http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10134 --- Comment #29 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2008-02-27 04:06:00 --- Hello, @Dmitry Timoshkov --- quote ---
Please do not post disassembled sections of microsoft code for any reason ever.
Even if that's the failing application code and not the OS one? --- quote --- Dan Kegel probably considers debugging *any* Microsoft produced code (installers, apps) potentially hostile/harmful - that far extends the wine restriction of not touching/looking at OS code. My snippets are *application* layer snippets - I don't consider .NET Framework a part of OS. I mainly post short app traces/assembly/pseudo code snippets for following reasons: - document/show interesting problems to readers - proof/evidence for people how stuff is accessed to justify my conclusions/writings/patches/input for patches - document my own work flow (bugzilla = "notepad") to be archived by google/mailing lists People aren't actually believing if I only write prose (good example from recent times: "the PEB loader lock needs to be exposed"). In fact some .NET patches would never made possible .. not mentioning countless analysis/patches from previous times. Anyway if you really take your policy to that extent then you should also disallow posting/attaching *any* backtraces and crashes from Microsoft related products (installers, apps) because technically they contain disassembly (although only a few opcode sequences from crash location). If you really persist this way then you have lost another supporter. I won't change my way of documenting bugs/supplying information. Period. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.