http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14570 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net --- Comment #6 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2008-07-19 08:36:48 --- Hello, actually wine's gdiplus is a big work in progress so changed behaviour for apps that require gdiplus is expected. When stubs get partially or completely implemented, the program execution flow changes. Previously uncovered/skipped application code might be executed, resulting in unimplemented gdiplus APIs being called. The bug is actually a dupe of http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10982 and technically not a regression for reasons I explained. Appdb also gives a hint: --- quote acad 2005 appdb entry --- with 1.1.0 + versions of wine you need also gdiplus as native, and it's not guaranteed that it works. So, better stay to 1.0 --- quote acad 2005 appdb entry --- So 'sh winetricks gdiplus' should do it for the time being. If you encounter unimplemented APIs, google the API name on winehq/buzgilla. If you find a bug which mentions the API, add a comment "app <name> also depends on this API", preventing duplicate reports. If the API is not mentioned, it's of course completely valid to open a new bug. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.