July 2024 - Wine-bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 49243] New: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ is very slow in China
by WineHQ Bugzilla 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49243 Bug ID: 49243 Summary: https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ is very slow in China Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: widon1104(a)qq.com Distribution: --- I use deepin15.11, I find out "deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ stretch main " this link is very slow in China. It's very hard to download all the packages in this link, often it will take more than 2 hours to download all the packages and sometimes the download will fail I have to download again and again. I hope winehq.org make Chinese user download new version of wine faster. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 47589] New: WineHQ requires email to sign up, sign in and to recover access
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47589 Bug ID: 47589 Summary: WineHQ requires email to sign up, sign in and to recover access Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: kolan_n(a)mail.ru It may be inacceptible for users living in jurisdictions with oppressive regimes requiring all the email providers either collect the personal data tying an account to a government-issued ID or being blocked. For example cellphone numbers. Now most of email providers require cellphone number validation. But not all. Ironically the only email providers not enforcing this I know are Russian ones. But the State Duma is preparing a law requiring all the email providers to do that, so I expect there will be no free email providers not doing that (probably except Riseup, but I won't use Riseup services). So it is important to allow users contribute without having a email addreess. For access recovery crypto protocols or a sheet of one-time passwords can be used. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 45612] New: Enable IPv6 for dl.winehq.org
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45612 Bug ID: 45612 Summary: Enable IPv6 for dl.winehq.org Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: raul.tambre(a)gmail.com dl.winehq.org uses Fastly. Per Fastly's IPv6 documentation (https://docs.fastly.com/guides/basic-setup/ipv6-support.html) it's as easy as changing the CNAME on dl.winehq.org from k.global-ssl.fastly.net to dualstack.k.shared.global.fastly.net. I tested manually with curl and it works. Making the switch would also enable HTTP/2. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 46585] New: Some unicode characters cut off the rest of description
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 Bug ID: 46585 Summary: Some unicode characters cut off the rest of description Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: spleefer90(a)gmail.com CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 63469 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=63469 test.txt with the issue Looks like posting certain unicode characters makes rest of the description be cut off. Here's pasting of contents of the attached test.txt: Tobias -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 56635] New: Wine 9.8 is not listed on Bugzilla
by WineHQ Bugzilla 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Bug ID: 56635 Summary: Wine 9.8 is not listed on Bugzilla Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Wine 9.8 is not listed on Bugzilla. My understanding was that it was added as part of the release process. Has something failed to update? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 53652] New: invalid URL in wine-bugs digest email footer
by WineHQ Bugzilla 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53652 Bug ID: 53652 Summary: invalid URL in wine-bugs digest email footer Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: 3.2.3 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: regression Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com, jnewman(a)codeweavers.com, julliard(a)winehq.org Distribution: --- I'm guessing this happened around the mailman upgrade: Sep 10: _______________________________________________ wine-bugs mailing list -- wine-bugs(a)winehq.org - To unsubscribe send an email to wine-bugs-leave(a)winehq.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo/%(_internal_name)s versus: July 26: _______________________________________________ wine-bugs mailing list - wine-bugs(a)winehq.org https://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-bugs 'bisecting' the regression, it occurred between: bad: Aug 12 wine-bugs Digest, Vol 205, Issue 46 good: Aug 12 wine-bugs Digest, Vol 205, Issue 45 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 56630] New: Broken links in email for "Test Results added to version ..."
by WineHQ Bugzilla 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56630 Bug ID: 56630 Summary: Broken links in email for "Test Results added to version ..." Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: 56ms2hl02(a)sneakemail.com Distribution: --- In an E-Mail I got: Test Results added to version GoG of Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri by axm ------------------------------------------------------- https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=3Dversion&iId=3D24358&amp= ;iTestingId=3D114903 This Test data has been submitted by axm. ... where the link is malformed due to the line break but I also could not fix it manually. It should probably be: https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=24358 Note this is the current version and it got autoapproved (probably because I am the maintainer, too). Using this search https://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=link&no_redi… I found a simimar, but very old and outdated bug report that maybe can be closed instead: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25699 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 56612] New: AppDB now lists everyone who is e-mailed
by WineHQ Bugzilla 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56612 Bug ID: 56612 Summary: AppDB now lists everyone who is e-mailed Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 76367 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=76367 Screenshot (censored) I've received a few e-mails from the AppDB, which is the norm. It used to only list me in the To:, now it lists everyone who receives the e-mail. Leaking the user's e-mail addresses could be considered a data breach. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 28467] New: Chromium Browser restore button doesn't work
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28467 Summary: Chromium Browser restore button doesn't work Product: Wine Version: 1.3.28 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fracting(a)gmail.com 1. Download chromium from http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/snapshots/Win/95816/chrome-win32.zip unpack chrome-win32.zip, cd to the directory. 2. start chrome.exe with --no-sandbox, works around Bug 21232 $ wine chrome.exe --no-sandbox Notice that the chrome window is decorated by the Linux native window manager. Is it a bug? On windows, chrome have no traditional "window bar". Now there is two "Maximal" button: one is drawn by Linux native window manager, the other is drawed by wine chrome browser it self. 3. Click on the "Maximal" button which is drawn by Linux native window manager, then chrome browser switch to maximal mode as expect. This time, the Linux native window bar is disappear. 4. Click on the "Restore" button of wine chrome browser. However it doesn't work. Wine chrome switch to normal mode for a second, then switch back to maximal mode automatically. I use ubuntu 11.04 , with traditional gnome desktop, gnome 2.32.1 . There is some ways to work around: I. Instead of clicking on the native "Maximal" button in step 3, try to click the wine chrome "Maximal" button, then everything works as expect. II. Do not set "Allow the window manager to decorate the windows" in winecfg, then everything works as expect. III. Do not set "Allow the window manager to control the windows" in winecfg, then everything works as expect. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 14

[Bug 36692] New: Bad performance when combineng SetEvent / WaitForSingleObject for synchronizing worker threads
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 24 Jan '25

24 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36692 Bug ID: 36692 Summary: Bad performance when combineng SetEvent / WaitForSingleObject for synchronizing worker threads Product: Wine Version: 1.6.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: milasudril(a)gmail.com In a 2d simulation program, each worker thread has its own pair of events. One event is used to signal master thread that the worker thread is ready. The other is used by the master thread to signal that the worker thread may continue. In Master thread: while(!m_stop) { auto proc_ptr=processors.begin(); while(proc_ptr!=processors.end()) { // Call SetEvent on "start" event object owned by the object pointed // to by proc_ptr proc_ptr->frameNext(); ++proc_ptr; } proc_ptr=processors.begin(); while(proc_ptr!=processors.end()) { // Call WaitForSingleObject on "ready" event object owned by // the object pointed to by proc_ptr proc_ptr->wait(); ++proc_ptr; } ++framecounter; } In worker thread: while(!m_stop) { // Wait for master thread signaling start event (Calls WaitForSingleObject) start.wait(); m_model->process(m_framecounter,m_buffers[0].first ,m_buffers[0].second,m_offset); swap(m_buffers[0],m_buffers[1]); // Signal master thread that we are ready for next frame (Calls SetEvent) ready.set(); } On Wine, the framerate is half of that on Windows 7 on the same machine Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz. Also there seems to be a huge different workload on differnt cores when running under Wine. I realize that SetEvent/WaitForSingleObject are heavy functions on Windows too as they need kernel assistance, so it might be hard to make it perform better. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 30