http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17084 --- Comment #5 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-11 20:55:53 --- (In reply to comment #4)
Don't you mind to resend these or patches were rejected for some still valid reason?
I don't recall whether I got official commentary, but I can think of a good reason the first patch was rejected: the tested executable was the output of GCC. That was laziness on my part, as I ought to have generated my own tiny executable, perhaps by hand, like dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c does. I just never got one working, and I haven't had time to work on it lately. Help with good tests would be appreciated ;-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.