https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55290 François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS|Linux |Windows --- Comment #3 from François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> --- And this also happened 4 times on my desktop but with a smaller than expected height this time. As a result more tests failed: videorenderer.c:1957: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1963: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1968: Test failed: Got window bottom 412. videorenderer.c:1984: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1990: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1995: Test failed: Got window bottom 412. [...] videorenderer.c:2614: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2620: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2626: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2632: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2638: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2648: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2654: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2690: Test failed: Got height 378. This may be explained by a previous test that changes the screen resolution and fails to restore it. But could that also explain the cases where we get a bigger width / height than the expected 640x480? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.