http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33384 --- Comment #7 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2013-04-14 17:11:06 CDT --- Hello Vincent, the method signatures and order are exactly the same so I'm wondering why this second interface exist (solely for performance reasons?). The definition for Wine's "wincodec.idl" would be as follows (I replaced the GUID and CopyPalette method name): --- snip --- [ object, uuid(7543696a-bc8d-46b0-5f81-8d95728972be) ] interface IMILBitmapSource : IUnknown { HRESULT GetSize( [out] UINT *puiWidth, [out] UINT *puiHeight); HRESULT GetPixelFormat( [out] WICPixelFormatGUID *pPixelFormat); HRESULT GetResolution( [out] double *pDpiX, [out] double *pDpiY); HRESULT GetPalette( [in] IWICPalette *pIPalette); HRESULT CopyPixels( [in] const WICRect *prc, [in] UINT cbStride, [in] UINT cbBufferSize, [out, size_is(cbBufferSize)] BYTE *pbBuffer); } --- snip --- So technically if the vtable layout and method signatures are exactly the same, we could get away by just using our BitmapImpl? Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.