[Bug 18070] New: Regresion in Dreamweaver CS3 Installer
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Summary: Regresion in Dreamweaver CS3 Installer Product: Wine Version: 1.1.19 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jaimerave(a)gmail.com This commit make the installer fail when it's starting. b8965ee7c90a687af4c84ad0ede73b1df901e16c is first bad commit commit b8965ee7c90a687af4c84ad0ede73b1df901e16c Author: Hans Leidekker <hans(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Tue Mar 24 10:26:24 2009 +0100 msi: Don't initialize COM for custom action threads. :040000 040000 e3395252ab46bf3c623252deb94ceba713c0596a 7e7d74822b91c0a5981893f375a05c22bb144360 M dlls -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hans(a)meelstraat.net --- Comment #1 from Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-15 21:59:20 --- Adding Hans to the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression Summary|Regresion in Dreamweaver CS3|Dreamweaver CS3 Installer |Installer |fails to start -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-16 00:47:44 --- Please attach a +msi,+msidb trace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #3 from Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-16 06:10:59 --- Created an attachment (id=20480) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20480) Console Output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #20480|text/plain |application/octet-stream mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #4 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-04-16 15:10:43 --- I'd like to see a +msi,+relay,+seh trace. Custom actions execute arbitrary code, so +msi may not reveal enough information. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #5 from Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-18 00:38:47 --- The +msi,+relay,+seh trace was more than 1 MB so I upload it to RapidShare. The link is: http://rapidshare.com/files/222695971/log.txt.tar.bz2.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net --- Comment #6 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-04-27 17:13:34 --- Hello, well the custom action thread tries to use MSXML6 COM inproc server and fails because there is no apartment (COM not initialized). There are basically two problems here. One part (reuse of existing MTA) is covered by my bug 17902 though CoGetClassObject() is the culprit there. As for the other part, I found the following blog containing useful information regarding custom actions and COM: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2005/02/07/368917.aspx --- quote --- ... This question rang a bell so I dug into some of the emails that have gone across our internal Windows Installer question-n-answer alias and here is the official answer from the Windows Installer team: "One of the first things that a custom action server does when it is created is to call CoInitializeEx(0, COINIT_MULTITHREADED). However, the thread on which a DLL custom action is run is different from the main thread (on which COM is initialized) and COM will not be initialized on it. It is up to the custom action to initialize COM to its liking." --- quote --- Because the custom action thread which executes "Adobe_ProcessPropertyFile" CA doesn't initialize COM explicitly (not creating apartment), the MTA from the main thread has to be used. The problem is: there is no custom action server the blog talks about here which does this. Msi will be called in the context of installer threads which might have or have not initialized COM in various ways. One solution could be to have Wine's Msi create a dedicated thread serving as "fake" CA server main thread which creates an MTA if not already exist by calling CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED). All custom action threads that don't explicitly initialize COM would be then part of that MTA (which is guaranteed to be an MTA, not relying on installer STA threads). Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #7 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-05-05 13:16:39 --- Hello, although Hans implemented reuse of existing MTA part now (commit bd4975acb0b682bbf2b4934d12f942ea629f5bbb) which fixes my bug 17902 *g* this still might not be enough for Adobe and possibly other installers. Wine needs to ensure there _is_ an MTA present for CA's If the app installer only consists of single threaded apartments or the installer didn't initialize COM at all, custom actions will still fail. An indication might be messages like that: --- snip --- err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised ... err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action "foo" returned "bar" --- snip --- Maybe you can take up my suggestion about creating an msi (internal) thread solely for the purpose of ensuring MTA present which CA's can reuse. Don't use the app/installer own threads to initialize the COM MTA, it would backfire when the app later decides to initialize COM with a different model (STA). Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicklas(a)ws.se --- Comment #8 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-05-14 08:00:41 --- *** Bug 18228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #9 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-05-14 08:02:12 --- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com --- Comment #10 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-05-16 10:41:07 --- *** Bug 17070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.2.0 --- Comment #11 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-05-16 10:58:00 --- Good analysis, affects many apps, key subsystem -> nominating for 1.s -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ljuwaidah(a)gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-18 14:00:42 --- *** Bug 16795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Peet Andrew <ekstasis0(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ekstasis0(a)gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Peet Andrew <ekstasis0(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-04 17:16:33 --- When will this error been fixed? I have now, not been able to install Photoshop CS4 from wine-1.1.18 to wine-1.1.22 how many versions do you think of coming before it gets fixed? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #14 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-06-04 23:37:00 --- (In reply to comment #13)
When will this error been fixed? I have now, not been able to install Photoshop CS4 from wine-1.1.18 to wine-1.1.22 how many versions do you think of coming before it gets fixed?
Feel free to send patches. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #15 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-06-05 02:05:24 --- (In reply to comment #13)
When will this error been fixed?
Not repeating the somewhat acidulous "feel free to send patches"-comment of Dmitry, it seems to have been nominated to be done before the next major stable release, which would be 1.2. Hopefully, a solution will be available in earlier releases. Thing is that this does not seem to be simply a bug, but also a design issue, which makes it a bit bigger. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gewoonernst(a)gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-06-14 14:18:08 --- *** Bug 18938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download, Installer Summary|Dreamweaver CS3 Installer |Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |fails to start |fail --- Comment #17 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-06-14 14:20:53 --- Making title more generic, reported to affect all CS3/CS4 applications. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #18 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-06-20 23:36:28 --- Patch sent, http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-June/074531.html I just typed it in and only very lightly tested it, but it seems to work. At the very least it demonstrates that Anastasius was on target as usual. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #19 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-06-21 16:55:58 --- thank you, this patch worked for me! my wine version is 1.1.24 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #20 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-06-21 16:57:46 --- thank you, this patch worked for me! my wine version is 1.1.24 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #21 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-06-22 16:16:36 --- sory but for cs3 installer failed with "Critical errors were found in setup. Please see the Setup log file for details. log file ... Using cached language set HTML data complete: personalization Using cached language set [ 44] Mon Jun 22 23:10:56 2009 FATAL Critical errors were found in setup Please see the Setup log file for details. [ 44] Mon Jun 22 23:10:58 2009 INFO *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* END - Installer Session *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* and cs4 installer failed with Error message: Adobe Anchor Service CS4 Error 1603 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |james2432(a)gmail.com --- Comment #22 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-06-24 07:15:17 --- *** Bug 19057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Cornbread <richard(a)cornbread.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |richard(a)cornbread.cc --- Comment #23 from Cornbread <richard(a)cornbread.cc> 2009-06-29 19:46:16 --- So is commit b8965ee7c90a687af4c84ad0ede73b1df901e16c a bad commit? or is it a step in the right direction it just breaks some installers currently? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #24 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-06-29 19:50:48 --- It was probably a correct change that exposed a problem. It's probably a week's worth of work to fix the newly exposed problem correctly. Don't know for sure yet if Alexandre will insist on that, or if he'll accept something like my easy workaround patch (suitable improved). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Javier Berezovsky <javierbere(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |javierbere(a)gmail.com --- Comment #25 from Javier Berezovsky <javierbere(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-29 21:20:06 --- At lest the reason was finally found :] Looking forward to seeing a fix/workaround soon. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #26 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-06-30 04:27:25 ---
So is commit b8965ee7c90a687af4c84ad0ede73b1df901e16c a bad commit? or is it a step in the right direction it just breaks some installers currently?
It's a step in the right direction. Before that commit office 2007 service pack 1 and other installers would fail because of custom actions with conflicting demands for COM initialization. FWIW, I think an improved version of Dan's patch would be acceptable, after testing with some more installers. MS installers are good candidates since they seem to consistently check the result of CoInitialize(). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #27 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-01 11:59:46 --- (In reply to comment #26)
FWIW, I think an improved version of Dan's patch would be acceptable, after testing with some more installers. MS installers are good candidates since they seem to consistently check the result of CoInitialize().
I'd be happy to run my application test suite on any candidate patches.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #28 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-07-01 16:11:33 --- Hello, you need to put more love into it else nothing will happen and people will suffer for a long time. Sure, any solution that creates MTA helper thread within app process remains sort of a hack until Wine Msi can roll its own custom action server. As already said: avoid using DllMain for dedicated threads. Ideal would be a place where one can control the startup and shutdown of MTA helper thread within same function scope while avoiding/minimizing the need for recreation it due to multiple custom actions. Have a look at MSI_InstallPackage. All applicable custom actions are run from within that entry. MTA helper thread creation should be done before any ACTION_ProcessExecSequence(). MTA helper thread shutdown should be done after ACTION_FinishCustomActions() to ensure deferred/pending custom actions have ended. Use event signalling not only for shutdown but also for startup to prevent possible race condition between threads, ensuring CoInitializeEx() is called from MTA helper thread before any custom action is run. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #29 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-07-02 03:49:20 --- Created an attachment (id=22139) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22139) msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA. Here's an improved version of Dan's patch. Please test. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #30 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-07-02 09:30:53 --- Works for me, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #31 from Cornbread <richard(a)cornbread.cc> 2009-07-02 22:35:44 --- How do we apply this patch? sorry patch newb... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #32 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-02 23:07:15 --- (In reply to comment #31)
How do we apply this patch? sorry patch newb...
http://wiki.winehq.org/Patching -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #33 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-07-02 23:16:39 --- Our FAQ didn't answer that question, so I added it: http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-7ed3c3163e2b932ee2030a48f9c5e553dc41817b -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #34 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-07-03 18:18:07 --- i have the msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch tested. This is worked in 64 bit ubunutu jaunty. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #35 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-06 00:21:17 --- (In reply to comment #29)
Created an attachment (id=22139) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22139) [details] msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA.
Here's an improved version of Dan's patch. Please test.
http://austinenglish.com/logs/appinstall-bug_18070_test/ Works fine for all the programs currently being tested. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Daniel Wallace <daniel.wallace(a)akibauplink.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel.wallace(a)akibauplink. | |com --- Comment #36 from Daniel Wallace <daniel.wallace(a)akibauplink.com> 2009-07-08 14:28:12 --- On my gentoo x86_64 system, patching 1.1.25 with Hans' patch allows me to get farther in the Photoshop CS3 installer. I then run into bug 15590 but if I use Hans' workaround of bringing down all interfaces, I'm able to install completely. Thanks Hans! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #37 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-21 21:13:11 --- I can get up to the license agreement but when I click on Accept it does nothing I've compiled from git: wine-1.1.26-82-gda86ab7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #38 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-21 21:29:17 --- Created an attachment (id=22518) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22518) Console Output[+trace, wine-1.1.26-82-gda86ab7] Pressing on accept button does nothing, added output -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #39 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-07-22 03:04:00 --- see Bug 18681. try winetricks ie6. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #22518|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #40 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 06:08:08 --- Created an attachment (id=22524) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22524) Console Output[+trace, wine-1.1.26-82-gda86ab7] Photoshop/Bridge Fail CS4 When installing ie6 with winetricks you can get past the I Agree button, then when it goes to install it says that Photoshop CS4 and Bridge CS4 have failed to install do you wish to continue or cancel? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #22518|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #40 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 06:08:08 --- Created an attachment (id=22524) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22524) Console Output[+trace, wine-1.1.26-82-gda86ab7] Photoshop/Bridge Fail CS4 When installing ie6 with winetricks you can get past the I Agree button, then when it goes to install it says that Photoshop CS4 and Bridge CS4 have failed to install do you wish to continue or cancel? --- Comment #41 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 12:51:23 --- (In reply to comment #40)
When installing ie6 with winetricks you can get past the I Agree button, then when it goes to install it says that Photoshop CS4 and Bridge CS4 have failed to install do you wish to continue or cancel?
Now this might not be the reason for the failure, but I am not sure that bridge is installable yet(even though that would have been great). Have you tried deselecting bridge during the installation? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #42 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 13:06:33 --- (In reply to comment #41)
Now this might not be the reason for the failure, but I am not sure that bridge is installable yet(even though that would have been great). Have you tried deselecting bridge during the installation?
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #42 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 13:06:33 --- (In reply to comment #41)
Now this might not be the reason for the failure, but I am not sure that bridge is installable yet(even though that would have been great). Have you tried deselecting bridge during the installation?
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening --- Comment #43 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 13:18:05 --- (In reply to comment #42)
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening
Ok. Anyway, I had to install all these until my installation worked. sh winetricks msxml6 gdiplus gecko vcrun2005 ie6 Now, I really can't recommend you to use that much winetricks stuff since it hides problems and some of them might not be needed anymore. But I suppose you could start with what seems the first issue in the log, msxml6, see what happens, then gdiplus, then vcrun2005 to try to find the first working solution. Actually I am not sure when to use winetricks and when to submit a bug. The projects' actual ambitions are not that clear to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #42 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 13:06:33 --- (In reply to comment #41)
Now this might not be the reason for the failure, but I am not sure that bridge is installable yet(even though that would have been great). Have you tried deselecting bridge during the installation?
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening --- Comment #43 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 13:18:05 --- (In reply to comment #42)
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening
Ok. Anyway, I had to install all these until my installation worked. sh winetricks msxml6 gdiplus gecko vcrun2005 ie6 Now, I really can't recommend you to use that much winetricks stuff since it hides problems and some of them might not be needed anymore. But I suppose you could start with what seems the first issue in the log, msxml6, see what happens, then gdiplus, then vcrun2005 to try to find the first working solution. Actually I am not sure when to use winetricks and when to submit a bug. The projects' actual ambitions are not that clear to me. --- Comment #44 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-07-22 13:26:17 --- Almost any use of winetricks is a workaround for a wine bug. Many of my wine bug reports go like this: Program X wouldn't ...; the log shows ... winetricks Z works around the failure and lets you continue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #42 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 13:06:33 --- (In reply to comment #41)
Now this might not be the reason for the failure, but I am not sure that bridge is installable yet(even though that would have been great). Have you tried deselecting bridge during the installation?
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening --- Comment #43 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 13:18:05 --- (In reply to comment #42)
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening
Ok. Anyway, I had to install all these until my installation worked. sh winetricks msxml6 gdiplus gecko vcrun2005 ie6 Now, I really can't recommend you to use that much winetricks stuff since it hides problems and some of them might not be needed anymore. But I suppose you could start with what seems the first issue in the log, msxml6, see what happens, then gdiplus, then vcrun2005 to try to find the first working solution. Actually I am not sure when to use winetricks and when to submit a bug. The projects' actual ambitions are not that clear to me. --- Comment #44 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-07-22 13:26:17 --- Almost any use of winetricks is a workaround for a wine bug. Many of my wine bug reports go like this: Program X wouldn't ...; the log shows ... winetricks Z works around the failure and lets you continue. --- Comment #45 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 13:31:50 --- (In reply to comment #43)
(In reply to comment #42)
Not yet, bridge use to install perfect on 1.1.19(I guess things have changed..) i'll clean wine and try again this evening
Ok. Anyway, I had to install all these until my installation worked. sh winetricks msxml6 gdiplus gecko vcrun2005 ie6
Now, I really can't recommend you to use that much winetricks stuff since it hides problems and some of them might not be needed anymore. But I suppose you could start with what seems the first issue in the log, msxml6, see what happens, then gdiplus, then vcrun2005 to try to find the first working solution.
Actually I am not sure when to use winetricks and when to submit a bug. The projects' actual ambitions are not that clear to me.
I think you are only allowed to use gecko, but now if you don't have the engine installed it will prompt you to download it and install it(no need for winetricks). Currently I only have ie6 installed to get past the "I agree" I'll try to find an incremental solution -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #46 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-22 14:01:30 --- (In reply to comment #43)
Actually I am not sure when to use winetricks and when to submit a bug. The projects' actual ambitions are not that clear to me.
Winetricks is used to workaround wine (e.g., msxml3/pdh) or application (not bundling visual basic/c runtimes) bugs. If you use winetricks to workaround a bug, be sure to mention it in the bug report (with a link to the bug you worked around). IE6 is a bit of special case, since it's also meant to be used instead of ies4linux. IE6 also works around bugs in wine's mshtml/shdocvw implementations. The case here may be a jscript bug (based on some of the comments, though I haven't verified this myself). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #47 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 14:45:16 --- (In reply to comment #45,#46,#47) Yeah, I have seen especially Dan Kegel submitting numerous bugs with regards to the CSn-series. However, I am not nearly as initiated, so when I look at the logs I have problems knowing what to report, because I don't know which tricks are "legal" to make a certain application work in wine. For example, It would feel kind of pointless to file a ".NET 3.5 is not implemented" bug. In this case, IE6 seems to be allowed since there is some unspecified problem with gecko. gdiplus as well, if I look at the Dan's "How Bugs Affect Application". So what does that mean? Should I always try installing IE6 and gdiplus before making a bug report? My point is, if an application requires that winetricks redistributables(which never will be implemented in wine) are installed, shouldn't that say somewhere? Like a version-level installation instruction field? Wouldn't that make it much easier to control and lessen the amount of questions? Just a thought. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #48 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-07-22 14:54:42 ---
if an application requires that winetricks redistributables (which never will be implemented in wine) are installed, shouldn't that say somewhere?
Yes, in the appdb. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #49 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 15:14:48 --- (In reply to comment #48)
if an application requires that winetricks redistributables (which never will be implemented in wine) are installed, shouldn't that say somewhere?
Yes, in the appdb.
Oops. Missed the "add HOWTO" button. :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #49 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-07-22 15:14:48 --- (In reply to comment #48)
if an application requires that winetricks redistributables (which never will be implemented in wine) are installed, shouldn't that say somewhere?
Yes, in the appdb.
Oops. Missed the "add HOWTO" button. :-) --- Comment #50 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-23 19:09:52 --- Doesn't work for me with : msxml6 gdiplus gecko vcrun2005 ie6 allfonts Still getting the same error as earlyer -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #51 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-08-05 02:37:18 --- (In reply to comment #47)
Yeah, I have seen especially Dan Kegel submitting numerous bugs with regards to
Ehum, that should have been Ken Sharp(not that Dan hasn't been at it), sorry about the mix up. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #52 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-08-09 04:02:07 --- Created an attachment (id=22915) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22915) This is a dump of Adobe photoshop failing to install on 1.1.27. Test data here: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14318 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #22915|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #53 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-08-09 04:07:11 --- Created an attachment (id=22916) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22916) This is a dump of Adobe photoshop failing to install on 1.1.27. Appdb test data: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14318&iTestingI... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #54 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-08-09 04:20:40 --- Hello, there is no need to provide test data. The problem is well known and a short-term hack-patch exists which was consequently rejected by AJ. Until someone takes up the task to implement "remote" custom actions (custom action server) you'll have to use the hack-patch. Unfortunately this whole bug is now messed up with many useless/irritating comments that have nothing to do with the original bug. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #55 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-08-09 14:08:03 --- (In reply to comment #54)
Hello,
there is no need to provide test data. The problem is well known and a short-term hack-patch exists which was consequently rejected by AJ.
I was not aware of this. I was just trying to help out to show how it was on the latest version.
Until someone takes up the task to implement "remote" custom actions (custom action server) you'll have to use the hack-patch.
Ok, that's a letdown.
Unfortunately this whole bug is now messed up with many useless/irritating comments that have nothing to do with the original bug.
I am sorry if I have irritated you, it was a mistake, I thought the comment on the attachment was going to end up under the attachment details, an not on the bug, I had forgot how that worked. Please feel free to delete all comments you feel are redundant(like this one and the preceeding short discussion). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Spoon <spoon(a)geekmail.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spoon(a)geekmail.de --- Comment #56 from Spoon <spoon(a)geekmail.de> 2009-08-16 11:15:34 --- (In reply to comment #43)
... Ok. Anyway, I had to install all these until my installation worked. sh winetricks msxml6 gdiplus gecko vcrun2005 ie6
Now, I really can't recommend you to use that much winetricks stuff since it hides problems and some of them might not be needed anymore. But I suppose you could start with what seems the first issue in the log, msxml6, see what happens, then gdiplus, then vcrun2005 to try to find the first working solution. ...
For me the first working solution was only installing gecko and msxml6. Installation succeeded on all components except Adobe VersionCue. (Wine 1.1.27) Thank you so much! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #57 from Nicklas Börjesson <nicklas(a)ws.se> 2009-08-16 12:11:41 --- (In reply to comment #56)
For me the first working solution was only installing gecko and msxml6. Installation succeeded on all components except Adobe VersionCue. (Wine 1.1.27)
Let me get this straight, it worked to install PS CS4 without reverting to an older version? And the with only gecko msxml6? In any case, the lessened need for winetricks is really great news. If you could submit a test result, it would be great. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #58 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-16 12:33:04 --- And was that on a clean .wine? Color me skeptical... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #59 from Spoon <spoon(a)geekmail.de> 2009-08-16 15:16:01 --- (In reply to comment #57)
... Let me get this straight, it worked to install PS CS4 without reverting to an older version? And the with only gecko msxml6? In any case, the lessened need for winetricks is really great news. If you could submit a test result, it would be great.
It was CS3 and I didn't revert to an older version, but of course I used the patch mentioned above. As for the test results, would a log of the terminal output be sufficient, or do you need any debug traces? In fact I have never submitted any test results... I more or less just stumbled in here, on my never ending journey to get dreamweaver running... (In reply to comment #58)
And was that on a clean .wine?
Color me skeptical...
Yes, it was clean. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #60 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-16 15:25:44 --- "For me the first working solution was only installing gecko and msxml6." You forgot to mention the patch. Rather crucial detail :-) No logs, please, we understand the bug well enough already. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |fail |SDK?) installers fail --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. --- Comment #63 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-22 22:49:20 --- The Vista SDK installer is throwing errors like err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |fail |SDK?) installers fail --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. --- Comment #63 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-22 22:49:20 --- The Vista SDK installer is throwing errors like err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- Comment #64 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-08-23 06:07:05 --- Hello, --- quote --- err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- quote --- No, you shouldn't mix up different issues here. This whole bug thread gets more and more messy. You are talking about bug 19636. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |fail |SDK?) installers fail Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |SDK?) installers fail |fail --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. --- Comment #63 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-22 22:49:20 --- The Vista SDK installer is throwing errors like err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- Comment #64 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-08-23 06:07:05 --- Hello, --- quote --- err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- quote --- No, you shouldn't mix up different issues here. This whole bug thread gets more and more messy. You are talking about bug 19636. Regards --- Comment #65 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-23 09:14:03 --- OK, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |fail |SDK?) installers fail Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |SDK?) installers fail |fail Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nana(a)nanresources.net --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. --- Comment #63 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-22 22:49:20 --- The Vista SDK installer is throwing errors like err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- Comment #64 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-08-23 06:07:05 --- Hello, --- quote --- err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- quote --- No, you shouldn't mix up different issues here. This whole bug thread gets more and more messy. You are talking about bug 19636. Regards --- Comment #65 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-23 09:14:03 --- OK, thanks. --- Comment #66 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-02 18:18:04 --- *** Bug 19910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |fail |SDK?) installers fail Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |SDK?) installers fail |fail Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nana(a)nanresources.net Olivier Van Acker <cyberroadie(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cyberroadie(a)gmail.com --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. --- Comment #63 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-22 22:49:20 --- The Vista SDK installer is throwing errors like err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- Comment #64 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-08-23 06:07:05 --- Hello, --- quote --- err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- quote --- No, you shouldn't mix up different issues here. This whole bug thread gets more and more messy. You are talking about bug 19636. Regards --- Comment #65 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-23 09:14:03 --- OK, thanks. --- Comment #66 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-02 18:18:04 --- *** Bug 19910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |fail |SDK?) installers fail Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 (and Vista |Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |SDK?) installers fail |fail Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nana(a)nanresources.net Olivier Van Acker <cyberroadie(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cyberroadie(a)gmail.com Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |scott(a)open-vote.org --- Comment #61 from cem <cemelmaci(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:32:24 --- msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch? --- Comment #62 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-19 08:35:26 --- (In reply to comment #61)
msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA patch is worked. when accepting the patch?
They aren't. If you read this thread on the bug, the patch is simply that A PATCH(a work-around) a bigger problem, which they have to implement. --- Comment #63 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-22 22:49:20 --- The Vista SDK installer is throwing errors like err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- Comment #64 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-08-23 06:07:05 --- Hello, --- quote --- err:ole:CoInitializeEx Attempt to change threading model of this apartment from multi-threaded to apartment threaded err:msi:ACTION_CreateShortcuts CoInitialize failed err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"InstallFinalize" returned 1627 Perhaps it also suffers from this? --- quote --- No, you shouldn't mix up different issues here. This whole bug thread gets more and more messy. You are talking about bug 19636. Regards --- Comment #65 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-08-23 09:14:03 --- OK, thanks. --- Comment #66 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-02 18:18:04 --- *** Bug 19910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Comment #67 from Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> 2009-09-30 09:59:00 --- I'm considering rolling Hans' patch into the distribution package I ship with Ubuntu 9.10 (I'm shipping both Wine 1.0 and a recent Wine beta) -- is there any plausible downside to it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #68 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> 2009-09-30 10:51:16 --- Personally I don't see a problem in including the patch in the "beta" builds, not until someone starts work on the service -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #69 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-09-30 10:54:08 --- Make sure it doesn't cause any regressions in appinstall (have you run austin's script yet?) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |15584 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |15583 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |15582 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #70 from Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> 2009-10-13 22:57:04 --- I tried applying the workaround patch to Wine 1.1.31 but the demo is still failing with the same error as before. Can someone else confirm that it no longer works? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #71 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-10-14 06:49:43 --- Patch works fine for me for PS CS4. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Diffident <mareko(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |20436 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|20436 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |20492 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Benjamin_Schulz(a)gmx.de --- Comment #72 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2009-11-20 19:37:46 --- *** Bug 20723 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #73 from Toni Spets <toni.spets(a)iki.fi> 2009-12-06 11:49:55 --- Created an attachment (id=25093) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25093) msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA (wine-1.1.34) I rebased the original patch to apply cleanly on 1.1.34. The installer itself seems to work better than before, all dialogs are drawn correctly and work (compared to 1.1.33 where texts overlap). During the installation process itself it fails when installing Photoshop CS4. The installer then exits telling that it failed to install Photoshop. I tested with the tryout package which is linked from the appdb entry. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Toni Spets <toni.spets(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toni.spets(a)iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Bug 18070 depends on bug 20492, which changed state. Bug 20492 Summary: Adobe CS4 installer hangs in memory and has to be killed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20492 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jelle De Loecker <skerit(a)kipdola.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skerit(a)kipdola.com --- Comment #74 from Jelle De Loecker <skerit(a)kipdola.com> 2009-12-15 17:34:28 --- I've tested this patch (#25093) for Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 & CS4. On CS3 it will get to the setup initialization screen (which is a huge improvement) but it will just hang at that point. CS4 actually manages to install perfectly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |major --- Comment #75 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2010-03-05 01:37:51 --- Lots of apps affected - major. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.harrison(a)baroni-li | |mited.com --- Comment #76 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2010-03-05 12:29:27 --- *** Bug 21914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jonas Heinrich <onny(a)project-insanity.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |onny(a)project-insanity.org --- Comment #77 from Jonas Heinrich <onny(a)project-insanity.org> 2010-04-18 14:53:28 --- so, why not apply this patch to the next wine-version? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #78 from Jonas Heinrich <onny(a)project-insanity.org> 2010-05-29 13:38:45 --- Created an attachment (id=28390) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28390) AfterEffects CS4 setup crashed (wine1.2rc2) I could select the trial-setup but while showing the "choose language"-dialog on the second page, it crashed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #79 from Jonas Heinrich <onny(a)project-insanity.org> 2010-05-29 13:40:00 --- Created an attachment (id=28391) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28391) PremierePro CS4 setup crashed (wine1.2rc2) The initialization-window does not disappear and the setup stops working :( -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Dave <slamdunk84(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slamdunk84(a)gmail.com --- Comment #80 from Dave <slamdunk84(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-09 05:39:03 --- (In reply to comment #77)
so, why not apply this patch to the next wine-version?
I hope that will be done and this bug will be fixed for 1.2. This one bug is the only reason I still need to use Windows every now and then. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |20436 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Carlton Hobbs <carlton.hobbs(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carlton.hobbs(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Richard <shiningarcanine(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shiningarcanine(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Octavian Voicu <octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #81 from Richard <shiningarcanine(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-27 13:54:57 --- Are the trials for Adobe CS4 software still available? It seems to me that it would be difficult for most people to work on this without some sort of trial download link. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Andrej C. <andrej.cremoznik(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrej.cremoznik(a)gmail.com --- Comment #82 from Andrej C. <andrej.cremoznik(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-27 15:46:08 --- CS4 trial is still available here: http://adobe-photoshop.en.softonic.com/download-version/adobe-photoshop-CS4 Link points to depositfiles which, unfortunately, might block some countries at certain times. Please fix this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #83 from Jonas Heinrich <onny(a)project-insanity.org> 2010-08-26 10:30:11 --- Bug is still present in Wine 1.3.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 trusktr <jp(a)bettafootwear.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jp(a)bettafootwear.com --- Comment #84 from trusktr <jp(a)bettafootwear.com> 2010-09-03 18:52:24 CDT --- Hey, for what version of Wine is Hans' patch intended for? Because I tried patching my 1.3.1 but it didn't work, hehe. Can someone make a patch for 1.3.1 ?? :D :D :D -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #85 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2010-09-03 18:54:04 CDT --- Did you try the rebased one, from comment #73 ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #86 from trusktr <jp(a)bettafootwear.com> 2010-09-04 11:33:28 CDT --- (In reply to comment #85)
Did you try the rebased one, from comment #73 ?
Yeah, i tried it on wine 1.3.1 but not on 1.1.34 yet hehe. Um... But I have an idea. I'm just going to install Adobe Master Collection CS5 in windows then perform digital surgery and transplant it to wine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #87 from trusktr <jp(a)bettafootwear.com> 2010-09-04 11:47:40 CDT --- (In reply to comment #85)
Did you try the rebased one, from comment #73 ?
Oh, hehe, Dan, by the way, how do I perform this digital surgery? :D -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #88 from trusktr <jp(a)bettafootwear.com> 2010-09-04 11:51:24 CDT --- By the way, has anyone requested a custom build using this patch yet (http://www.playonlinux.com/repository/wine-demand.php)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 rusivi <rusivi1(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rusivi1(a)gmail.com --- Comment #89 from rusivi <rusivi1(a)gmail.com> 2010-09-13 18:08:25 CDT --- Does this occur in newest WINE? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 mail(a)thirtytwobit.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mail(a)thirtytwobit.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |19571 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #90 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2010-11-24 17:41:38 CST --- With a patched version of 1.3.7 the Accept button on the licence screen doesn't do anything, so cannot continue. This must be a regression as it did not do this before. Will look into this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #91 from Cornbread <richard(a)cornbread.cc> 2010-12-15 22:03:45 CST --- I vote that this gets fixed before 4-15. Would be nice to not have this bug go over the 2 year mark... This is a pretty high priority app in many circles just surprising it's gone this long without a proper fix. Looks like all adobe has to do to stop linux adoption is make the installer not clickable or simply fail. :P -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #92 from mail(a)thirtytwobit.com 2010-12-16 08:29:08 CST --- Shame that the installer fails when Photoshop, Dreamweaver and possibly more from the suite do actually work once setup but props to those that can hack at Wine and have gotten us this far. Always been patient as understand these things take effort but would particularly love to see this fixed as might mean people then start looking at getting other programs from the suite working. Since this only covers CS3 + CS4 might be worth mentioning there's also bug reports raised for CS5... http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22680 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22679 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |williamdunne5(a)hotmail.co.uk --- Comment #93 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2010-12-20 17:06:10 CST --- *** Bug 25571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Asterios <avounotr(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avounotr(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Sylvain Petreolle <spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Mani Rai <rai.mani(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rai.mani(a)hotmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kp-pav(a)yandex.ru --- Comment #94 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2011-05-21 02:46:42 CDT --- *** Bug 26484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://adobe-photoshop.en.s | |oftonic.com/download-versio | |n/adobe-photoshop-CS4 Summary|Adobe CS3/CS4 installers |Multiple apps need separate |fail |msi custom action server | |process due to COM/MTA | |and/or isolation issues | |(Adobe CS3/CS4, Flash, | |Windows SDK 2008, | |Strawberry Perl) --- Comment #95 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2011-05-21 02:52:12 CDT --- Hello, refining summary. There are more apps that need separate CA server process either to fix COM/MTA problems or for isolation (crash handler invocations). Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fracting(a)gmail.com --- Comment #96 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2011-06-21 01:45:26 CDT --- *** Bug 27546 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1| |b8965ee7c90a687af4c84ad0ede | |73b1df901e16c -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Igor Franchuk <sprog(a)online.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sprog(a)online.ru --- Comment #97 from Igor Franchuk <sprog(a)online.ru> 2011-09-13 03:58:00 CDT --- The bug is still in Wine 1.3.27 (amd64) err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised fixme:advapi:SetNamedSecurityInfoW L"C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Common Files\\Adobe\\caps" 1 -2147483644 0x172b2c 0x172b38 0x172c00 (nil) err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"ProcessPropertyFile.E35C3ECB_5FDA_49E1_AB1F_D472B7CB9017" returned 1603 End Adobe Setup. Exit code: 4 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #98 from Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> 2011-09-15 15:51:19 CDT --- With 1.3.28: Adding the dummy thread patch lets the Photoshop CS4 Installer (linked above) start, however it fails to complete for some other reason. It looks like clicking the Next button on the license screen isn't doing anything (it generates an OLE warning each time in the terminal). Without the dummy thread patch, the installer gets an error before its first screen. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |teyssandier.william(a)free.fr --- Comment #99 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-02 11:23:22 CDT --- *** Bug 21345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Viktoria <viktoria.s(a)freemail.hu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |viktoria.s(a)freemail.hu -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 gabriel <gabrieluiz07(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gabrieluiz07(a)hotmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 JKAbrams <jonasa(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonasa(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #100 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2012-03-09 14:52:24 CST --- *** Bug 15432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Robert Munteanu <robert.munteanu(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |robert.munteanu(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |17212 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |29354 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 NSLW <lukasz.wojnilowicz(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lukasz.wojnilowicz(a)gmail.co | |m --- Comment #101 from NSLW <lukasz.wojnilowicz(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-04 06:46:42 CDT --- *** Bug 30589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Miroslav.Ilias(a)umb.sk --- Comment #102 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2012-05-11 04:25:25 CDT --- *** Bug 30646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #103 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2012-05-15 07:20:25 CDT --- *** Bug 30680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |19572, 20954, 20958 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Brandon Corujo <haku08879(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haku08879(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Soohyun Lee <soohyun2222(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |soohyun2222(a)gmail.com --- Comment #104 from Soohyun Lee <soohyun2222(a)gmail.com> 2013-01-11 03:08:00 CST --- *** Bug 32689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Sergey Sarbash <sarbash.s(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sarbash.s(a)gmail.com --- Comment #105 from Sergey Sarbash <sarbash.s(a)gmail.com> 2013-02-01 00:03:15 CST --- Applied the patch mentioned in #73 to the current source 1.5.22. Only last hunk was failed so applied it manually. Now, only "winetricks ie6" and Indesign CS3 was installed successfully. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvtlth(a)live.de --- Comment #106 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> 2013-05-28 15:42:58 CDT --- *** Bug 33671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Multiple apps need separate |Multiple apps need separate |msi custom action server |msi custom action server |process due to COM/MTA |process due to COM/MTA |and/or isolation issues |and/or isolation issues |(Adobe CS3/CS4, Flash, |(Adobe CS3/CS4, Flash, |Windows SDK 2008, |Windows SDK 2008, |Strawberry Perl) |Strawberry Perl, MS Office | |2010) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |seann.giffin(a)gmail.com --- Comment #107 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> 2013-05-31 12:32:24 CDT --- I see 1.5.31 is available for testing, and this bug is still sticking it's ugly little head up and I'm not sure if the patch mentioned in comment #73 will work on 1.5. How's the progress looking for a more permanent fix? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #20480|application/octet-stream |application/x-bzip2 mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #20480|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #22139|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #22524|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #22916|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #28390|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #108 from Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> 2013-07-15 08:21:49 CDT --- Created attachment 45275 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=45275 msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA (wine-1.6-rc5) Still present, obviously. Patch rebased to wine-1.6-rc5 works for me. Note: We don't need any more console output or confirmation until a developer asks for it. This bug is well known. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |21017 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |15590 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Arie Skliarouk <skliarie(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skliarie(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://adobe-photoshop.en.s | |oftonic.com/download-versio | |n/adobe-photoshop-CS4 | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |18517 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Fincer <fincer89(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fincer89(a)hotmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Simon <swdevelop1981(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |swdevelop1981(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Corax <cor.ax26(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cor.ax26(a)gmail.com --- Comment #109 from Corax <cor.ax26(a)gmail.com> --- I think this bug prevents any Adobe application from installing in fact (at least Acrobat XI). I can't believe such a nuisance is still there 5 years after being reported, with patches posted right here, without a dev taking a look at it?! I think most Wine users would better have this fixed to be able to install the few major Windows software unmatched in Linux, rather than have DX10 fully implemented (which is for sure by far more complicated than this!). Or maybe this bug is rooted deeper than it seems and a proper fix would need a huge rework? Anyway with a bug still being marked NEW after 5 years, hard to tell... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #110 from NSLW <lukasz.wojnilowicz(a)gmail.com> --- Corax made good point. To summarize: - very old bug, - blocks many other bugs (and thus applications), - many observers, - some patches already present. Nevertheless no progress since long time. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #111 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Commenting on a bug is easy, coding is not. Wishing for the bug to be fixed doesn't make the work magically done. The problem is known, and it's a lot of work to do. Patches are welcome (as with all bugs..). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #112 from Jamie Nadeau <james2432(a)gmail.com> --- Might I remind everyone that is following this bug something that has been said countless times: [QUOTE]Anastasius Focht 2009-08-09 04:20:40 CDT Hello, there is no need to provide test data. The problem is well known and a short-term hack-patch exists which was consequently rejected by AJ. Until someone takes up the task to implement "remote" custom actions (custom action server) you'll have to use the hack-patch. Unfortunately this whole bug is now messed up with many useless/irritating comments that have nothing to do with the original bug. Regards [/QUOTE] Thank you -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #113 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ken Sharp from comment #108)
Created attachment 45275 [details] msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA (wine-1.6-rc5)
Still present, obviously.
Patch rebased to wine-1.6-rc5 works for me.
Note: We don't need any more console output or confirmation until a developer asks for it. This bug is well known.
How well will this patch work with the 1.7x branch? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #114 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, adding another "test-case", 'Windows Live ID Sign-in Assistant 6.5' required for newer GFWL (Games For Windows Live) 3.x clients. Download: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/confirmation.aspx?id=15106 COM is not initialized in any main/CA thread hence the failure of 'ole32.CoCreateInstance' in CA thread. --- snip --- $ WINEDEBUG=+tid,+seh,+relay,+msi wine msiexec -i wllogin_32.msi >>log.txt 2>&1 ... 002b:trace:msi:HANDLE_CustomType1 Calling function L"CAPerformMUOptin" from L"C:\\users\\focht\\Temp\\msid8c6.tmp" ... 002b:Call KERNEL32.CreateThread(00000000,00000000,7ecf3c96,001b18a4,00000000,00000000) ret=7ecf3eab 002b:Ret KERNEL32.CreateThread() retval=000000a8 ret=7ecf3eab 002b:trace:msi:wait_thread_handle waiting for L"CAPerformMUOptIn" ... 002d:Starting thread proc 0x7ecf3c96 (arg=0x1b18a4) 002d:trace:msi:DllThread custom action (2d) started 002d:trace:msi:ACTION_CallDllFunction {ef9499af-7bcd-4aac-ad13-ebfa5220026c} 002d:trace:msi:DllGetClassObject {ba26e6fa-4f27-4f56-953a-3f90272018aa} {00000001-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} 0x9ce854 002d:trace:msi:MsiCF_CreateInstance 0x7edda178 (nil) {56d58b64-8780-4c22-a8bc-8b0b29e4a9f8} 0x9ce850 ... 002d:Call KERNEL32.LoadLibraryW(00b28f4c L"C:\\users\\focht\\Temp\\msid8c6.tmp") ret=7ecf3907 002d:Ret KERNEL32.LoadLibraryW() retval=00d10000 ret=7ecf3907 ... 002d:trace:msi:ACTION_CallDllFunction calling L"CAPerformMUOptin" ... 002d:Call ole32.CoCreateInstance(00d112d0,00000000,00000001,00d112b0,009ce830) ret=00d16c7c 002d:Call ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap(00110000,00000008,000000fc) ret=7eac6d64 002d:Ret ntdll.RtlAllocateHeap() retval=001edfe8 ret=7eac6d64 002d:err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised 002d:Ret ole32.CoCreateInstance() retval=800401f0 ret=00d16c7c ... 002d:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000003,00000000,001ee138 L"PPMSI_ERROR: CAPerformMUOptin: Could not Check for MU opt in. nReturn = -2147221008") ret=00d14d35 ... 002d:trace:msi:DllThread custom action (2d) returned -2147221008 ... 002b:err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"CAPerformMUOptIn" returned 1603 --- snip --- $ sha1sum wllogin_32.msi f477f8abc4519532ef2921b1343a06f2ac546c2c wllogin_32.msi $ du -sh wllogin_32.msi 4.5M wllogin_32.msi $ wine --version wine-1.7.19-71-g94ccd61 Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #115 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, while visiting bug 16940 I made a trace log with 'Adobe Indesign CS4'. There is nothing new, just for getting more search engine hits... so please ignore :) --- snip --- ... 002a:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x100dc2c6,module=0x10000000 L"msid91c.tmp",reason=THREAD_ATTACH,res=(nil)) retval=1 002a:Starting thread proc 0x7be18b2a (arg=0x29e89b4) 002a:trace:msi:DllThread custom action (2a) started 002a:trace:msi:ACTION_CallDllFunction {a18ece91-2e21-4d3f-b36d-92bfac358582} ... 002a:trace:msi:ACTION_CallDllFunction calling L"Adobe_ProcessPropertyFile" ... 002a:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000003,00000000,0b4a1bf0 L"19:58:17:970 -(Adobe)- -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- BEGIN - Adobe_ProcessPropertyFile -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- ") ret=10010ecc ... 002a:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000003,00000000,0b49e048 L"19:58:17:971 -(Adobe)- Requesting property: PROPERTY_FILE ") ret=10002eac ... 002a:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000003,00000000,0b4a1b10 L"19:58:17:973 -(Adobe)- Value C:\\users\\focht\\Temp\\adbd633.tmp ") ret=10002eac ... 002a:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000003,00000000,0b49e048 L"19:58:17:974 -(Adobe)- Processing property file ") ret=10002eac ... 002a:Call ole32.CLSIDFromProgID(0b49e2a0 L"MSXML2.DOMDocument.6.0",0b79e054) ret=100909f1 ... 002a:Ret ole32.CLSIDFromProgID() retval=00000000 ret=100909f1 002a:Call ole32.CoCreateInstance(0b79e054,00000000,00000017,1014c6d4,0b4971f0) ret=10090a15 ... 002a:err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised 002a:Ret ole32.CoCreateInstance() retval=800401f0 ret=10090a15 002a:Call ole32.CLSIDFromProgID(0b49de90 L"MSXML2.DOMDocument.5.0",0b79e054) ret=100909f1 ... 002a:Ret ole32.CLSIDFromProgID() retval=800401f3 ret=100909f1 002a:Call ole32.CLSIDFromProgID(0b49e118 L"MSXML2.DOMDocument.4.0",0b79e054) ret=100909f1 ... 002a:Ret ole32.CLSIDFromProgID() retval=00000000 ret=100909f1 002a:Call ole32.CoCreateInstance(0b79e054,00000000,00000017,1014c6d4,0b4971f0) ret=10090a15 002a:err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised 002a:Ret ole32.CoCreateInstance() retval=800401f0 ret=10090a15 002a:Call ole32.CLSIDFromProgID(0b4a19b8 L"MSXML2.DOMDocument.3.0",0b79e054) ret=100909f1 ... 002a:Call ole32.CoCreateInstance(0b79e054,00000000,00000017,1014c6d4,0b4971f0) ret=10090a15 ... 002a:err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised 002a:Ret ole32.CoCreateInstance() retval=800401f0 ret=10090a15 002a:Call ole32.CLSIDFromProgID(0b4a19f0 L"MSXML.DOMDocument",0b79e054) ret=100909f1 ... 002a:Call ole32.CoCreateInstance(0b79e054,00000000,00000017,1014c6d4,0b4971f0) ret=10090a15 ... 002a:err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised 002a:Ret ole32.CoCreateInstance() retval=800401f0 ret=10090a15 ... 002a:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000003,00000000,0b4a19c0 L"19:58:17:976 -(Adobe)- Unable to load file: C:\\users\\focht\\Temp\\adbd633.tmp ") ret=10002eac ... 002a:Call msi.MsiRecordSetStringW(00000004,00000000,0b49e048 L"19:58:18:111 -(Adobe)- #_AdobeError_# 1603 ") ret=100114b7 ... 002a:trace:msi:MsiCloseHandle 1 002a:trace:msi:DllThread custom action (2a) returned 1603 002a:trace:msi:MsiCloseAllHandles 002a:trace:msi:MsiCloseHandle 3 002a:trace:msi:MsiCloseHandle handle 3 destroyed 002a:Call PE DLL (proc=0x100dc2c6,module=0x10000000 L"msid91c.tmp",reason=THREAD_DETACH,res=(nil)) ... 0028:err:msi:ITERATE_Actions Execution halted, action L"ProcessPropertyFile.E35C3ECB_5FDA_49E1_AB1F_D472B7CB9017" returned 1603 --- snip --- $ wine --version wine-1.7.22-71-gc39bce0 Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #116 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 49557 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49557 msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA (wine-1.7.26) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |34064 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #117 from Pekka Helenius <fincer89(a)hotmail.com> --- Created attachment 50758 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50758 msi: Start a dummy thread to initialize an MTA (wine-1.7.36) Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 installer works fine with the patch from comment #73 applied to Wine 1.7.36 (see attachment). However, winetricks stuff which is still necessarily required (msxml3 msxml6 ie6 vcrun6). *OT* You can also run Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 with Wine 1.7.36. There's serious GUI issues, though (Bug 38073). *OT* -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |37624 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Supatcha <papermint8767(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |papermint8767(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Jose <jmor14289(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmor14289(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 tonton <mmario240(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmario240(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |agusti.rafols(a)gmail.com --- Comment #118 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- *** Bug 40278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #49557|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #119 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 53943 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53943 Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 1.9.5 action.c Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 1.9.5 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 anewuser <caipora(a)fastmail.fm> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caipora(a)fastmail.fm -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Qwerty Chouskie <asdfghrbljzmkd(a)outlook.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |asdfghrbljzmkd(a)outlook.com --- Comment #120 from Qwerty Chouskie <asdfghrbljzmkd(a)outlook.com> --- Could the dummy MSI thread patch at least get put in Staging? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 張修銘 <cges30901(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cges30901(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #121 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 58400 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=58400 action.c Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 2.10 I don't know if anybody still cares, but this patch works on wine 2.10 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #122 from somerandomuser <emailmeat(a)protonmail.com> --- (In reply to Seann from comment #121)
Created attachment 58400 [details] action.c Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 2.10
I don't know if anybody still cares, but this patch works on wine 2.10
I still care about Fireworks. If you have some free time, please take a look at this bug to see if you can do anything about it: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39086 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #123 from Qwerty Chouskie <asdfghrbljzmkd(a)outlook.com> --- (In reply to Seann from comment #121)
Created attachment 58400 [details] action.c Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 2.10
I don't know if anybody still cares, but this patch works on wine 2.10
Thanks for keeping this up-to-date. I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #124 from Qwerty Chouskie <asdfghrbljzmkd(a)outlook.com> --- (In reply to Qwerty Chouskie from comment #123)
(In reply to Seann from comment #121)
Created attachment 58400 [details] action.c Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 2.10
I don't know if anybody still cares, but this patch works on wine 2.10
Thanks for keeping this up-to-date.
I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted.
It has been accepted into Staging. Yay! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 fjfrackiewicz(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fjfrackiewicz(a)gmail.com --- Comment #125 from fjfrackiewicz(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to Qwerty Chouskie from comment #124)
(In reply to Qwerty Chouskie from comment #123)
(In reply to Seann from comment #121)
Created attachment 58400 [details] action.c Patch for running dummy MSI thread, updated for wine 2.10
I don't know if anybody still cares, but this patch works on wine 2.10
Thanks for keeping this up-to-date.
I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted.
It has been accepted into Staging. Yay!
Shouldn't the status be set to "staging" along with the accepted patchset? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Andrea Vai <andrea.vai(a)unipv.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrea.vai(a)unipv.it -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Giacomo Orlandi <gia_(a)inwind.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gia_(a)inwind.it --- Comment #126 from Giacomo Orlandi <gia_(a)inwind.it> --- (In reply to fjfrackiewicz from comment #125) [...]
I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted.
It has been accepted into Staging. Yay!
Shouldn't the status be set to "staging" along with the accepted patchset?
The description of the patch above says it's only a workaround to make the apps work until there is a proper fix. I can't see a policy for this in https://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs but I assume that a bug can be marked as "fixed on staging" only if it's a proper fix, even if it hasn't been merged into the main codebase yet because it needs reviewing and some improvements. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staged patchset| |https://github.com/wine-com | |pholio/wine-staging/blob/ma | |ster/patches/msi-Dummy_Thre | |ad/0001-msi-Create-dummy-th | |read-to-initialize-COM-for- | |custom.patch Status|NEW |STAGED --- Comment #127 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Giacomo Orlandi from comment #126)
(In reply to fjfrackiewicz from comment #125) [...]
I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted.
It has been accepted into Staging. Yay!
Shouldn't the status be set to "staging" along with the accepted patchset?
The description of the patch above says it's only a workaround to make the apps work until there is a proper fix.
I can't see a policy for this in https://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs but I assume that a bug can be marked as "fixed on staging" only if it's a proper fix, even if it hasn't been merged into the main codebase yet because it needs reviewing and some improvements.
That's not such an easy distinction to make. If the fix is proper, it wouldn't be in staging anyway, but in vanilla Wine. If the bug exists in vanilla wine, but not wine-staging, it is reasonable to make the status 'STAGED'. Side note: the staging version is less hacky than the original submission.. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #128 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #127)
(In reply to Giacomo Orlandi from comment #126)
(In reply to fjfrackiewicz from comment #125) [...]
I submitted the patch to Wine Staging: https://dev.wine-staging.com/patches/132/ Let's hope this gets accepted.
It has been accepted into Staging. Yay!
Shouldn't the status be set to "staging" along with the accepted patchset?
The description of the patch above says it's only a workaround to make the apps work until there is a proper fix.
I can't see a policy for this in https://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs but I assume that a bug can be marked as "fixed on staging" only if it's a proper fix, even if it hasn't been merged into the main codebase yet because it needs reviewing and some improvements.
That's not such an easy distinction to make. If the fix is proper, it wouldn't be in staging anyway, but in vanilla Wine.
If the bug exists in vanilla wine, but not wine-staging, it is reasonable to make the status 'STAGED'.
Side note: the staging version is less hacky than the original submission..
The staging version looks good. I'm going to test it this weekend. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.co | |m | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #129 from somerandomuser <emailmeat(a)protonmail.com> --- It's good to see activity in an issue related to Fireworks. Could any of you who worked on this take a look at https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39086 or at least mark it as confirmed? Fireworks CS6 is completely unusable because of it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #130 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- I've been looking at a proper solution for this. We already have the MSIServer service already implemented—it just doesn't do anything yet. I think the best way to fix this is to register the IWineMsiRemote* classes in the server process with REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE, so not much change in infrastructure at all. I see two ways of doing this: either move all of the COM objects into msiexec.exe, or add an internal function in msi.dll. I like the first one for the sake of separation, but it does mean we need an internal idl. Any thoughts on this from anyone else? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #131 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #130)
I've been looking at a proper solution for this.
We already have the MSIServer service already implemented—it just doesn't do anything yet. I think the best way to fix this is to register the IWineMsiRemote* classes in the server process with REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE, so not much change in infrastructure at all. I see two ways of doing this: either move all of the COM objects into msiexec.exe, or add an internal function in msi.dll. I like the first one for the sake of separation, but it does mean we need an internal idl.
Any thoughts on this from anyone else?
Did you try to investigate how that's done in Windows, so you wouldn't need to invent custom interfaces? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 somerandomuser <emailmeat(a)protonmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|emailmeat(a)protonmail.com | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #132 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #131)
(In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #130)
I've been looking at a proper solution for this.
We already have the MSIServer service already implemented—it just doesn't do anything yet. I think the best way to fix this is to register the IWineMsiRemote* classes in the server process with REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE, so not much change in infrastructure at all. I see two ways of doing this: either move all of the COM objects into msiexec.exe, or add an internal function in msi.dll. I like the first one for the sake of separation, but it does mean we need an internal idl.
Any thoughts on this from anyone else?
Did you try to investigate how that's done in Windows, so you wouldn't need to invent custom interfaces?
Windows appears to have its own set of internal interfaces, e.g. {000c101c-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} "Msi install server". We actually have an IDL for these in msi.dll, since evidently some program tries to create one. But these interfaces are all internal; we don't even know the vtbls. It would appear that this approach would be close enough to replicating that one. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #133 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #132)
Windows appears to have its own set of internal interfaces, e.g. {000c101c-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} "Msi install server". We actually have an IDL for these in msi.dll, since evidently some program tries to create one. But these interfaces are all internal; we don't even know the vtbls. It would appear that this approach would be close enough to replicating that one.
Does this help? https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2007-January/029786.html https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa369432(v=vs.85).a... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Viktoria <viktoria.s(a)freemail.hu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|viktoria.s(a)freemail.hu | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #134 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #133)
Does this help? https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2007-January/029786.html https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa369432(v=vs.85). aspx
Unfortunately, no. It seems pretty clear that IInstaller & co. aren't the interfaces to the server, since they can still be created and used while the service is disabled. Rather, I suspect, the interface labeled IMsiServer (and probably also the unlabeled 000C1094) are the interfaces, and these are not documented either as coclass or IDispatch. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #135 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Actually, on further testing, it seems that the server creates a separate process to run custom DLLs, so it's not necessarily true that we need a proper implementation of the server process. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Arie Skliarouk <skliarie(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|skliarie(a)gmail.com | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |z.figura12(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pembertona(a)gmail.com --- Comment #136 from Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> --- Can anyone share exactly where this patch is staged? Is it available on 3.x staging builds for example? Or 2.21? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #137 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Andy P from comment #136)
Can anyone share exactly where this patch is staged? Is it available on 3.x staging builds for example? Or 2.21?
The patch should be included in 2.x and 3.x builds since 2.12. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #138 from Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks, Zebediah. Does that mean -staging builds from then on? Or -devel too? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #139 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Andy P from comment #138)
Thanks, Zebediah. Does that mean -staging builds from then on? Or -devel too?
Just staging. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #140 from Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks, Austin. I've not found the patch to help with the dotnet40 issues related to msi's installing only 32 bit DLLs. My suspicion is that because the Executables involved are 32 bit themselves, they are loading msiexec through 32 bit. When I manually trigger msiexec on 64 bit, the correct DLLs are loaded - but only for 64 bit... and I think there are also some important steps loaded through the .exe that I then miss in the case. In case it helps anyone, here's the command to run msiexec manually (and work around the prompt telling you only to use setup.exe): wine64 'msiexec' '/i' 'c:/dotnet40/netfx_Core_x64.msi' 'EXTUI=1' -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |85d1fb62b321e890004bc8d0ded | |7a0183216c42d Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|z.figura12(a)gmail.com |wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Status|STAGED |RESOLVED --- Comment #141 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Fixed by https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commit/85d1fb62b321e890004bc8d0ded7a0.... Please file new bugs for further problems. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #142 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- I take it this does not apply to Wine development release 3.6, so I'll have to build from a fresh git or use the patch? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #143 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Seann from comment #142)
I take it this does not apply to Wine development release 3.6, so I'll have to build from a fresh git or use the patch?
It does not apply to 3.6, but it'll be included in 3.7, which is released tomorrow. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #144 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, that's actually a great milestone after all the years analysing all the apps affected by this and collecting them here ;-) *** NOTE *** Currently it won't work because the MSI custom action server process crashes on all custom actions. See bug 45073 for details. I hope a fix makes it in before the Wine 3.7 release - otherwise expect gazillion of bug reports. I've tested with some smaller installers I could quickly get hold of (Windows SDK 2008) and they work as expected (after applying fix for bug 45073). Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Andrej C. <andrej.cremoznik(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|andrej.cremoznik(a)gmail.com | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 --- Comment #145 from Seann <seann.giffin(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zebediah Figura from comment #143)
(In reply to Seann from comment #142)
I take it this does not apply to Wine development release 3.6, so I'll have to build from a fresh git or use the patch?
It does not apply to 3.6, but it'll be included in 3.7, which is released tomorrow.
Excellent! Thanks for the hard work! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #146 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 3.7. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://web.archive.org/web | |/20151130215125/ftp://ftp.a | |dobe.com/pub/adobe/indesign | |/win/cs3/indesign_5_0_3.exe -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla