http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59142 --- Comment #21 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo@o2.pl> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #20)
(In reply to Rafał Mużyło from comment #19)
I disabled the terminal's scroll back limit
...and what that does have anything to do with getting a full log ?
Rafał, can you please stop finding the most rude and aggressive way to respond to people? Not everyone is used to redirecting output in the terminal. Your practice of discouraging people from continuing to engage with or file bug reports is doing an awful lot of harm to the project.
On one hand, you might be right that they might not know, but how would *you* get them to learn those basics ? Cause: a) sometimes the basics suffice to carry you for quite a bit; in this context, I personally actively know very little past the basics of shell redirection/autoconf syntax, yet on many occasions it had been still enough for my private use when I've tinkered in the past with some semi-abandoned projects, that needed minor fixes/updates there, yet some of the constructs in the resulting configure script tend to baffle me... b) given than one of those bits comes from wine's bug filing guide (well, maybe one reference away), do you actually discourage reading those ? yeah, bit of a strawman here, yet... On the other hand, Zeb, why are you so hype about it ? "the most rude and aggressive" ...not even close on the first (and that's only if you feel the need to read that as rude) and not at all on the second "Your practice of discouraging people..." Not my intent, quite the opposite actually...but, well, snowflakes... Yeah, yeah, I know, on occasions I'm bit of a one too, still... Everyone has their snowflake/idiot moments every now and then, it's how you get back on the track that matters. (I wonder, am I having a snowflake moment right now ? I don't think so, but, you know, difficult to tell while you're having one...) (personally, I'm starting to think you might be holding a bit of a grudge about the last cycle...) (...OK, the line above might count as passive aggressive (if you squint a bit), but you do see the difference, don't you ?) (this is getting at least a bit counterproductive (we're pretty much having a spat), but I still have have to say one thing: my first question was at very least semi-genuine) (I'm actually somewhat interested in this bug progressing, cause while I don't particularly care about the game, the described problem looks interesting, looking like a combination of codec priority problems (as long as that codec is actually getting effectively registered while the executable is running (obviously, a game won't be *globally* registering its private codec...at least one developed by an experienced studio shouldn't)) and creating/picking the right window to output the video to (will that be pixel format or something wayland specific ?)) (damn, I get so ranty on occasions, also so little actually relevant to the bug, now I feel the need to put some effort into something actually productive to balance this...:sigh:) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.