http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17624 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-03-05 17:00:00 --- (In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
I know I could install gecko in /usr/local/share/wine,
That's what you should do.
but I've got my reasons for not doing so, and I'm sure others may have similar reasons against it.
It's the only supported way to install Wine Gecko. I don't see any reason to not use it.
There's not a simple way then to test an application _without_ using gecko if it's installed that way. Or am I wrong on that?
You're right (unless you're using native mshtml.dll), but I don't see any reason to test that.
Sometimes it's helpful to test for some applications that only use gecko for minor features. Guess I'll just bite the bullet and install it globally... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.