http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29845 --- Comment #16 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> 2012-02-13 04:52:19 CST --- (In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
The C compiler is the final judge, I'd guess.
No. - The tool implementation can also apply wrong or unexpected identifiers.
In which way?
How much can you trust the compilation result which was generated by undefined behaviour?
For what purpose?
Preprocessor macros for update candidates: 1. Include guards 2. Definition of data structures
Would any more software developers prefer to reuse standard-compliant identifiers?
You can always send a (small) patch to wine-patches in order to receive an authorized opinion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.