19 Oct
2010
19 Oct
'10
12:32 p.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24549 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-10-19 07:32:55 CDT --- (In reply to comment #8)
I looked at the fn and it doesn't look difficult to ensure there is no below-%esp accesses. Is there some reason why the function has this particular below-%esp accesses, or is it just an accident of history?
Mostly for efficiency reasons, though at this point the function can probably be simplified a bit by not restoring all the segment regs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.