[Bug 42835] New: redefinition of typedef 'WSD*'
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 Bug ID: 42835 Summary: redefinition of typedef 'WSD*' Product: Wine Version: 2.6 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: version2013(a)openmailbox.org Distribution: --- Created attachment 57929 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=57929 log.txt puppylinux 431 # gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 kernel version number # uname -r 2.6.30.5 # ldd --version ldd (GNU libc) 2.6.1 Applied patch from https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42478#c2 before configure. Compiling wine-2.6 fails with errors. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #1 from Nathan <version2013(a)openmailbox.org> --- Created attachment 57935 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=57935 log_2017Apr18 racy puppy 5.5 # gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.3.4 # uname -r 3.0.66 # ldd --version ldd (GNU libc) 2.10.1 Compiling wine-2.6 fails with errors. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b7.10110111(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111(a)gmail.com> --- Confirming. It's a regresssion: ab326fe56f91d8ce8fd42cea174b213743b41cb9 is the first bad commit commit ab326fe56f91d8ce8fd42cea174b213743b41cb9 Author: Owen Rudge <orudge(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Thu Apr 6 22:19:39 2017 +0100 wsdapi: Add stub implementation of IWSDiscoveryPublisher. Signed-off-by: Owen Rudge <orudge(a)codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> :040000 040000 d540aa3cf6d632315ab1dbdfbeb7663ebc2a97b0 31eb1754dac669ffa652851db95a3010fbbbc6c0 M dlls -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |owen(a)owenrudge.net -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #3 from Owen Rudge <owen(a)owenrudge.net> --- I'll look into this tonight. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #4 from Owen Rudge <owen(a)owenrudge.net> --- This bug should be fixed with the following patch: https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/132823 Apologies, it didn't show up using my version of gcc (4.9.x). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #5 from Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Owen Rudge from comment #4)
This bug should be fixed with the following patch:
I still get this after the patch: In file included from ../../include/wsdapi.h:24:0, from discovery.c:31: ../../include/wsdxmldom.h:22:29: error: redefinition of typedef ‘WSDXML_TYPE’ ../../include/wsdxml.h:39:29: note: previous declaration of ‘WSDXML_TYPE’ was here ../../include/wsdxmldom.h:23:34: error: redefinition of typedef ‘WSDXML_NAMESPACE’ ../../include/wsdxml.h:37:34: note: previous declaration of ‘WSDXML_NAMESPACE’ was here ../../include/wsdxmldom.h:24:29: error: redefinition of typedef ‘WSDXML_NAME’ ../../include/wsdxml.h:38:29: note: previous declaration of ‘WSDXML_NAME’ was here ../../include/wsdxmldom.h:28:32: error: redefinition of typedef ‘WSDXML_ELEMENT’ ../../include/wsdxml.h:40:32: note: previous declaration of ‘WSDXML_ELEMENT’ was here make[1]: *** [discovery.o] Error 1 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #6 from Owen Rudge <owen(a)owenrudge.net> --- https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/132856 should fix that, tested against gcc 4.4.7. (It appears the typedef redefinition is valid in C11, which newer versions of gcc default to, and this also matches what the Platform SDK does.) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #7 from Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Owen Rudge from comment #6)
https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/132856 should fix that, tested against gcc 4.4.7.
Yes, this does fix compilation for me now (with gcc 4.5). Thanks. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #8 from Nathan <version2013(a)openmailbox.org> --- I get 'wine build complete', after applying three patches from: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42478#c2 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c4 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c6 Thank you. # gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 Gijs Vermeulen <acescopezz(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |acescopezz(a)gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Gijs Vermeulen <acescopezz(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ruslan Kabatsayev from comment #7)
(In reply to Owen Rudge from comment #6)
https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/132856 should fix that, tested against gcc 4.4.7.
Yes, this does fix compilation for me now (with gcc 4.5). Thanks.
Could you mark this as fixed and fill the fixed sha1 with b7279badfa1583d9bb82bd951b0b621846cc38ea ? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #10 from Gijs Vermeulen <acescopezz(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Nathan from comment #8)
I get 'wine build complete', after applying three patches from: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42478#c2 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c4 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c6
Thank you.
# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.2
See the comment above (quoted the wrong person). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #11 from Nathan <version2013(a)openmailbox.org> --- Wine-2.7 I receive 'wine build complete' after applying one patch: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42478#c2 Wine source has the two patches: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c4 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c6 ... so no need to apply them in this compile. Thank you. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 --- Comment #12 from Gijs Vermeulen <acescopezz(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Nathan from comment #11)
Wine-2.7
I receive 'wine build complete' after applying one patch: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42478#c2
Wine source has the two patches: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c4 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835#c6
... so no need to apply them in this compile.
Thank you.
Then please mark this bug as fixed and fill in the fixed by sha-1 field with the hash I mentioned above. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 Nathan <version2013(a)openmailbox.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |b7279badfa1583d9bb82bd951b0 | |b621846cc38ea Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #13 from Nathan <version2013(a)openmailbox.org> --- Marked as fixed by SHA-1 b7279badfa1583d9bb82bd951b0b621846cc38ea -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42835 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 2.8. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org