http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30307 --- Comment #7 from jbherman(a)gmail.com 2012-03-30 11:57:22 CDT --- thanks alexandre for the reply. that is what i was suspecting. however the key here is: how could the manner in which the executable is invoked (in this case by a scheduler) affect what libraries are loaded? regarding large blocks of memory. surprised to hear that in this 'big data' day and age. I analyze multi-GB datasets all the time, requiring they be in-memory. i looked at the /proc/pid/maps but will try again and post. next challenge is to provide my 32-bit program the full 2GB memory allocation it could receive in a 64-bit windows. possible? thanks, jason -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.