out] Address of array for bitmap bits */ 1193 BITMAPINFO * info, /* [in,out] Address of structure with bitmap data */ 1194 UINT coloruse) /* [in] RGB or palette index */ 1195 { ... 1208 /* Since info may be a BITMAPCOREINFO or any of the larger BITMAPINFO structures, we'll use our 1209 own copy and transfer the colour info back at the end */ 1210 if (!bitmapinfoheader_from_user_bitmapinfo( &dst_info->bmiHeader, &info->bmiHeader )) return 0; .... 1212 if (bits && 1213 (dst_info->bmiHeader.biCompression == BI_JPEG || dst_info->bmiHeader.biCompression == BI_PNG)) winex11.drv/window.c: 868 static BOOL create_icon_pixmaps( HDC hdc, const ICONINFO *icon, struct x11drv_win_data *data ) 869 { 870 char buffer[FIELD_OFFSET( BITMAPINFO, bmiColors[256] )]; 871 BITMAPINFO *info = (BITMAPINFO *)buffer; ... 881 info->bmiHeader.biSize = sizeof(BITMAPINFOHEADER); 882 info->bmiHeader.biBitCount = 0; 883 if (!(lines = GetDIBits( hdc, icon->hbmColor, 0, 0, NULL, info, DIB_RGB_COLORS ))) goto failed; Note that GetDIBits is careful to avoid referencing biCompression itself when bits is NULL, but the function it calls doesn't know whether bits is NULL. (bug 30266 is nearby but doesn't seem related?) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 12

[Bug 35937] New: The file crashed upon loading the program.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 19 Feb '20

19 Feb '20

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35937 Bug ID: 35937 Summary: The file crashed upon loading the program. Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: carlino.designs(a)gmail.com Created attachment 47995 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=47995 Error log file for eDCAA.exe The file crashed upon loading the program. The file can be downloaded at: http://brightemo.co.uk/download/eDCAA.exe -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 11