http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59275 --- Comment #3 from Hans Leidekker <hans@meelstraat.net> --- (In reply to mkrsym1 from comment #2)
but it can be done separately as well
I assume the idea here is making a separate script (similar idea to winetricks) that could be used to sign the Wine DLLs in a build/prefix with a supplied certificate. That does sound reasonable.
I imagine packagers would do it after 'make install'.
Apps could go one step further and check that the publisher is MS
Many (most?) applications do not go "one step further" and just want the DLLs to be signed by anything, as long as the system trusts it. A specific check for signature being MS is a completely different question out of the scope of this one.
Sure, what I'm saying is that you don't need to spoof anything if the app is only interested in a valid signature. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.