22 Feb
2011
22 Feb
'11
1:36 a.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717 --- Comment #148 from Raymond <superquad.vortex2(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-21 19:36:36 CST --- (In reply to comment #143)
IMHO, the default "resample not in mixer" approach worked before exactly because of the zero-order-hold resampler that has well-defined non-overlapping regions of the primary buffer affected by each secondary buffer sample.
I still don't understand two patches 0011 and 0012 , it look like you removed the mixer of those software secondary buffers -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.