[Bug 40264] New: Iris Online cannot connect to login server
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Bug ID: 40264 Summary: Iris Online cannot connect to login server Product: Wine Version: 1.9.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winsock Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: noscrubs.net(a)gmail.com Created attachment 53881 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53881 Winsock trace from Linux and Mac OS X versions of wine. The game client cannot connect to the login server to authenticate the account. This works perfectly when running under the same version of Wine under Linux, and of course Windows. I have attached a short winsock trace that shows the differences when running under Linux and Mac OS X versions of Wine. I am also including a snippet of the client source relating to this log. The game client can be downloaded from http://noscrubs.net/downloads/NoScrubs_Iris_Online_Nov_2015.zip The launcher/patcher works fine apart from some HTML display issues. AppDB page: https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=33421&iTesting... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #1 from sedy <noscrubs.net(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 53882 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53882 Snippet of client source code relating to the logs. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- OSX does not like setting buffers to zero (as it does not make much sense anyway). You can edit wine source to fake success to work around it. Wine currently ignores low values for RCVBUF, maybe the same could be done to SNDBUF. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> --- Do you have the possibility to compile Wine yourself? If yes, please test if the following patch helps: http://ix.io/q0x -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #4 from sedy <noscrubs.net(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #2)
OSX does not like setting buffers to zero (as it does not make much sense anyway). You can edit wine source to fake success to work around it.
Wine currently ignores low values for RCVBUF, maybe the same could be done to SNDBUF.
Thanks for the incredibly fast response Bruno :)
From the source code comments: "Disable send buffering on the socket. Setting SO_SNDBUF to 0 causes winsock to stop buffering sends and perform sends directly from our buffers, thereby reducing CPU usage."
I changed the setsockopt buffer for SO_SNDBUF to 1 as a test, and the client can now successfully connect to the server, but it feels incredibly laggy. I'm not really seeing any problems in the logs though. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #5 from sedy <noscrubs.net(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Sebastian Lackner from comment #3)
Do you have the possibility to compile Wine yourself? If yes, please test if the following patch helps: http://ix.io/q0x
Thanks Sebastian, I will give it a go and let you know. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to sedy from comment #5)
(In reply to Sebastian Lackner from comment #3)
Do you have the possibility to compile Wine yourself? If yes, please test if the following patch helps: http://ix.io/q0x
Thanks Sebastian, I will give it a go and let you know.
Since you can compile the application and maybe if it is hard to compile wine you can achieve the same results as the patch by commenting the call do SNDBUF. Setting to 1 really is not useful and would cause problems in a third system (BSD). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Summary|Iris Online cannot connect |Iris Online cannot connect |to login server |to login server (SO_SNDBUF | |with value 0 is not allowed | |in OSX) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #7 from sedy <noscrubs.net(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #6)
(In reply to sedy from comment #5)
(In reply to Sebastian Lackner from comment #3)
Do you have the possibility to compile Wine yourself? If yes, please test if the following patch helps: http://ix.io/q0x
Thanks Sebastian, I will give it a go and let you know.
Since you can compile the application and maybe if it is hard to compile wine you can achieve the same results as the patch by commenting the call do SNDBUF. Setting to 1 really is not useful and would cause problems in a third system (BSD).
I can confirm that Sebastian's patch fixes the problem (compiled latest Wine) - the game client can connect to the server and there is no lag or disconnections, working perfectly :) I can also confirm that removing the code that sets the socket buffer to 0 in the game client source works too, so I will do that, but it might be worth adding Sebastian's fix as it may affect other games too? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #8 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to sedy from comment #7)
I can also confirm that removing the code that sets the socket buffer to 0 in the game client source works too, so I will do that, but it might be worth adding Sebastian's fix as it may affect other games too?
Yes, I agree with Sebastian's patch. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yuri(a)k2host.com.br --- Comment #9 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 40788 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |winetest(a)luukku.com --- Comment #10 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- Is there a reason we couldnt just make a operating system check into the patch? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebastian(a)fds-team.de --- Comment #11 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- (In reply to winetest from comment #10)
Is there a reason we couldnt just make a operating system check into the patch?
See bug 8606 it has a staging patch. That's what I was thinking. Do you think it's right way to fix this? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 --- Comment #12 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to winetest from comment #11)
(In reply to winetest from comment #10)
Is there a reason we couldnt just make a operating system check into the patch?
See bug 8606 it has a staging patch. That's what I was thinking. Do you think it's right way to fix this?
It is a possible way to fix that bug, this bug is a little different and for a different OS. It will be fixed at some point by the end of the year, no need to retest. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |e7fd1ac3b265f2f86ec832268db | |bc5425b78ecfc Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #13 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> --- Fixed by https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=e7fd1ac3b265f2f86ec832268... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 3.21. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |3.0.x -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40264 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.0.x |--- --- Comment #15 from Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)winehq.org> --- Removing the 3.0.x milestone from bug fixes included in 3.0.5. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org