https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53682 Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 73209 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73209 hack... This fixes it, right? It feels very ugly, because the noinline is necessary, but the alternatives I see are (b) build the whole syscall_frame in assembly (not terrible, but why make more assembly?) or (c) don't put the unix frame right under the syscall_frame, which means more indirection in the syscall handler (which means the syscall handler is potentially slower). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.