http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14983 --- Comment #11 from OlekA <brodo(a)o2.pl> 2008-09-01 05:02:25 --- (In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
Here is the bisect result : $ git bisect good 21cdaeea4bfa05859bb89dd27e3477e0cb07bb92 is first bad commit commit 21cdaeea4bfa05859bb89dd27e3477e0cb07bb92 Author: Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Thu Aug 21 15:02:15 2008 +0900 gdi32: Replace DC transform by font scaling for bitmap fonts. :040000 040000 be66e6aed5e6e12d23a186f6451fd630462a8561 fb912db74c97c49b16aa9dd7b247ffd629b2710e Mdlls
That patch has been committed before 1.1.2, so I don't see how 1.1.3 can be worse than 1.1.2.
I bisect-ed 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 several times while testing my application each time as decribed in "regression testing" procedure. Maybe git isn't perfect ? What could be wrong ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.