http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 --- Comment #14 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> 2011-08-03 12:38:38 CDT --- The first link conclusion is that we should check for both POLLIN and POLLHUP on reading, this my patch does =) After reading both links my conclusion is that I should remove the !POLLERR from both read/write making something like this: for (i = k = 0; i < readfds->fd_count; i++, j++) - if (fds[j].revents) + if ((fds[j].revents&(POLLIN|POLLHUP))) for (i = k = 0; i < writefds->fd_count; i++, j++) - if (fds[j].revents) + if ((fds[j].revents&POLLOUT) && !(fds[j].revents&POLLHUP)) It's still necessary to test !POLLHUP on write because otherwise it would return an FD in error state (false-positive connection). I'm reading more about conformance tests but AFAIK I read something about that MSG_PEEK test already implemented (or in process of being commited) in current git. Sorry about the patch format, I'm still starting on all this git stuff. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.