https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56363 --- Comment #9 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo(a)o2.pl> --- (In reply to Etaash Mathamsetty from comment #8)
...it would be much faster to use WINEDEBUG=+module or smth like that
That's just the thing: in this context (seemingly ntdll/loader.c) 'module' and 'loaddll' are the same, so I'm curious why there's nothing in those logs - in case of failure there should be, right ? So, am I failing to see something in the sources or is that patch doing something 'cute' ? (yes, to the problem at hand it's (most likely) irrelevant, still, I'm curious what's happening there) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.