https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51289 Bug ID: 51289 Summary: ws2_32:sock has siocatmark failures on wvistau64 Product: Wine Version: 6.10 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winsock Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com ws2_32:sock fails quite consistently on wvistau64: https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ws2_32:sock sock.c:3838: Test failed: FIONBIO returned 0 sock.c:3838: Test failed: SIOCATMARK returned 1 sock.c:3848: Test failed: FIONBIO returned 0 These failures happen consistently for both 32- and 64-bit tests on wvistau64 but only the 64-bit WineTest is run daily. They don't happen at all on wvista though so there must be some difference between these two VMs. wvista has the older ws2_32 dll (6.0.6001.18000 vs. 6.0.6002.18005 for wvistau64), which means the failures happen on the more recent ws2_32. This makes no sense so the root cause is probably elsewhere. The failures look like they might be timing related but while adding a Sleep(50) before the failing lines avoid the first 3838 failure, it's not reliable and does nothing for the 3848 failure. The failing tests were introduced in this commit: commit 2795fa9c00338bfff6304c1b756d1a58f9f6ca60 Author: Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu May 27 18:57:31 2021 -0500 ws2_32/tests: Separate and expand tests for FIONREAD and SIOCATMARK. Signed-off-by: Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> But the TestBot only reported the failures for the next patch in the series: https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2021-May/187782.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.