August 2023 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 54834] New: Some applications hang at startup with seemingly frozen window since Wine 8.2
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54834 Bug ID: 54834 Summary: Some applications hang at startup with seemingly frozen window since Wine 8.2 Product: Wine Version: 8.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: o.dierick(a)piezo-forte.be Distribution: --- Created attachment 74336 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74336 ImgBurn on Wine 8.1 (on commit 0692d07f) terminal output Hello, After an update from 8.0-rc5 to 8.5 some applications fails to start. I did a regression test and the last working release is 8.1 (exact commit in regression field). The affected applications are: Ubisoft connect (prevents ability to play many games) (on 32-bit and 64-bit). ImgBurn. Regards. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 55321] New: Gdiplus curve flattening broken
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55321 Bug ID: 55321 Summary: Gdiplus curve flattening broken Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdiplus Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: k.kahurani(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 74915 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74915 Behaviour on Windows vs behaviour on Wine It looks to me like GdipFlattenPath is broken because it essentially produces straight lines with sharp corners. This behaviour is also seen on Windows but only when the 'flatness' passed to the function is a huge value. The same code on Windows produces the image on the left while on Wine it produces the image on the right. The two seem to differ a lot because one is essentially a curve while on the right is essentially a polygon. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 52767] New: wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0000000000000000 at address 00000003AF6DAE20 (thread 002c), starting debugger...
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52767 Bug ID: 52767 Summary: wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0000000000000000 at address 00000003AF6DAE20 (thread 002c), starting debugger... Product: Wine-staging Version: 7.5 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: avenjames(a)live.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Suddenly returned fault while to start Wine, terminal export the log: winecfg wine: created the configuration directory '/Users/avenjames/.wine' 0024:fixme:esync:do_esync eventfd not supported on this platform. 002c:fixme:esync:do_esync eventfd not supported on this platform. 002c:fixme:actctx:parse_depend_manifests Could not find dependent assembly L"Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls" (6.0.0.0) 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk wine-staging 7.5 is a testing version containing experimental patches. 002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org. wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0000000000000000 at address 00000003AF6DAE20 (thread 002c), starting debugger... 002c:err:seh:start_debugger Couldn't start debugger L"winedbg --auto 40 48" (2) Read the Wine Developers Guide on how to set up winedbg or another debugger wine: could not load kernel32.dll, status c0000135 192:~ avenjames$ tried to reinstall the Wine via Brew, clean prefix and .wine folder, fixed permission of the disk, and remove all history of the terminal session, but still the same. I remember that before clean the prefix and the wine folder, it could run app with a debug window but can't do anything, after clean the prefix and .wine, it couldn't be started with wineboot or winecfg. any idea bros? OS: OSX 10.14 Mojave Platform: RMBP mid-2015 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 52696] New: idk why this is happending
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52696 Bug ID: 52696 Summary: idk why this is happending Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ariannaperezlove(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72043 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72043 idk what happening i was trying to play roblox than that happend ! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 46405] New: steam: crashes when opening game
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46405 Bug ID: 46405 Summary: steam: crashes when opening game Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: yuettingng(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 63166 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=63166 program error details Game crashes when I started to play on steam -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 54730] New: EverQuest: game compositor freezes during account switching
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 Bug ID: 54730 Summary: EverQuest: game compositor freezes during account switching Product: Wine-staging Version: 8.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: johnherschelfreeman2013(a)gmail.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 74235 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74235 log after switching to another account and returning to account with game running During a switch to another account compositor window freezes and when switching back to account executing the wine process video does not update in the compositor window -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 54795] New: configure fails to find pcap development libraries with libpcap <1.9.0 present
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 Bug ID: 54795 Summary: configure fails to find pcap development libraries with libpcap <1.9.0 present Product: Wine Version: 8.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wpcap Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: o.dierick(a)piezo-forte.be Distribution: --- Hello, In my case, Debian 8 "Jessie" ships libpcap 1.6.2. According to the man page, pcap_init was introduced in libpcap 1.9.0. https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/pcap_init.3pcap.html The ~regression~ commit modifies configure to check for pcap_init() in lieu of pcap_create(), which fails on such old OS. Regards. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 54981] New: Visio 2003 When using ux theme icons are not rendered on object property panels
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54981 Bug ID: 54981 Summary: Visio 2003 When using ux theme icons are not rendered on object property panels Product: Wine Version: 8.8 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: winebugs(a)copysoft.org Distribution: --- Created attachment 74520 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74520 Icons in Visio2003 property panels are rendered blank when using light theme. When using Visio 2003 in Wine 8.7 and 8.8 when the "Light Theme" is enabled in the Desktop Integration panel of the Wine configuration if I select properties in an object the icons are drawn blank, if I select "no theme" the icons are drawn normally. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 54959] New: winhttp:notification - test_websocket() times out on Windows and Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54959 Bug ID: 54959 Summary: winhttp:notification - test_websocket() times out on Windows and Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winhttp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com winhttp:notification - test_websocket() times out on Windows and Wine: notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x1 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x1 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x2 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x2 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x8 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x8 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x4000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x4000 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x10 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x10 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x20 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x20 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x40 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x40 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x80 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x80 to be called from the same thread notification.c:118: Test failed: 994: expected status 0x20000 got 0x200000 notification.c:123: Test failed: 994: expected callback 0x200000 to be called from the same thread winhttp:notification:1448 done (258) in 120s 9182B This is not a regression but rather an issue with the server. lsof shows the test stuck with a connection to 104.21.29.32 (but that's a CloudFlare IP). So the server's behavior must have changed recently and if that's not temporary the test will need to be adjusted. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 45983] New: Not working gamepad in windows steam games
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45983 Bug ID: 45983 Summary: Not working gamepad in windows steam games Product: Wine-staging Version: 3.18 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: nickfaces(a)gmail.com CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- With 3.18-staging not working gamepad in windows steam games. No errors in terminal. The problems in Arch and Ubuntu 18 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5