https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50093 andy <andy86(a)fastwebnet.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #68918|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #9 from andy <andy86(a)fastwebnet.it> --- Comment on attachment 68918 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68918 Crash backtrace with builtin vulkan renderer (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #8)
I can't give particularly specific answers, as it's always hard to guess how much time it'll take to solve a bug, but generally it's much easier to fix a regression from a known patch than to debug one from scratch, especially when the fundamental problem is something like poor performance. Even if nothing else, it generally allows the offending patch to be reverted.
Thank you. Thank you. All in all I'm starting to think that finding a regression here might really take too long to be worth it.
Also, please file a separate bug report for the problem with the Vulkan renderer, rather than polluting this one.
Here: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50332 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.