May 2021 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 51042] New: installing eSignal errors out with "Program Error"
by WineHQ Bugzilla 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51042 Bug ID: 51042 Summary: installing eSignal errors out with "Program Error" Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: mathieu.fregeau(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- using the installer downloaded form the website (https://www.esignal.com/support/download) I attempt to install using the wine command line: wine eSignal_x64.exe it installs a dotnet, then passes through the username account validation, but subsequently Wine creates this error: Unhandled exception: unimplemented function concrt140.dll.??0_TaskCollection(a)details@Concurrency@@QAE(a)XZ called in 32-bit code (0x7b032f82). Register dump: CS:0023 SS:002b DS:002b ES:002b FS:006b GS:0063 EIP:7b032f82 ESP:0032fd44 EBP:0032fdc8 EFLAGS:00000216( - -- I -A-P- ) EAX:0032fd5c EBX:80000100 ECX:0032fd40 EDX:0032fd70 ESI:00000000 EDI:0091afc8 Stack dump: 0x0032fd44: 0032fdf4 00000008 00000002 01540000 0x0032fd54: 0032fd78 0032fd78 80000100 00000001 0x0032fd64: 00000000 7b032f82 00000002 7d98a00e 0x0032fd74: 7d98a216 0032fdc8 7bc739c6 01530060 0x0032fd84: 00000020 00000000 00000002 01530014 0x0032fd94: 00000020 00000000 00000002 01200000 Backtrace: =>0 0x7b032f82 (0x0032fdc8) 1 0x7d98903f EntryPoint+0xffffffff() in concrt140 (0x0032fe08) 2 0x7d988270 EntryPoint+0xffffffff() in concrt140 (0x0032fe54) 3 0x004a35ff EntryPoint+0xffffffff() in optionsanalytix (0x0032fec4) 4 0x004012ea EntryPoint+0xffffffff() in optionsanalytix (0x0032fee8) 5 0x007c3027 EntryPoint+0xffffffff() in optionsanalytix (0x0032ff30) 6 0x7b454882 in kernel32 (+0x34881) (0x0032ff48) 7 0x7b454cfc in kernel32 (+0x34cfb) (0x0032ffd8) 8 0x7b45488e in kernel32 (+0x3488d) (0x0032ffec) 0x7b032f82: addl $12,%esp Modules: Module Address Debug info Name (58 modules) PE 400000- c49000 Export optionsanalytix PE c50000- 10e6000 Deferred mfc140 PE 10000000-10080000 Deferred dbcapi_vc8 PE 7a840000-7a844000 Deferred opengl32 PE 7b020000-7b023000 Deferred kernelbase PE 7b420000-7b5db000 Export kernel32 PE 7bc30000-7bc34000 Deferred ntdll PE 7caa0000-7caaf000 Deferred setupapi PE 7cd00000-7cd04000 Deferred winex11 PE 7d630000-7d633000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-locale-l1-1-0 PE 7d650000-7d694000 Deferred crypt32 PE 7d780000-7d783000 Deferred msvcp120 PE 7d8a0000-7d8a3000 Deferred msvcr120 PE 7d980000-7d9bd000 Export concrt140 PE 7d9f0000-7da61000 Deferred msvcp140 PE 7daf0000-7daf4000 Deferred gdiplus PE 7db90000-7dba2000 Deferred urlmon PE 7dc30000-7dc3b000 Deferred winspool PE 7dc80000-7dc83000 Deferred usp10 PE 7dcf0000-7dd6e000 Deferred comctl32 PE 7de70000-7df52000 Deferred comdlg32 PE 7dfa0000-7dfa3000 Deferred msimg32 PE 7dfc0000-7dfc4000 Deferred uxtheme PE 7e000000-7e004000 Deferred imm32 PE 7e050000-7e058000 Deferred oleaut32 PE 7e160000-7e163000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-filesystem-l1-1-0 PE 7e170000-7e173000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-time-l1-1-0 PE 7e190000-7e195000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-math-l1-1-0 PE 7e1a0000-7e1a4000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-convert-l1-1-0 PE 7e1c0000-7e1c3000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-heap-l1-1-0 PE 7e1d0000-7e1d3000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-utility-l1-1-0 PE 7e1e0000-7e1e4000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-stdio-l1-1-0 PE 7e200000-7e205000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-multibyte-l1-1-0 PE 7e210000-7e214000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-string-l1-1-0 PE 7e230000-7e234000 Deferred api-ms-win-crt-runtime-l1-1-0 PE 7e270000-7e274000 Deferred ucrtbase PE 7e360000-7e374000 Deferred vcruntime140 PE 7e380000-7e384000 Deferred bcrypt PE 7e3a0000-7e3a3000 Deferred glu32 PE 7e3e0000-7e3e9000 Deferred msacm32 PE 7e410000-7e48d000 Deferred winmm PE 7e4f0000-7e58b000 Deferred msvcr80 PE 7e600000-7e687000 Deferred msvcp80 PE 7e740000-7e744000 Deferred rpcrt4 PE 7e7f0000-7e818000 Deferred ole32 PE 7e930000-7e933000 Deferred shcore PE 7e980000-7f256000 Deferred shell32 PE 7f380000-7f388000 Deferred shlwapi PE 7f3f0000-7f3f7000 Deferred gdi32 PE 7f560000-7f648000 Deferred user32 PE 7f780000-7f78b000 Deferred mpr PE 7f7d0000-7f7d4000 Deferred version PE 7f7f0000-7f80f000 Deferred wininet PE 7f890000-7f894000 Deferred ws2_32 PE 7f8c0000-7f8c4000 Deferred iphlpapi PE 7f910000-7f914000 Deferred msvcrt PE 7f9e0000-7f9e4000 Deferred advapi32 PE 7fa50000-7fa53000 Deferred wtsapi32 Threads: process tid prio (all id:s are in hex) 0000000e services.exe 00000023 0 0000001a 0 00000013 0 00000010 0 0000000f 0 00000011 plugplay.exe 00000017 0 00000016 0 00000012 0 00000018 winedevice.exe 00000020 0 0000001d 0 0000001c 0 0000001b 0 00000019 0 0000001e explorer.exe 00000029 0 00000028 0 00000027 0 0000001f 0 00000021 winedevice.exe 00000026 0 00000025 0 00000024 0 00000022 0 0000002a eSignal_x64.exe 000001aa 0 0000019b 0 00000198 0 0000002b 0 00000197 msiexec.exe 0000019a 0 000001a6 msiexec.exe 000001a5 0 000001bd winemenubuilder.exe 000001c0 0 000001c7 (D) C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Interactive Data\Options Analytix\OptionsAnalytix.exe 000001cb 0 000001ca 0 <== System information: Wine build: wine-5.0 (Ubuntu 5.0-3ubuntu1) Platform: i386 (WOW64) Version: Windows XP Host system: Linux Host version: 5.4.0-72-generic -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 51091] New: Proteus Design Suite demo installer fails with ERROR_OUTOFMEMORY in WriteEnvironmentStrings
by WineHQ Bugzilla 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51091 Bug ID: 51091 Summary: Proteus Design Suite demo installer fails with ERROR_OUTOFMEMORY in WriteEnvironmentStrings Product: Wine Version: 6.7 Hardware: x86-64 URL: https://www.labcenter.com/downloads/prodemo.exe OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, Installer Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- This call: 010c:trace:msi:ITERATE_WriteEnvironmentString name L"=-*LXKSERVER" value L"[KEY_SERVER]" fails because KEY_SERVER isn't defined, which causes deformat_string() to correctly return an empty string and 0 length, which ITERATE_WriteEnvironmentString() interprets as failure. It's possible KEY_SERVER should be defined, though, but definitely WriteEnvironmentStrings is broken. leslie(a)terabithia:~/Downloads$ sha1sum prodemo.exe f2782cdfe3aac2d31e80e57815395d36b5b83d46 prodemo.exe -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 51037] New: PIA-Tool crashes at startup
by WineHQ Bugzilla 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51037 Bug ID: 51037 Summary: PIA-Tool crashes at startup Product: Wine Version: 6.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ipad.blanche+wine2104(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 69892 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69892 Backtrace after startup PIA installer works, but installed tool crashes when started via wine. Installer can be found at https://www.datenschutz-bayern.de/dsfa/ Direct link https://www.datenschutz-bayern.de/download/PIA.Setup.2.0.0.5.exe -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 51097] New: Listening on the same port on two different IPs does not work
by WineHQ Bugzilla 04 May '21

04 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51097 Bug ID: 51097 Summary: Listening on the same port on two different IPs does not work Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winsock Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: stefan(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Creating two UDP sockets and binding them to the same port on different IP addresses does not work. Only the last bound socket receives its packets while the other's are silently discarded. Description in pseudo code: sock1 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); sock2 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); addr.sin_family = AF_INET; addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.1.100"); addr.sin_port = htons(22222); res = bind(sock1, &addr, sizeof(addr)); addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.250.100"); res = bind(sock2, &addr, sizeof(addr)); Now put them into non-blocking mode and select() on them. Only sock1 will receive something. The cause is the custom BPF filter written to solve bug 7929. It binds both ports to 0.0.0.0:22222 and sets up a custom filter to filter for 192.168.250.100 + 192.168.250.255 and 192.168.1.100 + 192.168.1.255 respectively. Packets received on 192.168.250.100 are evaluated by the filter rule for sock1, found not matching and discarded without being evaluated for a possible match on sock 2. Disabling the custom filter rules and passing the actual IP addresses to Unix bind() solves the problem but brings back the non-matching broadcast rules that are at the heart of bug 7929. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 51095] New: wineconsole - Scalable fonts with fsCsb[0] == 0 are not enumerated correctly
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51095 Bug ID: 51095 Summary: wineconsole - Scalable fonts with fsCsb[0] == 0 are not enumerated correctly Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: vladimir.kokovic(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- In wineconsole->Properties->Font still lack in the list of "Less Perfect Dos Vga" as well as "More Perfect Dos Vga". This fonts are referred in the Bug 51041. Vladimir Koković, DP senior(70), Serbia, Belgrade, 4.May 2021 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 31787] New: Run the tests in Wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31787 Bug #: 31787 Summary: Run the tests in Wine Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Classification: Unclassified The Wine TestBot runs the conformance tests on Windows VMs before they are committed to Wine. This greatly helped improve the quality of our conformance tests. The next step is making sure that the conformance tests work reliably in Wine too, and that Wine patches don't break them. The hope is that this will help us improve the state of the WineTest results: http://test.winehq.org/data/ Doing so will be much more processor intensive than the current process: * Currently only the conformance test patches are tested whereas we would need to test almost every single patch (we could ignore some documentation patches for instance). * Currently we only have to generate a binary for the one conformance test that's impacted. That's quick. Testing all Wine patches will require recompiling Wine every time which takes more time, even with ccache. * A Wine patch can have wide-ranging effects. For instance a patch to ntdll could impact pretty much any conformance test. That means rerunning all of them for every patch... unless we find reliable ways of pruning them (patches to conformance tests would be an obvious optimization). * Like for Windows we will need to test various configurations: different locales; 32, 64 and 32+64 bit Wine builds; different sound backends; possibly different Linux distributions; if possible FreeBSD and Solaris too (I'm leaving Mac OS X for another bug). In some cases the same binaries can be used for multiple tests (e.g. if only the locale changes) but in other cases not. * Also for the current Wine TestBot an unreliable test only impacts people modifying that test. But the above point means an unreliable test would impact most Wine patches, leading to lots of patches being rejected. So this means unreliable tests become a big issue and need to be handled in some way: fixed or blacklisted or still run but not considered cause for rejection (so one can notice when they get fixed). Then there is the question of whether this should be done by modifying the Wine TestBot or by using the BuildBot framework: http://trac.buildbot.net/wiki/AboutBuildbot Dan Kegel produced a proof of concept system based on BuildBot: http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot An issue is that without significant integration work, having both a WineTestBot and BuildBot system would be annoying: * The Wine TestBot currently has its own user database and BuildBot would add another one. So it would be one more login to manage for developers unless we manage to integrate either with another user database (e.g. through LDAP). * Developers would have to submit patches to both sites and check the results on both. * Integration with the Wine Patches site (http://source.winehq.org/patches/) would need to work with both systems. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 14

[Bug 33234] New: Improve user management
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33234 Bug #: 33234 Summary: Improve user management Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Classification: Unclassified When an account request is sent to a WineTestBot administrator the URL he gfets sent to is the UserDetails.pl one but it only has an 'Approve' button, not a 'Reject' one. This makes it unclear how to reject spam requests for instance (bug 31798), but this has now been documented. Still, rejecting an application actually requires going to another page and deleting the provisional account. This should be simpler: there should be a 'Reject' button right on the UserDetails page that does that. Furthermore, the status of the account, 'Pending approval' and 'Pending activation', should be clearly indicated both on the UserDetails page and on the UsersList page. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 48093] New: On cw-rx460 the WoW WinePrefixes are (likely) broken
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48093 Bug ID: 48093 Summary: On cw-rx460 the WoW WinePrefixes are (likely) broken Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- On cw-rx460 the wineprefixes created for the wow32 and wow64 test runs are flawed: * It looks like they do not define the %windir% and %SystemRoot% environment variables: https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-October/152271.html * They may be responsible for a failure in crypt32:sip https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2019-November/154240.html What's puzzling is that cw-rx460 runs the same wt-daily script (*) as cw-gtx560 and other machines which don't have the same set of failures (see also bug 48092). cw-rx460 is not a TestBot VM so this does not impact the TestBot results. But if the wineprefixes are indeed causing extra test failures this could lead developers on a wild goose chase. So to avoid confusion I disabled the wow32 and wow64 WineTest runs on that machine until I have had time to investigate. (*) https://github.com/fgouget/wt-daily -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 39442] New: Using Spice required to avoid failure in mmdevapi:capture
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39442 Bug ID: 39442 Summary: Using Spice required to avoid failure in mmdevapi:capture Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The Windows 7+ VMs all use an ich6 virtual soundcard (they don't support any of ac97, es1370 or sb16 ones). But they have failures in mmdevapi:capture such as: capture.c:586: Returned latency: 5.8050 ms capture.c:178: Test failed: Position 375 expected 0 capture.c:186: Wait'ed position 375 pad 0 flags 1, amount of frames locked: 448 capture.c:228: Test failed: Position 1719 expected 823 [...] It turns out that the way the VM is configured for remote access impacts the result of the tests: * If configured for VNC then the tests fail as described, even if no client is connected. * If configured for Spice access then the tests succeed, even if no client is connected. And if a client is connected the sound is carried over with pretty good reliability. So the way one accesses the VM changes the behavior in the guest. That seems wrong and I reported it to QEmu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1499908 I have updated the w7pro64 configuration on 2015/09/25 and it now only has one intermittent Master volume failure left in mmdevapi:capture. The change does not seem to have negatively impacted the other tests. So it seems the change can safely be propagated to the other Windows 7+ VMs. There may be one issue though, which is that combining QXL with Spice causes the Windows 10 VM to freeze very quickly. Hopefully that's specific to Windows 10. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 39419] New: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39419 Bug ID: 39419 Summary: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- There are two very common 'boterror' types: Failure running script in VM: the "nc -q0 '10.42.42.133' '4242'" command returned 1 and Failure running script in VM: network read timed out (Connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9) Both seem to correspond to a network issue and both seem to almost exclusively and systematically happen with the w864 and w1064 VMs when running either a 32 or 64 bit WineTest job (i.e. running the full suite). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2