7 Aug
2014
7 Aug
'14
2:49 a.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37052 --- Comment #4 from Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre(a)mecheye.net> --- Yes, the ICCCM never explicitly says that WM_TRANSIENT_FOR needs to be mapped. What it *does* say, however, is that the WM should treat unmapped windows as windows that don't exist from its point of view. So from the point of view of the WM, an unmapped window in WM_TRANSIENT_FOR is an invalid value, since it's effectively the same as a window that doesn't exist. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.