https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47731 --- Comment #11 from Sveinar Søpler <cybermax(a)dexter.no> --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #10)
The magic of bisections is that "many hundreds" still only means about ten steps ;-)
Anyway, yes, it's a lot of work, but someone has to do it, or you have to ask developers to solve this bug as if they knew nothing about it. Believe me when I say that's far more difficult.
Yep. But you would only end up with a staging patch commit anyway, cos it is not that easy to bisect wine when needing staging. (Atleast not for me). Ie. Lets say i take a random git pull of wine, and try to apply staging to that it will fail. So you would end up with a certain commit of staging causing a regression, but the commit COULD still be in wine, and somewhat harder to find out as its not "just" reverting patches of wine without breaking staging. Then again, i am not that pro, so it could be easy for those in the know :) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.