http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12783 --- Comment #4 from Albert Lee <trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu> 2008-04-25 11:28:57 --- (In reply to comment #3)
Probably the address range we computed for ntdll is incorrect, it wouldn't make sense to have an allocation in the middle of it. Can you check where ntdll.dll.so is actually mapped?
If I work around the allocations, I see: 0009: load_dll( handle=0, base=7ff90000, size=307200, dbg_offset=0, dbg_size=0, name=7fcc0160, filename=L"ntdll.dll" ) Adding a trace to load_builtin_callback also confirms this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.