http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9356 --- Comment #16 from Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> 2007-11-25 23:32:12 --- Created an attachment (id=9347) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9347) set the fd back to blocking if necessary This part of the patch that causes the regression looks suspicious: - /* set the fd back to blocking if necessary */ - if (options & (FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT | FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT)) - fcntl( unix_fd, F_SETFL, 0 ); I'm guessing in the new code it isn't set to blocking, leading to EAGAIN on reads. If that's the case, the attached patch should fix it. Please try it and report back. (Bloody serial ports. We really need regression tests for the them.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.