http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28146 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|regression | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Regression SHA1|7b285a4ebd63eab428e968968ca | |398cc1076324a | --- Comment #1 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2011-08-23 14:52:14 CDT --- there is a patch to trace that a bit better and the log in bug 24598 as: http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36062 and http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36065 This is also not a real regression as my patch just enabled you to see the existing bug with newer headers. The Problem is that the gamma curve/ramp as per log is seemingly correct but is already at the maximum in field 3 of 256 so that's quite bright. I'll test what Win does here and even if it accepts it, we should consider to hack out too dark and too bright gamma ramps. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.