October 2020 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 46439] New: error when installs mBlock 5 for PC
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46439 Bug ID: 46439 Summary: error when installs mBlock 5 for PC Product: Wine-staging Version: 3.6 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: paulo_fg(a)hotmail.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- software link: http://www.mblock.cc/mblock-software/ error: 012d:err:ole:CoGetClassObject class {56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090} not registered 012d:err:ole:CoGetClassObject no class object {56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090} could be created for context 0x1 winecfg: Windows 10 Tested on Linux Mint Tessa -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 25543] New: Submitter's test results missing from 'Test Results' table
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25543 Summary: Submitter's test results missing from 'Test Results' table Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: hoehle(a)users.sourceforge.net The link in the mail that the maintainer receives, e.g. "Test Results submitted for version 1.0 of X by Y" http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=4219&iTestingI… leads to a page that shows the submitter's text with the title "Selected Test Results (selected in 'Test Results' table below)" However, the OS/version/rating 'test results' line corresponding to the submission is missing. Instead the topmost line displays an old (known) entry. This is really confusing and irritating. Furthermore, the page displayed does not show a "process" or "reply" buttons. I need to go to my queue and identify this entry among all the elements of the queue in order to process it. I believe both things worked well in the past -- 2-3 years ago? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 42630] New: Submitted application test shows no test data when previewed
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42630 Bug ID: 42630 Summary: Submitted application test shows no test data when previewed Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fjfrackiewicz(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hi, As per Roseanne's request in this bug report https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34647#c23 I am filing a new bug that I have come across in the AppDB. I have submitted this test for GOG Galaxy https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?bIsQueue=false&bIsRejected=false… and when I go to preview it, there is no test data shown whatsoever. I made the report while using Firefox 52.0 in case it helps. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 1

[Bug 42333] New: "Top garbage" list on AppDB
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42333 Bug ID: 42333 Summary: "Top garbage" list on AppDB Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: roothorick(a)gmail.com Just a simple top 10 or top 25 list of the most active apps with a garbage rating. It would be an easy at-a-glance forecast of what apps (and therefore, indirectly, what bugs) are the greatest concern for Wine users. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 44333] New: Alphabetical order for monitored Applications
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44333 Bug ID: 44333 Summary: Alphabetical order for monitored Applications Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: mywine(a)schiermeier-it.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 60207 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=60207 Actual view of AppDBs side bar at the end of this bar Two points about the side bar in AppDB: 1.) Would like to have either a possibility to choose the order or this list should be in alphabetical order 2.) The "Maintainer box" should be before the list of monitored applications. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 46461] New: Game Version is on the wrong game page
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46461 Bug ID: 46461 Summary: Game Version is on the wrong game page Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: gero45(a)mr-gero.de Distribution: --- I think that Version "3.1415926" on the Page for Civilization IV:Colonization (https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=953) doesn't belong to this Game. Instead it probably belongs to the original "Sid Meier's Colonization" (https://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/sid-meiers-colonization) instead. Reasons: -there is no such Version for Civilization IV:Colonization -the last test mentions a patch for Win95 and a Win16 installer version, this would fit with the Game from 1995. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 48607] New: Incorrect developer name for YGOPro
by WineHQ Bugzilla 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48607 Bug ID: 48607 Summary: Incorrect developer name for YGOPro Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: cumandr+wine(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=14884 YGOPro is not developed by "Kaiba Corporation". Numerous forks exist, some violating the GPL, but the original codebase is located at https://github.com/Fluorohydride/ygopro and not led by any organization. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 18790] New: Default search does not include resolved bugs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18790 Summary: Default search does not include resolved bugs Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk The default search (the search box at the top of this page) does not include closed bugs (rightly so), but it also does not include resolved bugs. This leads to duplicates that could be avoided. See Bug 18601 - a recent regression that is fixed by the next release, but anyone searching for an open bug for Google Sketchup will not see it unless they choose to run an advanced search, which some users clearly don't. I'm sure this is a simple change to the code. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 24566] New: bugzilla adds mr.bugs to cc list?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24566 Summary: bugzilla adds mr.bugs to cc list? Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Bugs start out with Mr. Bugs as the default assignee, which is evidently intended so the mailing list gets copied on all bug changes. That's fine. But under some situations, bugzilla seems to also automatically add mr. bugs to the cc list. For instance, here: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-bugs/2010-September/251648.html Whereupon Dmitry promptly removed it from the cc: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-bugs/2010-September/251690.html Austin verified that this had been done automatically by repeating his component change: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-bugs/2010-September/251728.html and then removed the extra cc manually in the next change. What's going on here? Should that cc be added automatically or not? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

[Bug 39009] New: "Importance" link on bug report form opens in wrong place on fields descriptions page
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 Jul '25

16 Jul '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39009 Bug ID: 39009 Summary: "Importance" link on bug report form opens in wrong place on fields descriptions page Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dimesio(a)earthlink.net Distribution: --- The fields description page has two sections for Importance. The first one is right below the status definitions table; right below it are the definitions for Priority and Severity (which is what users need to see). The second Importance section is toward the bottom of the page, and it just describes the field as "the combination of its Priority and Severity" without the severity definitions anywhere in sight. Clicking the Importance link on the bug report form opens the page at the second Importance section when it should open at the first one (or even better, at the Severity section, since that's what we really want users to see). The result is that users don't see the actual definitions for severity even if they do bother to click the link. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4