https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staged patchset| |https://github.com/wine-com | |pholio/wine-staging/blob/ma | |ster/patches/msi-Dummy_Thre | |ad/0001-msi-Create-dummy-th | |read-to-initialize-COM-for- | |custom.patch Status|NEW |STAGED --- Comment #127 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Giacomo Orlandi from comment #126)
(In reply to fjfrackiewicz from comment #125) [...]
I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted.
It has been accepted into Staging. Yay!
Shouldn't the status be set to "staging" along with the accepted patchset?
The description of the patch above says it's only a workaround to make the apps work until there is a proper fix.
I can't see a policy for this in https://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs but I assume that a bug can be marked as "fixed on staging" only if it's a proper fix, even if it hasn't been merged into the main codebase yet because it needs reviewing and some improvements.
That's not such an easy distinction to make. If the fix is proper, it wouldn't be in staging anyway, but in vanilla Wine. If the bug exists in vanilla wine, but not wine-staging, it is reasonable to make the status 'STAGED'. Side note: the staging version is less hacky than the original submission.. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.