http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18517 --- Comment #35 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to phaethon from comment #34)
Created attachment 47818 [details] Final patch candidate
I think you should really send the last part as a separate patch. Since it's a copy & paste issue the chances of getting it commited are much higher. The first change of the patch also seems unrelated to the rest, so it could be a different patch. I can't comment the rest of the patch because I have no knowledge in that area, I can just tell that some lines are too long in setChanged, maybe you could use memcmp instead of comparing each individual part of the struct. And have a last struct variable with all values inside instead of separate lastXXX variables. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.