[Bug 56375] New: execl does not work like in windows.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Bug ID: 56375 Summary: execl does not work like in windows. Product: Wine-gecko Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-gecko-unknown Assignee: jacek(a)codeweavers.com Reporter: sergiotarxz(a)posteo.net Distribution: --- Something that bothers me since many time ago is that when you develop Windows applications in Linux testing in Wine a common pitfall is that execl won't work equal so a perfectly working program in wine won't work at all in windows. I do not know why in wine execl will search path and it is more permissive with the contents of the second argument while in windows it only allows relative or absolute paths and the second argument must have a correct content. Is there something that can be done? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 --- Comment #1 from Sergio <sergiotarxz(a)posteo.net> --- With execl I refer to the unistd.h functions of course. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Sergio <sergiotarxz(a)posteo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Wine-gecko |Wine Component|wine-gecko-unknown |-unknown -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dark.shadow4(a)web.de --- Comment #2 from Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> --- Can you provide a concrete example? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Sergio <sergiotarxz(a)posteo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Sergio <sergiotarxz(a)posteo.net> --- I think execl does not actually have this problem finally, I tried to reproduce but could not. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56375 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Actually closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla