18 Jan
2003
18 Jan
'03
8:17 a.m.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2003-01-18 02:17 ------- Errhumm, can't we mention the stdole32.tlb thing somewhere within some related error message output in the trace ? (not doing so would be stupid IMHO :) Which error message would have to be modified, then ? Or maybe even several error messages in the trace from Mr. Seelhoff should mention the stdole32.tlb thing ? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.