http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32327 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Visio 2010 Std installer |Office 2010, Visio 2010 Std |fails |installers fail --- Comment #9 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> 2012-12-02 12:58:40 CST --- (In reply to comment #8)
Created attachment 42677 [details] Support service objects in GetNamedSecurityInfo [v3]
Please take a look at the revised patch (attached).
(In reply to comment #7)
... Probably it needs splitting too, to separate *Named* part from handle part.
I planned on submitting the FIXME w/ immediate return as a separate patch. Do you really think GetSecurityInfo part needs to be separate from the GetNamedSecurityInfo portion? That portion seems pretty minor.
Yes, I think it's better to have it separately, for example regression testing will be easier if it breaks something. Applications could use GetSecurityInfo directly with service handles so if it breaks something will see it. Please send your current version to get some feedback in usual way with wine-devel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.