http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717 --- Comment #24 from Krzysztof Nikiel <zzdz2(a)yahoo.pl> 2010-11-27 05:58:26 CST --- (In reply to comment #22) Do we really need more than 80dB ultrasound filtering, it will be masked by the souncard noise anyway, and masked even more by the amplifier noise. On the other side, i think it's possible a long impulse response may introduce some audible artifacts and it requires more CPU. Mixing speed may be important when mixing many buffers e.g. 3D buffers. It would be possible to add some quality control. We could store the quality index in some reg key e.g. Software\\Wine\\DirectSound\ResampleQuality -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.