[Bug 26263] New: __wine_call_from_regs violates x86 ABI
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 Summary: __wine_call_from_regs violates x86 ABI Product: Wine Version: 1.3.14 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: bart.vanassche(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=33470) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33470) Valgrind output As far as I know x86 applications should not modify data below the stack pointer. Running the latest (2011-02-27) git version of Wine under Valgrind results in many "address is just below the stack pointer" complaints. See also the attachment for the output of the following command: valgrind --suppressions=wine-memcheck.supp --trace-children=yes --trace-children-skip=/usr/bin/wineserver --trace-children-skip-by-arg=wineboot.exe,winemenubuilder.exe,services.exe,winedevice.exe,plugplay.exe,explorer.exe --vex-iropt-precise-memory-exns=yes --num-callers=32 --fullpath-after=$HOME/software --error-limit=no --gen-suppressions=all wine notepad -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nerv(a)dawncrow.de Component|-unknown |ntdll --- Comment #1 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2011-02-27 08:18:26 CST --- code is produced in winebuild, but used in ntdll, so setting ntdll here. it's used in macro: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git?a=blob;f=dlls/ntdll/ntdll_misc.h#l243 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2011-02-27 09:55:27 CST --- Just suppress the warning. It's not worth making the function more complex and slower just for that reason. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 --- Comment #3 from Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-27 11:04:20 CST --- (In reply to comment #2)
Just suppress the warning. It's not worth making the function more complex and slower just for that reason.
Are there any x86 platforms supported by Wine that do not define SA_ONSTACK ? In that case a signal delivered by the kernel to the Wine process might change the data below the stack pointer. That could result in very strange effects. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2011-02-27 13:28:14 CST --- If signals are not delivered on the signal stack you'll have much more serious problems. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2011-02-27 23:59:00 CST --- Marking as a WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2011-02-27 23:59:12 CST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26263 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED Fixed by SHA1| |e3a236e6ce368e3d960cfbe3018 | |d3a5cb52a0add --- Comment #7 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Marking fixed as this function was removed in 2.14. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org