http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11537 --- Comment #3 from Stephen E. Baker <cycoone(a)hotmail.com> 2008-02-12 10:44:00 --- (In reply to comment #2)
Performing a regression test between 0.9.45 (known good) and 0.9.50 (known bad) I ran into another regression at wine-0.9.49-196-ga6dd479 which prevents testing this issue. Is there some way to get around this regression without messing up the binary search?
It appears that the installer is largely unstable between 0.9.49 where it worked, and 0.9.50 where this bug first occurred. Here are my results: wine-0.9.49 good wine-0.9.49-196-ga6dd479 untestable (cannot run install shield) wine-0.9.49-235-ga0c3816 untestable (fails to copy first file with 1603) wine-0.9.50 bad What should I do next to help out? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.